Pre Retconned Mxy Vs Molecule man

Anyways I had posted these before on another site. I was lucky and managed to successfuly copy the links.

ONE universe:

T'was a multiverse:

And since the comic that scan is from (Lucifer: Nirvana) was released after the main series ended, it's information is more current, thus more canonical, than the info you posted.

^ The top 4 aren't even written by Neil Gaiman.

LOL at Lucifer only being MJJ level

Originally posted by TheTyrant
quote: (post)
Originally posted by TheTyrant
He also couldn't reverse Ruin's doings. Even someone like Galactus could have easily reversed Alex/Alexandra's transformations.
quote: (post)
Originally posted by galactusischere
Yea, that's the showing in Adventures of Superman #635 that really made me question Mxy' power. And the one with Prime.

I personally don't see how Mxy could defeat the LT, let alone Molecule Man.

------------------------

I don't want this to be overlooked.

Why do you keep reposting the same shit?

Because it has yet to be addressed.

It's obviously because nobody wants to address it and reposting it is basically spamming

Originally posted by TheTyrant
Because it has yet to be addressed.

How dare u. Splinters are very painful. The Egyptian was smart to fear the wrath of embedded wood in his skin.

Tyrant, stop reposting the same thing. It's not your decision if people want to address what you posted or ignore it.

Now back to the topic.

Originally posted by Galan007
T'was a multiverse:

And since the comic that scan is from (Lucifer: Nirvana) was released after the main series ended, it's information is more current, thus more canonical, than the info you posted.

Who is that in your sig?

Originally posted by Prep-Man
Who is that in your sig?

Originally posted by Digi
Kinda what I thought too. Wouldn't anything created be a part of the multiverse, and therefore unable to be more durable than itself? It's like a contradiction wrapped in a tautology.

I'm curious as to what property of it is its measure of durability.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
How would you know? "Fully Backed" Spectre is a hypothetical being like "infinite strength Hulk" that has never been on panel so for all we know he could be >>>>> LT.

The Fully Backed Spectre would be essentially just God's Hand doing His work, basically like the HOTU was for the TOAA.

If that's the case how could the imps defeat him? Or was he not fully backed by the presence? Aren't the Imps far below the presence? Is that shit with destroying and remaking the multiverse every week cannon? How do his much lower feats in DC continuity fit into this?

Originally posted by Doctor-Alvis
Also that.

I'm curious as to what property of it is its measure of durability.

This thread is actually pre retcon MM vs wf mxy is that it?

Originally posted by 753
If that's the case how could the imps defeat him? Or was he not fully backed by the presence? Aren't the Imps far below the presence? Is that shit with destroying and remaking the multiverse every week cannon? How do his much lower feats in DC continuity fit into this?

1. mxy is far more powerful than all the imps combined
2. his non cannon feats are usable here

Yo.

Originally posted by galactusischere
There was no omniverse back then. Only a multi-verse and it was made clear than both Beyonder and MM were faaaaar beyond it.

quick question: wats the effective difference between a multi- & an omni- verse??

Tazer

Originally posted by 753
If that's the case how could the imps defeat him? Or was he not fully backed by the presence? Aren't the Imps far below the presence? Is that shit with destroying and remaking the multiverse every week cannon? How do his much lower feats in DC continuity fit into this?

Originally posted by Omega Vision
Obviously he wasn't fully backed.

Then I dont think they're above LT level and by extension MM level even if that feat is bigger than his. I'd say PR MM could destroy and recreate the marvel multiverse as well.