Originally posted by Doctor-Alvis
I don't remember anybody ripping the buildings apart like they were made of particle board or kicking people across the room with a flick of their toe in text excerpts in the comics.
Well, they did show Ozy tossing a 250-pound man (The Comedian) out of a reinforced window in the comic.
On top of that, he caught a bullet in the same manner as the movie.
I don't think he wins against batman, but to imply that the movie Ozy is far superior to the comic character is simply not true.
Batman. He has so many more feats that it really isn't even funny. Throwing a 250 lb man through a reinforced glass window is in no way out of Batman's level of ability. Sure Ozy caught a bullet, but he that is about his only valid feat that is impressive. Also catching a bullet is stupid, why catch a bullet when you could dodge it?
I'm going with the man who has demonstrated the ability to lift 1,000 pounds over his head, knows at least 127 forms of combat, and literally has decades of feats to back him up instead of one graphic novel.
Originally posted by LunacydeI'm just going to say this.I hate it when people say that.Your saying batman has more feats.Your implying that thats why he wins.Just because batman is in more comics doesn't mean he is stronger.Thats like saying daredevil>Juggarnaut because matt is in more comics.
Batman. He has so many more feats that it really isn't even funny. Throwing a 250 lb man through a reinforced glass window is in no way out of Batman's level of ability. Sure Ozy caught a bullet, but he that is about his only valid feat that is impressive. Also catching a bullet is stupid, why catch a bullet when you could dodge it?I'm going with the man who has demonstrated the ability to lift 1,000 pounds over his head, knows at least 127 forms of combat, and literally has decades of feats to back him up instead of one graphic novel.
Originally posted by Black bolt z
I'm just going to say this.I hate it when people say that.Your saying batman has more feats.Your implying that thats why he wins.Just because batman is in more comics doesn't mean he is stronger.Thats like saying daredevil>Juggarnaut because matt is in more comics.
Lolwtf?
That is one of the worst analogies you could possibly make. If Daredevil had superior feats to Juggernaut, then you're analogy would be acceptable, but he doesn't. However, if the above were true, then you're entire argument would be null, as it would generally be accepted that DD is superior.
In any case, people like to use the example of Ozymandias throwing the Comedian through a reinforced window as an indication of his strength. I'll give you a directly comparable feat of Batman's that is >>>>>>>> Ozymandias' feat.
Batman throws Dr. Death through a reinforced metal door that was built to withstand cruise missiles.
http://i289.photobucket.com/albums/ll223/darknight2k/batmissiledoor1.jpg
http://i289.photobucket.com/albums/ll223/darknight2k/batmissiledoor2.jpg
The bottom line is that Batman is simply better than Ozymandias in every category.
Originally posted by batdude123
Lolwtf?That is one of the worst analogies you could possibly make. If Daredevil had superior feats to Juggernaut, then you're analogy would be acceptable, but he doesn't. However, if the above were true, then you're entire argument would be null, as it would generally be accepted that DD is superior.
In any case, people like to use the example of Ozymandias throwing the Comedian through a reinforced window as an indication of his strength. I'll give you a directly comparable feat of Batman's that is >>>>>>>> Ozymandias' feat.
Batman throws Dr. Death through a reinforced metal door that was built to withstand cruise missiles.
http://i289.photobucket.com/albums/ll223/darknight2k/batmissiledoor1.jpg
http://i289.photobucket.com/albums/ll223/darknight2k/batmissiledoor2.jpgThe bottom line is that Batman is simply [b]better
than Ozymandias in every category. [/B]
Also:
http://shortpacked.com/comics-archive/2006-09-18-howareyou.png
Originally posted by batdude123What I was talking about is some people day that someone is better then someone else because they have more feats.For the amound of info we have on ozy we have to take from that and those are impressive feats.
Lolwtf?That is one of the worst analogies you could possibly make. If Daredevil had superior feats to Juggernaut, then you're analogy would be acceptable, but he doesn't. However, if the above were true, then you're entire argument would be null, as it would generally be accepted that DD is superior.
In any case, people like to use the example of Ozymandias throwing the Comedian through a reinforced window as an indication of his strength. I'll give you a directly comparable feat of Batman's that is >>>>>>>> Ozymandias' feat.
Batman throws Dr. Death through a reinforced metal door that was built to withstand cruise missiles.
http://i289.photobucket.com/albums/ll223/darknight2k/batmissiledoor1.jpg
http://i289.photobucket.com/albums/ll223/darknight2k/batmissiledoor2.jpgThe bottom line is that Batman is simply [b]better
than Ozymandias in every category. [/B]
Originally posted by Lord_TalronThis is true.Obivously the door was not that strong.
"maybe i was wrong about that door"thats either big-time PIS or the door was much weaker than thought. cmon, be smart, bats doesnt have that type of str
Originally posted by Lord_Talron
"maybe i was wrong about that door"thats either big-time PIS or the door was much weaker than thought. cmon, be smart, bats doesnt have that type of str
Dr. Death is one of the smartest scientists on the face of the planet.
Regardless of what you want to nitpick at, it's pretty undeniable that that feat by Batman is more impressive than Ozymandias'.
And in any case, there's are tons upon TONS of feats to pull from that showcase the fact that Batman is superior to Ozymandias outside of the one example I used. Do you want to label all of those feats PIS too?
Originally posted by Black bolt z
What I was talking about is some people day that someone is better then someone else because they have more feats.For the amound of info we have on ozy we have to take from that and those are impressive feats.
You're missing the point.
The justification behind Batman's superiority isn't simply that "he's in more comics than Ozymandias." Nobody is saying that.
Originally posted by RomulusX
Well, they did show Ozy tossing a 250-pound man (The Comedian) out of a reinforced window in the comic.On top of that, he caught a bullet in the same manner as the movie.
I don't think he wins against batman, but to imply that the movie Ozy is far superior to the comic character is simply not true.
Originally posted by Black bolt z
I'm just going to say this.I hate it when people say that.Your saying batman has more feats.Your implying that thats why he wins.Just because batman is in more comics doesn't mean he is stronger.Thats like saying daredevil>Juggarnaut because matt is in more comics.
You are misinterpreting what I wrote. I am not saying that Batman wins because he has been in more comics, I am saying that Batman wins because for every feat you give me for Ozy I can find multiple for Batman that are equally impressive or possibly even more so. I am basicallly saying the factual base of my argument has a lot more evidence to back it, therefore is much more sound than a defense of Ozy which is based on a handful of feats in one Graphic novel.
