Originally posted by h1a8Just stop lying now, you are sounding more and more like a idiot.
For Omega it was implied that he call upon his outside shields. For Drax and Thor he simply waved his hands.It was proven that Thanos shields came from outside sources since he wouldn't need to call upon them and wave his hand instead.
Against Omega he said he used 3 PERSONAL shields, and against Drax he had his back turned the whole time whilst he was working on a machine with both hands, neither time did he call or raise his hands to erect a shield.
Originally posted by Nihilist
Just stop lying now, you are sounding more and more like a idiot.Against Omega he said he used 3 PERSONAL shields, and against Drax he had his back turned the whole time whilst he was working on a machine with both hands, neither time did he call or raise his hands to erect a shield.
The personal shields were from outside sources. Thanos already had his shield up when Drax attacked.
Originally posted by Nihilist
His personal shields are created by himself, and if you have proof otherwise lets see it.Thanos can create energy shield/fields has shown.
I disagree. As all comic evidence supports him creating shields or force fields with his hand or calling upon them from another source.
Originally posted by h1a8when he calls upon them or uses his hand to create them, he does just that in the perticular instance 😐
I disagree. As all comic evidence supports him creating shields or force fields with his hand or calling upon them from another source.
if he doesn't do that how could you assume the stuff ^ above could be the cause of the shield? it's not like eternals aren't taught shield creation techniques from an early age.
Originally posted by psycho gundam
when he calls upon them or uses his hand to create them, he does just that in the perticular instance 😐if he doesn't do that how could you assume the stuff ^ above could be the cause of the shield? it's not like eternals aren't taught shield creation techniques from an early age.
Rule #1 is that something only exists if it is shown to exist. If it isn't shown to exist then it doesn't exist.
Thus the burden is always on one to prove the positive and not the negative. Because the negative is always true by default.
Originally posted by h1a8the burden is never on you is it?
Rule #1 is that something only exists if it is shown to exist. If it isn't shown to exist then it doesn't exist.Thus the burden is always on one to prove the positive and not the negative. Because the negative is always true by default.
you're the one making claims his shields are for the majority artificial and erected on command, go ahead and prove it. you're the only one assuming there is more to the picture of him erecting a shield, and if thanos was unable to create shields naturally you'd have a case, without it you're just baiting further abuse.
Originally posted by psycho gundamI didn't claim that. Someone claimed that Thanos can raise shields without waving his hands or calling them from an outside source. My argument was to show that it is speculation. I'm not claiming Thanos can't do it from first principle, but that he can't because he never shown it.
the burden is never on you is it?you're the one making claims his shields are for the majority artificial and erected on command, go ahead and prove it. you're the only one assuming there is more to the picture of him erecting a shield, and if thanos was unable to create shields naturally you'd have a case, without it you're just baiting further abuse.
Originally posted by h1a8You don't read these comics so again what's the point of discussing these things with you on here.
I didn't claim that. Someone claimed that Thanos can raise shields without waving his hands or calling them from an outside source. My argument was to show that it is speculation. I'm not claiming Thanos can't do it from first principle, but that he can't because he never shown it.
Originally posted by h1a8fine, but you didn't let it go. noooo, you had to counter speculate and add MORE assumptions by saying there was more to the scene(s).
I didn't claim that. Someone claimed that Thanos can raise shields without waving his hands or calling them from an outside source. My argument was to show that it is speculation. I'm not claiming Thanos can't do it from first principle, but that he can't because he never shown it.
you are not in the right at all, how you keep adding more to simple pictures is a forum joke at this point.
Originally posted by psycho gundam
fine, but you didn't let it go. noooo, you had to counter speculate and add MORE assumptions by saying there was more to the scene(s).you are not in the right at all, how you keep adding more to simple pictures is a forum joke at this point.
I only add possibilities that show that something isn't necessarily the case. My assumptions aren't necessarily true. They are just possibilities that prove that it is speculation on the original claim.
You marvel guys stick together, even when u r wrong. That's horrible. I don't mind u guys favoring marvel or even being marvel bias. But it is dispicable when u try to point out flaws in my argument yet when another marvel fan argument is similarily flawed u become silent to it. Double Standard like hell.
When I post scans trying to support my position others make stuff up to discredit the feat. Yet u have a problem when I do it. This isn't right dude.
Originally posted by h1a8But you don't prove anyone wrong you just speculate and it usually goes against the evidence. Whether someone is marvel bias or dc bias is besides the point as you clearly don't read comics.
I only add possibilities that show that something isn't necessarily the case. My assumptions aren't necessarily true. They are just possibilities that prove that it is speculation on the original claim.You marvel guys stick together, even when u r wrong. That's horrible. I don't mind u guys favoring marvel or even being marvel bias. But it is dispicable when u try to point out flaws in my argument yet when another marvel fan argument is similarily flawed u become silent to it. Double Standard like hell.
When I post scans trying to support my position others make stuff up to discredit the feat. Yet u have a problem when I do it. This isn't right dude.
Originally posted by quanchi112
But you don't prove anyone wrong you just speculate and it usually goes against the evidence. Whether someone is marvel bias or dc bias is besides the point as you clearly don't read comics.
You clearly lie though. Also everyone one here speculates. When I do it is wrong though.