American Public: Supreme Court got it wrong

Suprisingly, conservatives and liberals agree

This gives me hope that something, other than a constitutional amendment, can be done to counter this.

Nice. And to think, McCain's supposed to be evil.

Give me a corporation or labor union and I'll agree with the ruling. Until then, I oppose.
Ditto for the rest of America on any imaginable subject.

Clearly, the SCOTUS is working for (or is?) the Lizards. Though honestly, when your country does something you don't agree with, it's time to revolt; it's the American way.

People need to pick up their pitchrforks and pickaxes and march on Washington, this will not stand, man.

Originally posted by Robtard
Clearly, the SCOTUS is working for (or is?) the Lizards. Though honestly, when your country does something you don't agree with, it's time to revolt; it's the American way.

People need to pick up their pitchrforks and pickaxes and march on Washington, this will not stand, man.

You got it all wrong. It's the Freemansons and the Greys.

Originally posted by ArtificialGlory
You got it all wrong. It's the Freemansons and the Greys.

Originally posted by Darth Jello
Grey is a hurtful, racist term. Don't you watch the X-Files? They prefer to be called Colonists.

Does that have something to do with the anal-probings?

Originally posted by Robtard
Does that have something to do with the anal-probings?

Originally posted by Darth Jello

This cartoon completely fails specifically because he should have said, "addicting" instead of "addictive" at the end.

😐

No, that part is passable; it fails because it's clearly a pro-homo add disguised as something else.

Originally posted by Robtard
No, that part is passable; it fails because it's clearly a pro-homo add disguised as something else.

hmm

*reads again*

You may be right cause there's only one woman and she is in support of the "corporate" men being the "tops/givers."

Originally posted by The Dark Cloud
Suprisingly, conservatives and liberals agree

This gives me hope that something, other than a constitutional amendment, can be done to counter this.

The American Public was also decidedly against desegregation.

Public opinion is not fact.

Do not confuse the two.

Originally posted by Ordo
The American Public was also decidedly against desegregation.

Public opinion is not fact.

Do not confuse the two.

Fail.

I'm one of the 20% of people conditionally for this. I think it greatly goes against the first amendment to limit who supports whom. I just think campaigns should be limited to prevent things from going ape shit like a $700+ billion campaign from Obama in 2008. That's toooooo far.

Originally posted by dadudemon
I'm one of the 20% of people conditionally for this. I think it greatly goes against the first amendment to limit who supports whom. I just think campaigns should be limited to prevent things from going ape shit like a $700+ billion campaign from Obama in 2008. That's toooooo far.

The Constitution also needs to adapt to the times and you're not naive enough to think that corporations will always (with few individual exceptions) be able to attract a politicians favor more-so than private citizens.

I agree on the cash limitation. I think the donation amount should be limited to $5.00 per person, corporation or entity. Also for a cap on maximum amount of money to be used, maybe make if 5-10 million, with all excesses being donated to cancer, HIV, food shelters and like charities.

Originally posted by sesuna
NYC Asian Escorts Outcall can help you when you feel lonely being away from home, or you just looking for a pleasant erotic adventure. You can always book appointments to date with our beautiful young well-educated Asian Escorts Agents. We will arrange you to get acquainted with our beautiful elegant escorts in NYC.
tel : 646-248-2426
w w w.nyasianescortsoutcall.com

WARNING: All the escorts are lady-boys.

Originally posted by dadudemon
I'm one of the 20% of people conditionally for this. I think it greatly goes against the first amendment to limit who supports whom. I just think campaigns should be limited to prevent things from going ape shit like a $700+ billion campaign from Obama in 2008. That's toooooo far.

Yes but the amount of corruption that is going to be added on now is going to be utterly ridiculous.

Now the corporate American parties will get direct funding from their lackeys, damn you capitalism.

Originally posted by Robtard
WARNING: All the escorts are lady-boys.

Any you'd recommend in particular?

Originally posted by botankus
Any you'd recommend in particular?

Suk Mi.