Originally posted by Parmaniac
Well he was removed not killed, was it stated that the Guardians wanted to kill him or just remove him?
Originally posted by ParmaniacA little of both. The Guardian-detonation was meant to mainly BFR Prime from the universe (via atomic removal) so he couldn't cause any further damage. However, the Guardians also knew the attack would either kill Prime OR warp him into the multiverse:
was it stated that the Guardians wanted to kill him or just remove him?
Either way, he didn't just 'tank' the blast..
Originally posted by Galan007
A little of both. The Guardian-detonation was meant to mainly BFR Prime from the universe (via atomic removal) so he couldn't cause any further damage. However, the Guardians also knew the attack would either kill Prime OR warp him into the multiverse:
http://img532.imageshack.us/img532/8886/prime1.jpgEither way, he didn't just 'tank' the blast..
Originally posted by Omega VisionYeah, the whole "it might do this, or it could do that" part of things was a bit ridiculous.
Still seems ridiculous. You'd think the Guardian would have to put some effort into ensuring Prime would be descrambled in exactly the same condition as he was in prior to his atomization. In effect it was less a blast and more a teleporter.
Thanks Johns. srsly
Originally posted by Mindset
Why not?
Originally posted by Omega VisionWell, that's a weakened Juggs, so obviously.
Because the only reason Prime survived it was some (in all honesty) super-impossible cosmic fluke. Being atomized and deposited in a another universe isn't "tanking". It really depends on how much respect you have for Cytorrak's enchantment. And some versions (like Pre-WWH Redemption Juggs) stand absolutely no chance.