Four Greatest Military Minds Play Risk

Started by Wild Shadow3 pagesPoll

Which modern day Napoleon wins?

Four Greatest Military Minds Play Risk

Kim Jong-il
George W. Bush
Adolf Hitler
Saddam Hussein

these four men sit down and open the box containing risk..

who wins and why?

who gets what color who decides or how is it decided?

is the game too complicated/ or should they just play Halo?

seriously how do you see these guys tactical military skills stacking up against one another..

Rommel, Patton, Napoleon, Sun Tzu, Macarthur, Caesar, Grant, Lee? Where are the real greats?

Kim Jong-il, evil, dumb dictator.
George W. Bush, stupid, harmless ninnymuggins.
Adolf hitler, idiot
Saddam hussein, idiot

none of those people had ever shown any military genius.

Agreed, these were all just spineless politicians who never did any of the real fighting. Mmm, but I think Kim Jong would be the winner, I think he did have some military experience.

Originally posted by Liberator
Agreed, these were all just spineless politicians who never did any of the real fighting. Mmm, but I think Kim Jong would be the winner, I think he did have some military experience.

So did Hitler.

Sure, but not one of his victories could be attributed to his knowledge or military prowess.

Why is GWB a "great military mind"...couldn't we pick someone who successfully ran wars, not a politician who effed 2 up?

Although all these four men have military training and knowledge of combat skills...I seriously doubt they would sit down and play a game of Risk.

Risk is for Nerds.

whoever knows the australia trick

weres napolian ?
or general lieutenant commander George Marshall?

You guys do realise he's just making fun of them right? By, y'know, ironically saying they're great thinkers when really they're complete twats.

edit: I'm going with Hitler becuase he would go for teh blitz to the face. With his fist. And becuase I always thought his mustache was kewl.

edit2: Plus Hitler would own at Halo.

Kim Jong Il starts closest to Austrailia

so... him?

Originally posted by WickedDynamite

Risk is for Nerds.

I guess Hitler from the options. The Waffengruppe was always feared from what I remember.

Originally posted by Nephthys

edit: I'm going with Hitler because he would go for teh blitz to the face. With his fist. And because I always thought his mustache was kewl.

hitlerhis mustache is pure evil 😐

anyways i thought it was pretty obvious what i was implying with the OP and title some ppl just over think things too much, right? or they dont get sarcasm

Nuh-uh, hitler attacks everyone at the same time ruthlessly, pissing them off so they unite and attack him.

I would actually go with sadaam. He has defeated smaller countries and survived at least one war against us.

Gotta go for Adolf, blitzkrieg and double crossing your allies always gets you far.

who did hitler double cross?

i should have added this guy as well..

Mikhail Gorbachev
http://www.google.com/images?hl=en&q=Mikhail%20Gorbachev&um=1&ie=UTF-8&source=og&sa=N&tab=wi

i wish a mod could add it to my voting poll.. 😇

Hitler made an agreement with Russia, saying he woulnd´t attack them🙂

Hmm yeah and Hitler did have World War 1 experience... but he was an absolutely horrible strategist. The fact he went to war with Russia proves that.

what about G. dubba U.. Bush military experience?

he was a pilot which made him an officer.. 📖