Gladiator vs Wolverine - Pure Melee Combat

Originally posted by Battlehammer
There no reason to assume it did happen given how many rediculous statements people have made over the years, like spiderman saying not even thor could lift this, or wolverine stateing the second best fighter in the word is yuiko ect.

Thats not really on pannel evidence of it happening, that spiderman saying something and given his track record for redciulous comments, it means veyr little.

Hyperbole is a statement made with out the event ever being shown, which is just that statement about glads and spidermans statement about sentry. It statements made, but not backed by any on pannel evidence of the event transpiring.

But Glads have the durability to back his statement up.

And then we have Cyclops saying this statement.

http://img503.imageshack.us/img503/7003/82709674rp3.jpg

Originally posted by carver9
But Glads have the durability to back his statement up.

And then we have Cyclops saying this statement.

http://img503.imageshack.us/img503/7003/82709674rp3.jpg

again that statement has nothing to do with what were debating. It jsut scot giving glads propers whoopy.

Originally posted by Battlehammer
There no reason to assume it did happen given how many rediculous statements people have made over the years, like spiderman saying not even thor could lift this, or wolverine stateing the second best fighter in the word is yuiko ect.

Thats not really on pannel evidence of it happening, that spiderman saying something and given his track record for redciulous comments, it means veyr little.

Hyperbole is a statement made with out the event ever being shown, which is just that statement about glads and spidermans statement about sentry. It statements made, but not backed by any on pannel evidence of the event transpiring.

You can't logically come up with a reason that Spiderman's statement is false. We know that Sentry fought Galactus, it has been addressed in 2 different comics.

Also, I don't think you know what the word hyperbole means.

Originally posted by Battlehammer
except he has no on pannel evidence of the event taking place............

again that statement has nothing to do with what were debating. It jsut scot giving glads propers whoopy.

So Scott saying that Gladiator is Invulnerable is a compliment. He must called him Invulnerable for a reason.

Originally posted by Battlehammer
though on a side note gladeator wins.

Elaborate.

I'm just curious what makes you think he wins, apparently you're not impressed with his invulnerability level (?)

Originally posted by Mindset
There's a clear difference from recalling a past event, and making a judgment about someone's abilities that are not your own. In fact, the two are not even comparable.

You can't logically come up with a reason that Spiderman's statement is false. We know that Sentry fought Galactus, it has been addressed in 2 different comics.

Also, I don't think you know what the word hyperbole means.

You can't show me evidence of the fight ever beeing shown on pannel. all we have are statements. Because some one says that glads, beat the entire x-men team with out being scratched were to assume that evidence in debates? So by the same logic we should take wolverine word that he the best fighter on the planet. I mean he stated it, and it was about his own abilities no less.

perhaps I don't, perhaps I do.

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
Elaborate.

I'm just curious what makes you think he wins, apparently you're not impressed with his invulnerability level (?)

Oh I am impressed, I just dislike when people try and uses statements made that were never shown as evidence. It not even that I don't believe glads could do it, it the fact that it never been shown and to uses a random statement as evidence in a forum match seem rediculous to me.

Originally posted by Battlehammer
Wolverine stated he the best fighter on the planet.......clearly he must be right? I mean it about his own abilities.

You can't show me evidence of the fight ever beeing shown on pannel. all we have are statements. Because some one says that glads, beat the entire x-men team with out being scratched were to assume that evidence in debates? So by the same logic we should take wolverine word that he the best fighter on the planet. I mean he stated it, and it was about his own abilities no less.

perhaps I don't, perhaps I do.

Scott just said the same thing.

http://img503.imageshack.us/img503/7003/82709674rp3.jpg

Why would two people from the xmen call him invulnerable if they can scratch or cause him harm? Is that two hyperbole statements battlehammer?

Originally posted by carver9
So Scott saying that Gladiator is Invulnerable is a compliment. He must called him Invulnerable for a reason.

there are levels of invulnerability especially when ones powers comes from there emotional state.

Originally posted by Battlehammer
Oh I am impressed, I just dislike when people try and uses statements made that were never shown as evidence. It not even that I don't believe glads could do it, it the fact that it never been shown and to uses a random statement as evidence in a forum match seem rediculous to me.

Who on the xmen can hurt him?

Originally posted by carver9
Scott just said the same thing.

http://img503.imageshack.us/img503/7003/82709674rp3.jpg

Why would two people from the xmen call him invulnerable if they can scratch or cause him harm? Is that two hyperbole statements battlehammer?

Originally posted by carver9
Who on the xmen can hurt him?

emma could pull a nova and mind rape him into lowering his confidence and simply have colossus beat on him.

profx could do similar ect.

Originally posted by Battlehammer
thats funny because thats the same issue if not mistaken were cannonball does hurt him with a punch, and even causes glad to second guess him self.

Wrong, thats not the same issue and Cannonball didnt do anything to Glads except absorb his punch and knock him a couple of feat with Gladiators own strength. Gladiator didnt have a scratch or showed no sign of pain in that entire fight and you do know that Gladiator was toying with Cannonball right (he even stated it during the fight)?

Originally posted by Battlehammer
Wolverine stated he the best fighter on the planet.......clearly he must be right? I mean it about his own abilities.

You can't show me evidence of the fight ever beeing shown on pannel. all we have are statements. Because some one says that glads, beat the entire x-men team with out being scratched were to assume that evidence in debates? So by the same logic we should take wolverine word that he the best fighter on the planet. I mean he stated it, and it was about his own abilities no less.

perhaps I don't, perhaps I do.

Wolverine stating something about himself without any proof that collobrates his claim, is a hyperbole, especially when there's evidence to the contrary. Spiderman recounting something that happened in the past, not a hyperbole.

The evidence that the fight happened is the fact that it has been referenced multiple times. You keep trying to compare instances that have no relationship. Which might be the reason you keep using the word hyperbole incorrectly. I'm not talking about the X-men/Glads discussion.

You don't.

Originally posted by carver9
Wrong, thats not the same issue and Cannonball didnt do anything to Glads except absorb his punch and knock him a couple of feat with Gladiators own strength. Gladiator didnt have a scratch or showed no sign of pain in that entire fight and you do know that Gladiator was toying with Cannonball right (he even stated it during the fight)?

Originally posted by carver9
Wrong, thats not the same issue and Cannonball didnt do anything to Glads except absorb his punch and knock him a couple of feat with Gladiators own strength. Gladiator didnt have a scratch or showed no sign of pain in that entire fight and you do know that Gladiator was toying with Cannonball right (he even stated it during the fight)?

Originally posted by Battlehammer
Oh I am impressed, I just dislike when people try and uses statements made that were never shown as evidence. It not even that I don't believe glads could do it, it the fact that it never been shown and to uses a random statement as evidence in a forum match seem rediculous to me.

I see.

Originally posted by Battlehammer
depending on the line up. pheniox could easily hurt him.

emma could pull a nova and mind rape him into lowering his confidence and simply have colossus beat on him.

profx could do similar ect.

Are you talking about Rachel phoenix who got one shotted?

http://img116.imageshack.us/img116/5052/52420613mg3.jpg
http://img116.imageshack.us/img116/6796/77372460ou2.jpg

Yet again

http://img14.imageshack.us/img14/2394/50988699.jpg
http://img5.imageshack.us/img5/2844/71744606.jpg

Then the rest of the xmen

http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/8125/65500345.jpg

Show me that scratch BattleHammer

Originally posted by Mindset

The evidence that the fight happened is the fact that it has been referenced multiple times. You keep trying to compare instances that have no relationship. Which might be the reason you keep using the word hyperbole incorrectly. I'm not talking about the X-men/Glads discussion.

Hyperbole: I am the smartest and most handsome person who has ever lived.

Not hyperbole: I am the smartest and most handsome person alive.