Originally posted by Shakyamunisonnone, but the plane of existance came first 😄
Colossus-Big C, try this...Imagine two universes, both just like our universe. One universe started 13 billion years ago, and the other one started right now. The only difference between these universes is that time is running backward as respect to each other. That would mean the universe that started right now was 13 billion years old when the other universe came into existence. Which universe came first?
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Colossus-Big C, try this...Imagine two universes, both just like our universe. One universe started 13 billion years ago, and the other one started right now. The only difference between these universes is that time is running backward as respect to each other. That would mean the universe that started right now was 13 billion years old when the other universe came into existence. Which universe came first?
You just told us.
Originally posted by Wild Shadowi dont think god has a physical form and if he created one i doubt he would choose to look like that to humanity
him.
Originally posted by Shakyamunisonthey came to existance a way unconcievable to us because we use time to describe start and end and there was no time before it so there were always there but its just unconcievable to describe an origion.....
There is no plane of existence in my story. Only two universes exist in this multiverse, and the multiverse is a product of the two universes.
Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
they came to existance a way unconcievable to us because we use time to describe start and end and there was no time before it so there were always there but its just unconcievable to describe an origion.....
And that is why asking about time, as in respect to a multiverse, is an inappropriate question.
Originally posted by Colossus-Big Cnot all gods are omnipotent and some would even question the omnipotence and omniscience of the current popular god of the main stream religions.
if hes not omnipotent hes not god though.
your creator is ur creator no matter what you expect or think.
might as well tell your parents they are not your parents b/c they dont look like you or they are not what you expect them to be even though they gave birth to you.
what of these higher plane of existence beings gave us life by genetic manipulation or even in creating this universe and their race name was Yahweh, what would you say to that?
Originally posted by Wild Shadowwould be better if i say creater then and not describe him?
not all gods are omnipotent and some would even question the omnipotence and omniscience of the current popular god of the main stream religions.your creator is ur creator no matter what you expect or think.
might as well tell your parents they are not your parents b/c they dont look like you or they are not what you expect them to be even though they gave birth to day.
what of these higher plane of existence beings gave us life by genetic manipulation or even in creating this universe and their race name was Yahweh, what would you say to that?
also the yahweh part is possibile atleast
Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
thing? that can create or be a him...
If you call a god a “him” then you are giving that god a male body. A male body makes a him. This contradicts your statement:
i dont think god has a physical form and if he created one i doubt he would choose to look like that to humanity
If you believe what you said, then you should not call your god a “he” or “him”.
Also, don’t you think that “she” would be more appropriate? After all it is a woman who gives birth to humans, and not a man.
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
If you call a god a “him” then you are giving that god a male body. A male body makes a him. This contradicts your statement:If you believe what you said, then you should not call your god a “he” or “him”.
Also, don’t you think that “she” would be more appropriate? After all it is a woman who gives birth to humans, and not a man.
Actually he is the generic pronoun for a living thing in English.
The phrase "he who hesitates is lost" refers to men, women, unichs, hermaphrodites, aliens, gods, animals, computers . . .
Feminists (evil, nasty feminists) have been trying to change that for decades but it still persists.
Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Actually he is the generic pronoun for a living thing in English.The phrase "he who hesitates is lost" refers to men, women, unichs, hermaphrodites, aliens, gods, animals, computers . . .
Feminists (evil, nasty feminists) have been trying to change that for decades but it still persists.
Stupid English. They probably thought women were just vessels for their sperm to become a baby.
Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Actually he is the generic pronoun for a living thing in English.The phrase "he who hesitates is lost" refers to men, women, unichs, hermaphrodites, aliens, gods, animals, computers . . .
Feminists (evil, nasty feminists) have been trying to change that for decades but it still persists.