Originally posted by WickedDynamite
The scan was just for giggles...we know is from the xmen cartoon of the 90s.Are Juggs fans really that paranoid that every feat that Juggs loses there is a reasonable explanation for him losing?
daaammmn.... 😬
Are Juggernaut haters so pathetic they have to reference non-canon material to low-ball the character?
Originally posted by WickedDynamite
The scan was just for giggles...we know is from the xmen cartoon of the 90s.Are Juggs fans really that paranoid that every feat that Juggs loses there is a reasonable explanation for him losing?
daaammmn.... 😬
Originally posted by the ninjak
Yeah but throwing Juggs isn't cutting him.
heh, a non-canon scan of gladiator not cutting juggernaut.... oh brother
Originally posted by Mshinu
Shatterstar`s sword cut Juggs but Mjolnir has failed to do any damage again and again... Hmm is he immune to blunt force even if magical then?
Not all magical swords/weapons can harm him. It really depends on the type of magic and how powerful it is. But more importantly, it depends on the writer.
^ I've been thinking that as long as the attack doesn't involve stopping or halting Juggernaut's momentum, then his forcefield doesn't turn on. So if you try to slash him, you strike the armor directly and his armor is relatively invincible (but capable of being damaged). But if you try to push him back with an attack, i.e., Mjolnir toss, then the forcefield's up and he's virtually invincible.
So his forcefield (which makes him virtually invulnerable) is directly tied to his momentum enchantment.
I think this explanation helps explain certain circumstances, e.g., his armor getting shredded by claws contrasted with his forcefield completely negating a Mjolnir-toss. The former has nothing to do with momentum enchantment and the latter does. So he only seems more invincible to the latter type of situations than he does to the former type. But there're probably holes to poke in this No-Prize attempt as well.
Originally posted by OneDumbG0
^ I've been thinking that as long as the attack doesn't involve stopping or halting Juggernaut's momentum, then his forcefield doesn't turn on. So if you try to slash him, you strike the armor directly and his armor is relatively invincible (but capable of being damaged). But if you try to push him back with an attack, i.e., Mjolnir toss, then the forcefield's up and he's virtually invincible.So his forcefield (which makes him virtually invulnerable) is directly tied to his momentum enchantment.
I think this explanation helps explain certain circumstances, e.g., his armor getting shredded by claws contrasted with his forcefield completely negating a Mjolnir-toss. The former has nothing to do with momentum enchantment and the latter does. So he only seems more invincible to the latter type of situations than he does to the former type. But there're probably holes to poke in this No-Prize attempt as well.
His FF certainly isn't tied to his unstoppability. He said in MU #150 that he basically only used the FF when he didn't want people to touch him., and since the FF can actually stop and redirect another object/persons momentum, it makes sense.
A shadow-forged sword being swung by a class 90 bounced off his bare skin.