Who has better weapons and fighting training

Originally posted by King Kandy
They're hired to be smart not tough.

" you have to do what i tell you.. i am a G15 something or other i out rank your general.. now do what i say or else"..

marine: f%#@ you @$$hole.. try it.. its us against you motherf$@^^er... how long you think you last out here with us in the desert you think any marine here will side with u against anyone of us.. 😗

this may or may not have happen.. this may or may not be a fictional story... no need for the company to look any deeper into this

Originally posted by One Free Man
Yes, there are no super spies.

That's exactly what we would think if there were super spies.

Originally posted by Wild Shadow
they are morons and the act as if they are tough.. making it worse..

" you have to do what i tell you.. i am a G15 something or other i out rank your general.. now do what i say or else"..

marine: f%#@ you @$$hole.. try it.. its us against you motherf$@^^er... how long you think you last out here with us in the desert you think any marine here will side with u against anyone of us.. 😗

this may or may not have happen.. this may or may not be a fictional story... no need for the company to look any deeper into this

What circumstance would lead to a CIA agent commanding marines directly?

a dumbf$@$^ on a power trip.. who over stepped his boundaries and thinks we marines are their personal servants to peck and call..

honestly you can be attached to them only as security but you still have your own chain of command who orders you directly.. not the agent even though sometimes they may make suggestions. i never bn in a security sitaution with an agent..

but i have had altercations with one of them over personal reasons along with my crew/section that had nothing to do with a mission.

we laughed at his dumb@$$ and ordered him to leave our secured area or we would follow procedure to the letter.. *bang* hypothetically if it happen at all.. not saying it did just making scenarios for my story i am working on...

If we're talking one on one fighting sans weapons, I'd go with Army. The marines are great, but one on one the Army's style of fighting (forget what it's called) has more to do with grapples and real-word techniques than the Marine's. And obviously the Navy and AF doesn't have the training to take either in one on one.

If we're talking about Army vs Navy vs Marine Corps vs Air Force, I have to go with Navy. The Navy literally has the ability to bombard any part of the world. A Naval fleet, once stocked, can operate for months on end at sea. Put a carrier battle group against the Army or Marines, and they're destroyed before either even has a chance to retaliate. They simply can't reach a carrier group. Put the AF against the Navy and, well, the Navy has more fighters and bombers than the AF does as far as I know. Plus a carrier group not only has fighters and bombers, but destroyers, amphibs, etc. Simply put, the Navy is able to kill from long distances while the other services are relatively limited in scope.

And as far as Spec Ops, if it's Navy vs, say, rangers, obviously the rangers lose. There simply aren't enough of them.