Originally posted by Bardock42
Nah, you both made the same mistake by not specifying the context change you made from the post you were quoting.
Incorrect. Context was defined between Robtard and I. Robtard got off track (not that that is a bad thing, he was just curious), I brought it back.
Originally posted by Bardock42
Ms. Marvel made the mistake of using unclear language, on the other hand though she was under the impression that the topic was clear on account of you replying directly to what Robtard said.
Incorrect.
She simply used the wrong legal terms. It doesn't matter what Ms. Marvel meant: it was wrong and I responded as such.
No context was even required because, no matter the context, Aggravated Assault* had not been stated as of yet. That's the felony charge. Assault is a completely different charge. If you tried to pass off "implied context" with legal terms, you'd end up in a pile of legal problems that could even lead to your own prosecution. Very very bad. Guess what my point was by replying to her post with a very simple "this is incorrect" type posts? To illustrate why simply calling it assault is incorrect.
*If you want to go down the path that a Assault with a Deadly Weapon charge also qualfies as Aggravated Assault, fine. We'll talk about that.