Originally posted by kakuzuI like Thor more and am using Gladiator's fights against Thor as proof and against common opponents such as Hyperion. Thor is at his most deadly with his hammer not without.
By the way for those saying gladiator is there any proof he wins or do you just think its sounds cooler to say gladiator beat Thor? Cause when it comes to proof Thors done alot more hand to hand fighting.
Originally posted by quanchi112Why would you say something so stupid? Of course he's more deadly with his hammer. Ironman is more deadly with his suit. Thor with out his hammer can still kick some major ass. If you were Thor and had to go up against his foes you would need hsi hammer. I don't se gladiator taking on surtur or mangog with out the hammer. Thor beat hyperion quite easily.
I like Thor more and am using Gladiator's fights against Thor as proof and against common opponents such as Hyperion. Thor is at his most deadly with his hammer not without.
Originally posted by kakuzuLosing to Glads without your weapon isn't a bad thing. Glads is faster also and his skill level is right up to par with Thor's. I give him the majority against champion, brb without his hammer, and herc straight up anyways. Gladiator that is.
Why would you say something so stupid? Of course he's more deadly with his hammer. Ironman is more deadly with his suit. Thor with out his hammer can still kick some major ass. If you were Thor and had to go up against his foes you would need hsi hammer. I don't se gladiator taking on surtur or mangog with out the hammer. Thor beat hyperion quite easily.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Losing to Glads without your weapon isn't a bad thing. Glads is faster also and his skill level is right up to par with Thor's. I give him the majority against champion, brb without his hammer, and herc straight up anyways. Gladiator that is.
Thor is thousands of years old with thousands of years worth of fighting skill on him. Gladatiator never said how many he has, nor was it said how old his was. I know loosing to him with out a weapon isn't bad he destroys planets with three hits I"d be happy to loose to him but against Thor gladiator will loose. He doesn't just use his fighting skilsl he uses speed and laservision and what not. Look through his fights and tell me how amazing his skill is when you see him using other powers every other panel. Gladiator is only faster because he doesn't have to ride the win with out a hammer speed is no problem for Thor trust me. This is only hand to hand so gladiator wouldn't be using that speed any way.
Originally posted by kakuzuHis punches have shown to be able to greatly affect Thor. Fighting experience is great and all but when they have fought I've never seen gladiator in awe of Thor midbattle. If you ignore their fights and the fact Thor relies on his hammer all the time then you could argue Thor wins but it's not a case you are likely to win.
Thor is thousands of years old with thousands of years worth of fighting skill on him. Gladatiator never said how many he has, nor was it said how old his was. I know loosing to him with out a weapon isn't bad he destroys planets with three hits I"d be happy to loose to him but against Thor gladiator will loose. He doesn't just use his fighting skilsl he uses speed and laservision and what not. Look through his fights and tell me how amazing his skill is when you see him using other powers every other panel. Gladiator is only faster because he doesn't have to ride the win with out a hammer speed is no problem for Thor trust me. This is only hand to hand so gladiator wouldn't be using that speed any way.