Immortality Vs Invincibility

Started by Omega Vision4 pages

Originally posted by Knowsbleed33
Being invincible should make you immune to the ravages of time. After all, aging is an attack on the body.

It would also make you immune to your lover's touch.

I saw that, thanks. I was giving an opinion that was OT.

Originally posted by Knowsbleed33
I saw that, thanks. I was giving an opinion that was OT.

K.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
K.

That wasn't directed at you.

Originally posted by Knowsbleed33
That wasn't directed at you.

Alright. The lack of quotes made that hard to tell.

Originally posted by Knowsbleed33
That wasn't directed at you.
K

😛

Originally posted by Omega Vision
Alright. The lack of quotes made that hard to tell.

Kiss me you fool.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
It would also make you immune to your lover's touch.

not necessarily, immunity to pain might just nullify nociception or the sensation of disconfort generated in the brain, not the other forms of touch perception

I would take immortality if I could give it up voluntarilly, otherwise invulnerabilty

Originally posted by 753
not necessarily, immunity to pain might just nullify nociception or the sensation of disconfort generated in the brain, not the other forms of touch perception

I would take immortality if I could give it up voluntarilly, otherwise invulnerabilty


Right but there's more than just immunity to pain. I look at Superman, someone who can literally bathe in the sun's plasma without much if any discomfort and yet can somehow feel Lois's warmth. He can't feel a grenade exploding next to him yet when people tap him on the shoulder he can feel that clearly. It doesn't add up.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
Right but there's more than just immunity to pain. I look at Superman, someone who can literally bathe in the sun's plasma without much if any discomfort and yet can somehow feel Lois's warmth. He can't feel a grenade exploding next to him yet when people tap him on the shoulder he can feel that clearly. It doesn't add up.

intensity of sensorial perception is logarithmic in nature: a 1000 fold increase in the intensity of the stimulus (sound potency), for instance, only causes a 10 fold increase in the intensity of the perceived sensation (perceived sound volume) - this is a real biological property of living organisms. SM's senses can make sense simply by operating the same way over a wider spectrum of stimuli

Invincibility.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
Right but there's more than just immunity to pain. I look at Superman, someone who can literally bathe in the sun's plasma without much if any discomfort and yet can somehow feel Lois's warmth. He can't feel a grenade exploding next to him yet when people tap him on the shoulder he can feel that clearly. It doesn't add up.
yes it does. your pain sensors are completely isolated from your touch receptors. it is entirely possible to feel no pain but be able to sense someone touching you

OK here's another one, what would his mitochondriums do? 🙂

Originally posted by Parmaniac
OK here's another one, what would his mitochondriums do? 🙂

they use the force to eat gravity so he can fly

Originally posted by Knowsbleed33
Kiss me you fool.

Ha.

how about sex, do you think a person with immunity to pain can fell sex?

Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
how about sex, do you think a person with immunity to pain can fell sex?
unless pain is what makes you get off, no. as ive already stated, you have BOTH pain receptors and touch receptors; they are two different things

i though they were the same exact thing but at different lvls of stimuli not two separate nerve endings..

Nocireceptors (pain receptors) are different entities from Mechano, Thermo and Chemo receptors. Your pain receptors could plausibly work differently while the others remain normal.

i'll wiki it soon not that i dont trust you.