Sean Hanity...so sad

Started by tru-marvell5 pages

Sean Hanity...so sad

http://www.debbieschlussel.com/6938/sean-hannitys-freedom-concert-scam-only-7-of-charitys-money-went-to-injured-troops-kids-of-fallen-troops-g5s-g6s-for-vannity/

By Debbie Schlussel

For the last several years, Sean Hannity and the Freedom Alliance “charity” have conducted “Freedom Concerts” across America. They’ve told you that they are raising money to pay for the college tuition of the children of fallen soldiers and to pay severely wounded war vets. And on Friday Night, Hannity will be honored with an award for this “Outstanding Community Service by a Radio Talk Show Host” at Talkers Magazine’s convention.

But it’s all a huge scam.

In fact, less than 20%–and in two recent years, less than 7% and 4%, respectively–of the money raised by Freedom Alliance went to these causes, while millions of dollars went to expenses, including consultants and apparently to ferry the Hannity posse of family and friends in high style. And, despite Hannity’s statements to the contrary on his nationally syndicated radio show, few of the children of fallen soldiers got more than $1,000-$2,000, with apparently none getting more than $6,000, while Freedom Alliance appears to have spent tens of thousands of dollars for private planes. Moreover, despite written assurances to donors that all money raised would go directly to scholarships for kids of the fallen heroes and not to expenses, has begun charging expenses of nearly $500,000 to give out just over $800,000 in scholarships.

In February 2009, a well-known conservative writer sent me this, about a friend at FOX News:

The guy went on to tell me about Hannity’s “Freedom Concerts,” which are staged across the country with the proceeds going to children of slain soldiers. Of course, as the guy tells it, there’d be a lot more money every concert to go to the cause if Hannity didn’t demand–and get–use of a Gulfstream 5 plane to fly him and his family/entourage to the concerts; a “fleet” (that’s the word the guy used) of either Cadillac or Lincoln SUVs for him and his family/entourage; and several suites at really expensive hotels for him and his family/entourage. The promoter apparently values Hannity’s star demands at well over $200,000 per event. The source says he heard that Oliver North pulled Hannity aside at one of the concerts and told him that this had to stop. But that may mean that, from now on, Hannity has to fly on a G4 instead of a G5, gets only a few luxury SUVs, and two or three suites.

North is the founder and honorary chairman of Freedom Alliance.

I began investigating these claims, and lo and behold, I discovered that Freedom Alliance gives very little money to the children of slain troops to pay for college and even less to wounded troops. The stories of injuries to troops and how much Freedom Alliance gives them–$200 for a soldier from a poor neighborhood who lost three limbs–is heartbreaking. Soldiers with traumatic brain injuries, severe wounds to the face from disfiguring burns and explosions, and multiple amputations got $1,000 or less, with only a handful of exceptions.

The tax forms available to the public for the Freedom Alliance–for the years 2006-2008–paint a tragic story, a story of a charity that makes gazillions and spends very little for the purposes it claims, a charity that spends millions more on its small staff and crony consultants than it ever gives in scholarships to the children of the fallen or severely injured troops or in aid to the injured troops themselves. While Hannity’s Freedom Concerts take in millions, only a few hundred thousand go to the claimed intended recipients.

Over a year ago, when I began looking into this story, I contacted both Sean Hannity and the Freedom Alliance seeking comment and an accounting for where the money went. Both declined to answer any of my questions. Hannity refused to respond to an inquiry I sent to his personal private e-mail address asking him about the lavish expenses described in the e-mail above.

Freedom Alliance press secretary Alan Moore scheduled an interview for me with Freedom Alliance president Thomas Kilgannon, who in the past used Freedom Alliance resources to promote a book he wrote on the United Nations. But when Moore asked me what the interview would be about and I answered truthfully, the interview was not granted, and my calls to him were never returned thereafter. I told him I’d be asking Mr. Kilgannon about the expenses paid for Hannity and about the paltry percentage of Freedom Alliance funds actually going to the kids of fallen troops, to severely injured troops, and to anything other than expenses, consultants, and printing. I wanted to know why Freedom Alliance had spent $60,000 for “aviation services” in 2006.

Keep in mind that a charity is considered reputable if no more than 25% of its revenue goes to expenses and no less than 75% of it goes to the intended charity recipients. Given that, Freedom Alliance’s balance sheets are embarrassing in their shamelessness.

According to its 2006 tax returns, Freedom Alliance reported revenue of $10, 822, 785, but only $397,900–or a beyond-measly 3.68%–of that was given to the children of fallen troops as scholarships or as aid to severely injured soldiers.

On the other hand, 62% of the money went to “expenses,” including $979,485 for “consultants” and an “advisor.” Yes, consultant/advisors got more than double what injured troops and the kids of fallen troops got. The tax forms show that “New World Aviation” got paid $60,601 for “air travel.” Was that for Hannity’s G5? Like I said, neither the charity nor Hannity is talking. And finally, that year, Freedom Alliance spent $1,730,816 on postage and shipping and $1,414,215 on printing, for a total of $3,145,031, nearly half the revenue the charity spent that year and about eight times what the injured troops and the children of fallen ones received.

That’s especially heartbreaking when you compare the hundreds of thousands consultants got and the millions spent on printing and postage to the outrageously small amounts given to wounded soldiers. In 2006, Freedom Alliance gave only $1,000 to a soldier from Bay City, Michigan, whom the charity says was in the following condition:

Face was blown up and lost sight in one eye.

And that $1,000 was relatively generous, when you consider this soldier from Romulus, Michigan, whom Freedom Alliance only gave $200:

SM [serviceman] was involved in roadside bomb incident in Iraq, which caused loss of both legs and left arm.

Romulus is a mostly Black Detroit suburb, which is one of the poorest cities in Michigan and in America. Freedom Alliance gave this brave soldier roughly $67 per limb. That’s sickening.....

this is a common practice in many charitable organizations, if you don't do your research prior to donation, you have nobody to blame but yourself

Originally posted by inimalist
this is a common practice in many charitable organizations, if you don't do your research prior to donation, you have nobody to blame but yourself

👆 Exactly what I was thinking.

Re: Sean Hanity...so sad

Originally posted by tru-marvell
Freedom Alliance press secretary Alan Moore

Well that's your problem right there.

Originally posted by inimalist
this is a common practice in many charitable organizations, if you don't do your research prior to donation, you have nobody to blame but yourself

Yes and no, while the donor is ultimately responsible, it's still dishonest of the charity to put on one face, while practicing another.

In fact, it is/should be illegal, if they have a "non-profitable" tax status.

Originally posted by Robtard
Yes and no, while the donor is ultimately responsible, it's still dishonest of the charity to put on one face, while practicing another.

In fact, it is/should be illegal, if they have a "non-profitable" tax status.

for sure, I'm not saying it is despicable, but who hasn't heard of charity scams in this day?

Ultimatly, Hannity or whoever should be responsible for what they say they are doing, and that is important, but to me, the bigger issue is how easily swayed people are by nice words and celebreties, and why it is we see them as being "victimized" by their own lack of foresight in the situation.

Sure, blame Hannity for lying through his teeth, but there is some fault on the people who buy it hook line and sinker.

They prey on the kindness of people and they do it by lying. I hold the wolves to be more at fault than the sheep, imo.

Though as you said, ultimately, the sheep should know better.

Ask a car salesman what lying is and your eyes will be opened. This is not something unique to one side of the political world or the other. In other words, there are as many liberals as conservatives doing this kind of this "racket".

Buyer beware!

No one forces people to go to these concerts every year. I'm sure if they were not sufficiently entertaining, then people would not go. This is the down side to freedom of speech. So, before you (who every you are) condemn this because it does not fit your political opinion, remember freedom of speech works both ways.

It is defo the sheep's fault, 100% (unless they are mental handicap or something that affects their decisions making skills.) Every single idiot should realize, by now, that you research where you donate money to. I don't feel sorry for the "bleeding heart" conservative that gives their "tithes" to their Preacher when he drives up to the church every Wednesday and Sunday in an Escalade or Porsche. No, I'm not exaggerating, at all. Every "big" protestant church I've ever seen had the head Preacher living in a huge house, driving nice cars, all on the idiots' dollar. Preacher

I could understand if this was, say, 1000 AD. It's not. American's should know better. 99.99% of American's can smell a scam from a mile away. Yet, we still fall for them. I say GOOD! I hope those idiots go bankrupt, giving their money away to leeches.

I'm expected to feel sorry for the idiot that gives money away at an extremely extravagant concert...with effects, decorations, "celebrities", etc...and somehow I'm supposed to believe that was all done by charity and all 100 cents for every dollar I donate goes directly to the scholarships and soldiers? Give me a break. Puh leeez. facepalm

I can understand having laws out there for cons, but not for charity events that big. Nothing is illegal...

I guess I'm more 90% cheep, 10% wolf.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Ask a car salesman what lying is and your eyes will be opened. This is not something unique to one side of the political world or the other. In other words, there are as many liberals as conservatives doing this kind of this "racket".

Buyer beware!

No one forces people to go to these concerts every year. I'm sure if they were not sufficiently entertaining, then people would not go. This is the down side to freedom of speech. So, before you (who every you are) condemn this because it does not fit your political opinion, remember freedom of speech works both ways.

I've purchased several cars and been in the room many a time when a deal is being done; I know most of the BS lines a car salesman will use. That is why I don't haggle anymore, I simple tell the guy what I want to pay for the car and if he can make it happen, don't care how, could be he finds me an incredibly low rate, or he gives me six-times what my trade-in is worth. If he can't, I get up and leave. Easy as that.

Difference is, when I sign the dotted line to purchase a car, it's not under the clause of "charity", that being the defining thing here.

Originally posted by dadudemon
It is defo the sheep's fault, 100% (unless they are mental handicap or something that affects their decisions making skills.) Every single idiot should realize, by now, that you research where you donate money to. I don't feel sorry for the "bleeding heart" conservative that gives their "tithes" to their Preacher when he drives up to the church every Wednesday and Sunday in an Escalade or Porsche. No, I'm not exaggerating, at all. Every "big" protestant church I've ever seen had the head Preacher living in a huge house, driving nice cars, all on the idiots' dollar. Preacher

I could understand if this was, say, 1000 AD. It's not. American's should know better. 99.99% of American's can smell a scam from a mile away. Yet, we still fall for them. I say GOOD! I hope those idiots go bankrupt, giving their money away to leeches.

I'm expected to feel sorry for the idiot that gives money away at an extremely extravagant concert...with effects, decorations, "celebrities", etc...and somehow I'm supposed to believe that was all done by charity and all 100 cents for every dollar I donate goes directly to the scholarships and soldiers? Give me a break. Puh leeez. facepalm

I can understand having laws out there for cons, but not for charity events that big. Nothing is illegal...

I guess I'm more 90% cheep, 10% wolf.

Same could be said with false advertisement on products, ultimately it would be the buyers fault for not researching what's in the shampoo, food or car they purchased and just goign by what the label tells them, no?

Originally posted by Robtard
Same could be said with false advertisement on products, ultimately it would be the buyers fault for not researching what's in the shampoo, food or car they purchased and just goign by what the label tells them, no?

I'd say yes to some degree

But I'm certainly not as extreme as these other 2. I don't think the fact that the people who donate are at fault makes the con man's actions ok. lol, 90%, 10%, % of what

Originally posted by Robtard
I've purchased several cars and been in the room many a time when a deal is being done; I know most of the BS lines a car salesman will use. That is why I don't haggle anymore, I simple tell the guy what I want to pay for the car and if he can make it happen, don't care how, could be he finds me an incredibly low rate, or he gives me six-times what my trade-in is worth. If he can't, I get up and leave. Easy as that.

Difference is, when I sign the dotted line to purchase a car, it's not under the clause of "charity", that being the defining thing here.

Good point, however, the question that comes to mind is, do people claim the cost of those tickets to this event as a donation? I think not, but I could be wrong. If they can't claim it as a charity on their taxes, maybe that is a clue.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
, there are as many liberals as conservatives doing this kind of this "racket".

Interesting...this is why I posted this...many ppl honestly believe their particular political view gives them "moral might" and I've listened to Sean for many years and he is constantly making a moral or spiritual superior perspective to his arguments. The sad truth to life is that crooks are everywhere, in every color, every religion, every political faction, but you still have ppl willing to sell their soul to defend their "team" as more divine. So to say there are just as many liberals as conservatives doing this kind of racket is to fall into that well worn and deep trap of division which keep the group as a whole from working towards any real solutions.
I find Sean and those of his ilk disgusting simply because they knowingly prey on the masses for one reason....to keep their pockets fat.
And yes unfortunately we will always have sheep ready and eager for the slaughter and so I guess we will always have the Sean Hannity's there to swallow them whole...damn

Originally posted by tru-marvell
Interesting...this is why I posted this...many ppl honestly believe their particular political view gives them "moral might" and I've listened to Sean for many years and he is constantly making a moral or spiritual superior perspective to his arguments. The sad truth to life is that crooks are everywhere, in every color, every religion, every political faction, but you still have ppl willing to sell their soul to defend their "team" as more divine. So to say there are just as many liberals as conservatives doing this kind of racket is to fall into that well worn and deep trap of division which keep the group as a whole from working towards any real solutions.
I find Sean and those of his ilk disgusting simply because they knowingly prey on the masses for one reason....to keep their pockets fat.
And yes unfortunately we will always have sheep ready and eager for the slaughter and so I guess we will always have the Sean Hannity's there to swallow them whole...damn

So, you expect me to believe that you are "fair and balanced"? I don't buy it for a moment. My response was written on purpose, because there is never an over sympathy toward the conservative point of view on this forum. Most threads like this, are solely let's bash the conservative.

I could be wrong, so lets find out. Please name for me one liberal that does this same kind of racket, then we can talk about rising about it all.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
So, you expect me to believe that you are "fair and balanced"? I don't buy it for a moment. My response was written on purpose, because there is never an over sympathy toward the conservative point of view on this forum. Most threads like this, are solely let's bash the conservative.

Wait, people shouldn't be criticized for posing as a charity and lying? Buddhism has a weird moral system.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
I could be wrong, so lets find out. Please name for me one liberal that does this same kind of racket, then we can talk about rising about it all.

Can you name one?

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Wait, people shouldn't be criticized for posing as a charity and lying? Buddhism has a weird moral system.

Can you name one?

Yes I can name one, and more. Also, your first commit suggests that there is fairness going on in this forum. If there was even a hint of balance, you would find my commits to be quite different. Also, which moral system are you talking about?

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Yes I can name one, and more.

Then do so. I don't follow charity scandals.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Also, your first commit suggests that there is fairness going on in this forum. If there was even a hint of balance, you would find my commits to be quite different.

No it doesn't. Anyone can go look at it and see that, so I'm not sure what you're trying to do.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Also, which moral system are you talking about?

The pseudo-Randian "the victim is always at fault unless the aggressor calls itself a government" morality that pervades this whole forum.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos

"the victim is always at fault unless the aggressor calls itself a government"

LoL, well put though.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Then do so. I don't follow charity scandals.

That would defeat my point in asking the question.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
No it doesn't. Anyone can go look at it and see that, so I'm not sure what you're trying to do.

"Wait, people (conservatives) shouldn't be criticized for posing as a charity and lying?" In other words, the people on this forum think that only conservatives do things that are wrong, and liberals are always pure as the driven snow. The fact you can't name any corrupt liberals says everything.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
The pseudo-Randian "the victim is always at fault unless the aggressor calls itself a government" morality that pervades this whole forum.

What about Karma? You know, something having to do with Buddhism.