The Siege #1 showing was pretty good in terms of durability. I don't know why people complain. It's his endurance and the fact that he just stood there that bothers me.
Originally posted by Mindset
Never happened.
http://i779.photobucket.com/albums/yy73/R-O-G/Thor/Vector2.jpg
And he was toying with the Hulk. Plus that was pre healing factor retcon when he had Superman level durability if I have my time lines right.
Originally posted by thanos-prime
Yes but imo in that very showing he went down much quicker than he should have.
IMO his downfall was necessary for the plot. However it really important to assess the blast power of the U-Foes (then incident with Vector and Hulk is indicative). Add to that Moonstone and Osborn and I think while he should have lasted more (or use mjolnir to block - PIS) it is kinda impressive the fact that he had no visible wounds. In addition we have the Doom-Destroyer fight where again he had no visible wounds by a slightly below Destroyer armor.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.OlympusYou don't know what a skeleton is.
The Siege #1 showing was pretty good in terms of durability. I don't know why people complain. It's his endurance and the fact that he just stood there that bothers me.http://i779.photobucket.com/albums/yy73/R-O-G/Thor/Vector2.jpg
And he was toying with the Hulk. Plus that was pre healing factor retcon when he had Superman level durability if I have my time lines right.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.OlympusIt was a good durability showing it's just my opinion that he could have taken more.
The Siege #1 showing was pretty good in terms of durability. I don't know why people complain. It's his endurance and the fact that he just stood there that bothers me.http://i779.photobucket.com/albums/yy73/R-O-G/Thor/Vector2.jpg
And he was toying with the Hulk. Plus that was pre healing factor retcon when he had Superman level durability if I have my time lines right.
Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
nah captain marvels durability is higher than superman, he is also slightly stronger
Superman is more durable and far far more stronger. You know Superman has physcological mental blocks that limited his strength right? He only releases a portion of those blocks under great duress. CM has no feats that say he is even equal to Supes in strength.
Originally posted by WarlordI think just by the way he trashed the destroyer that it was quite a bit weaker than normal destroyer.
IMO his downfall was necessary for the plot. However it really important to assess the blast power of the U-Foes (then incident with Vector and Hulk is indicative). Add to that Moonstone and Osborn and I think while he should have lasted more (or use mjolnir to block - PIS) it is kinda impressive the fact that he had no visible wounds. In addition we have the Doom-Destroyer fight where again he had no visible wounds by a slightly below Destroyer armor.