Those who sit above in shadow VS galactus

discuss

Galactus curbstomps

Galactus 10/10.

Galactus. Do they really have any feats other than being explicitly above Skyfathers like Odin?

Originally posted by AsbestosFlaygon
Galactus curbstomps

Originally posted by galactusischere
Galactus 10/10.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
Galactus. Do they really have any feats other than being explicitly above Skyfathers like Odin?

no feats no win... besides we dont know how high they are anyways above odin.. they could just be barely above him being parasitic by nature like most worshiped type beings living in another dimension,,,

Not to mention the fact that they were defeated by RKT, who is insignificant to Galactus.

Galactus sits FAR ABOVE, "those who sit above in shadow". in fact they are sat in the shadow cast by the Celestials, from the light emanating from Galactus' arse ✅

Originally posted by AsbestosFlaygon
Not to mention the fact that they were defeated by RKT, who is insignificant to Galactus.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
To be fair I'd probably give RKT the win over a starving and/or hungry Galactus since Classic Thor was able to run him off with a Godblast.

A hungry Galactus should still be stronger than a Celestial, imho.
Galactus shouldn't even feel the Godblast.

rune king thor would beat a hungry galactus any day

Originally posted by AsbestosFlaygon
TBH, I think the CIS that revolves around most of Galactus' defeats is due to the writer's lack of knowledge of Galactus' power.

A hungry Galactus should still be stronger than a Celestial, imho.
Galactus shouldn't even feel the Godblast.

The writer who created Galactus has lack of knowledge about him?

That was hungry Galactus who got driven away with the Godblast

I find it funny that Galactus fans (Not the people in this thread.) are so quick to use that Annual as evidence to Galactus being weakened (Which wouldn't make sense if their original fight is as I recall. I think it was just ignorance on the writers part.) and are so quick to dismiss it as evidence of the current cosmic hierarchy even at that time. Ten years later after the Thor #300 according to that annual, it went something like this if I recall:

TOAA > Living Tribunal > Eternity > Exitar > Fourth Host > Odin/Surtur > Peak Power Galactus/Destroyer/Mangog > Thor

The annual came out as late as 1989. The entire Skyfather, Cosmic Abstract titles are just that. Titles. That's why even in the late 90's, Odin can come out and rock the Multiverse, and destroy Galaxies with Seth.

It probably wasn't until very recently that Galactus and Odin's positions mattered.

I think it's the Celestial fight that have made Odin suffer in the eyes of fans today. Although I have no idea why since Galactus would have not fared against the Celestials any better than Odin at the time. It was when they were first truly integrated into the Marvel Universe as far as I can tell and of course where going to be portrayed as extremely powerful.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Odin/Surtur > Peak Power Galactus

Originally posted by Starscream M
oh my god...you've truly gone off to the looney bin lol

Originally posted by AsbestosFlaygon
A hungry Galactus should still be stronger than a Celestial

Originally posted by Starscream M
oh my god...you've truly gone off to the looney bin lol

Haha. It's funny how you chime in like you know what your talking about. Read Thor Annual #14. I recall Thor saying something such as "I know not whether even Odin could beat the World Devourer at the peak of his power."

Hmmm....

It should be changed to this to be fair:

"Odin/Surtur/Peak Power Galactus"

Or the very least this:

"Odin/Surtur =/> Peak Power Galactus"

But I think it should be the former if I recall the statement right.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Haha. It's funny how you chime in like you know what your talking about. Read Thor Annual #14. I recall Thor saying something such as "I know not whether even Odin could beat the World Devourer at the peak of his power."

did you get my PM btw?