Originally posted by Sasaraixx
I disagree with a lot of this. Most who argue for Superman winning in a fight against Thor list his superior speed as one of the keys to his victory. With WW, that speed advantage doesn't exist in a fight.I also don't think that Superman can put her down "quick[ly]." I give Clark a majority over Diana but he works for it.
And giving Diana Mjolnir is a pretty significant advantage. Even if we remove all of the esoteric elements of the hammer, it will still amp her striking capabilities and with her base strength that would most definitely hurt Superman.
In most forum fights we're dealing with standard WW and in that context, she loses a majority to Superman. But if we add in her weapons, I think she wins. Just adding her sword would be enough to tip the scales in her favor because she no longer has to KO him. The lasso is obviously a huge asset, but its hard to execute in close combat. She also doesn't normally use her tiara as a h2h weapon. Giving her a weapon like Mjolnir, even without having the finesse with it that Thor does, gives her a way of overcoming Superman's durability much more quickly. Given how proficient WW is with all forms of armed combat, I think it's safe to assume that she would wield the hammer very effectively.
This is all with her own gifts. Her tactical prowess is already top notch thanks to her gift from Athena. Adding in Batman's on top of that makes her even more of a threat.
I think someone like Surfer or Stardust could take her. To win a fight like that she'd have to understand all of Mjolnir's properties and the thread doesn't state that she does.
Having Batman's brain would certainly help her figure the Mjolnir out on the fly. Of course it would take years for her to get Thor's skill with the Mjolnir but I think she could get the hang of things.