Team vs Abomination

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
He's not invulnerable, where is it ever stated that is is vulnerable to nothing?

If we know he's not vulnerable to nothing, and we know he has no healing, then we know he's not going to get anything done. He's smaller, he's not as strong.

What is he ever going to do? Hulk wore a police car as gloves, Abom is bigger than Hulk. Thing isn't big enough to do that.

-AC

It's shown, by him not taking damage. Doom pounded on him, tossed him; even hit him with a full blow of his lightning, Thing took no visible damage.

In part 2, he took a helicopter blade to the face, and was slammed a couple of feet into a brick wall by a flying steel door he took to the face, again, no visible damage.

He's likely not as strong, but he is strong. Rolling a Porsche 911 into a small ball in a matter of seconds is a good feat. Not saying he could win, even with this team helping him, but he's not going out quickly.

Originally posted by Robtard
It's shown, by him not taking damage. Doom pounded on him, tossed him; even hit him with a full blow of his lightning, Thing took no visible damage.

In part 2, he took a helicopter blade to the face, and was slammed a couple of feet into a brick wall by a flying steel door he took to the face, again, no visible damage.

He's likely not as strong, but he is strong. Rolling a Porsche 911 into a small ball in a matter of seconds is a good feat. Not saying he could win, even with this team helping him, but he's not going out quickly.

I'll ask again. Where is it stated that he is invulnerable? He is shown to be resistant, highly resistent, to damage. Never is it stated or shown that he is vulnerable to NOTHING. That's what invulnerable means in comic character/movie adaptation terms.

He took no visible damage from certain things. Explain how this means nothing can ever harm him.

-AC

Alright, calm down, my verbiage was wrong. He wasn't harmed in either film, not sure Adomination could output his resistance to damage.

Originally posted by Robtard
Alright, calm down, my verbiage was wrong. He wasn't harmed in either film, not sure Adomination could output his resistance to damage.

Oh dear, not you too.

You're better than the "Calm down." tactic, dude. That's for people who can't debate or trolling.

-AC

It was humor, I don't actually think you're excited and emotional over a comic book movie fight discussion.

Originally posted by Robtard
It was humor, I don't actually think you're excited and emotional over a comic book movie fight discussion.

WELL THINK AGAIN, SHITPIECE!

-AC

First time I've ever been called a "shitpiece", I'll get back to you later on my feelings on it, need to think about it.

Originally posted by Robtard
It's shown, by him not taking damage. Doom pounded on him, tossed him; even hit him with a full blow of his lightning, Thing took no visible damage.

In part 2, he took a helicopter blade to the face, and was slammed a couple of feet into a brick wall by a flying steel door he took to the face, again, no visible damage.

He's likely not as strong, but he is strong. Rolling a Porsche 911 into a small ball in a matter of seconds is a good feat. Not saying he could win, even with this team helping him, but he's not going out quickly.

and he press lifted a significant load contributed from the millenium eye in part 2

Originally posted by ankur29
and he press lifted a significant load contributed from the millenium eye in part 2

While true, we don't really know how much of the weight Reed and Sue were taking on themselves.

aaahahahaahah load.

Could abomination cause internal damage? That's what I thought
doom was going to do before sue stopped him.

Thing's organs are made of the rock-like substance too, Reed says so.

Yeah, ok.

You're all alone and you have to pick either Thing or Abomination to protect you from the other.

Do you hide behind Thing or Abomination?

We all know the answer because we all know who is a better, bigger, stronger fighter.

-AC

Could Corvin contribute anything?