Thanos with the infinity gauntlet vs Krona.

Originally posted by Omega Vision

As seen below you clearly made a blanket statement pertaining to both:

Now you switch to the tried and true "well Marvel never recognized it so nyeh"

Anyone who reads Trinity and never read JLA/Avengers,
would have NO idea that Marvel was involved with Krona back them,
since Trinity makes NO mention of anything even resembling Marvel.

It's like a retcon, not only is Krona WAYYYY weaker in Trinity,
but his history has also changed concerning the Marvel aspect of the comedy.

Originally posted by Mr Master
Homie, if the DC update in Trinity ONLY involves DC,
then whatever happened in the cross-over is moot concerning a connection of the two.

Anyone who reads Trinity and never read JLA/Avengers,
would have NO idea that Marvel was involved with Krona back them,
since Trinity makes NO mention of anything even resembling Marvel.

It's like a retcon, not only is Krona WAYYYY weaker in Trinity,
but his history has also changed concerning the Marvel aspect of the comedy.

Originally posted by lightyeargee

And Wolverine is an animal that God created and yet Marvel has the term or name Wolverine Trade Marked. Infinity is also Trademarked as well as Eternity. Need I go on? Your argument was cute tho.

Originally posted by lightyeargee

Marvel had to give explicit permission,
which also means,
they aso recognize the events of JLAvengers to be canon.

Originally posted by lightyeargee
Why are you calling it a comedy? Because you don't like it?

Originally posted by lightyeargee

Why are you calling it a comedy? Because you don't like it?

Which is not only comedy, but horse shit ...

That's aside from all the absurdness that ran rampant across the arc.

Originally posted by Mr Master
Homie, if the DC update in Trinity ONLY involves DC,
then whatever happened in the cross-over is moot concerning a connection of the two.

Anyone who reads Trinity and never read JLA/Avengers,
would have NO idea that Marvel was involved with Krona back them,
since Trinity makes NO mention of anything even resembling Marvel.

It's like a retcon, not only is Krona WAYYYY weaker in Trinity,
but his history has also changed concerning the Marvel aspect of the comedy.

I'm not trying to argue that the crossover is canon to both Universes, only that your original statement that the crossover itself had no impact is utter crap. Something you seem to have difficulty admitting:

Originally posted by Mr Master
Because DC & Marvel share the same Multiverse in it.

Which is not only comedy, but horse shit ...

That's aside from all the absurdness that ran rampant across the arc.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
The Cosmic Egg also appeared in JLA 107 though.

I'm not trying to argue that the crossover is canon to both Universes, only that your original statement that the crossover itself had no impact is utter crap. Something you seem to have difficulty admitting:

Seriouslsy, your bestiality fetishes are not necessary to strengthen your argument.

Originally posted by Omega Vision

The Cosmic Egg also appeared in JLA 107 though.

I'm not trying to argue that the crossover is canon to both Universes, only that your original statement that the crossover itself had no impact is utter crap. Something you seem to have difficulty admitting:

Please, if you can't comprehend what I'm saying. just ignore me.

Originally posted by Mr Master
Seriouslsy, your bestiality fetishes are not necessary to strengthen your argument.

The Cosmic Egg can be mentioned in every story that was ever been produced by DC,
and it still has no bearing on the fact
that the cross-over is meaningless where Marvel is concerned.

Please, if you can't comprehend what I'm saying. just ignore me.

Originally posted by lightyeargee

They didn't share the same Multiverse. Even you yourself says that Eternity is the Multiverse. And Kismet was the DC multiverse. So how could they share the same Multiverse if Kismet and Eternity were both in it? They share the same Omniverse. All things fiction which is a term Mark Gruenwald made popular.

Eternity is the Multiverse in official Marvel comics, and his form stretches across all creation.

Eternity/Kismet was part of a single Multiverse in the JLA/Avengers arc.

Marvel has its own Omniverse.

I, and many others here, have proven this time and time again.

(with On Panel and Handbook unshakable proof)

Originally posted by Mr Master
Seriouslsy, your bestiality fetishes are not necessary to strengthen your argument.

The Cosmic Egg can be mentioned in every story that was ever been produced by DC,
and it still has no bearing on the fact
that the cross-over is meaningless where Marvel is concerned.

Please, if you can't comprehend what I'm saying. just ignore me.

Oh I comprehend what you're saying. I also comprehend the fact that you're dodging my real point. Where the **** did I say it effected Marvel? I'm saying it effected DC and even though you're too much of a Marvel Zombie to care about that side of the fence it doesn't change the fact that the crossover had an effect on that company.

Originally posted by lightyeargee

Monica Rambeau's Bio mentions that Cross over. And a few others from marvel. If it's meaningless where Marvel is concerned why did they mention it?

Show me one bio where any DC character name is mentioned.

Show me where in any official Marvel title is the title JLA/Avengers mentioned.

Don't come at me with vague impossible to define referrences from two bios.
If it's canon, then Marvel should have no fear of lawsuits in writing the actual names.

I gotta go, we'll continue this some other time.

And there is no way that DC and eternity share the same omniverse because 616 spand out and creates the marvle omniverse.So unless 616 created DC they don't share the omniverse.

Originally posted by Black bolt z
And there is no way that DC and eternity share the same omniverse because 616 spand out and creates the marvle omniverse.So unless 616 created DC they don't share the omniverse.

Originally posted by Mr Master
facepalm

Eternity is the Multiverse in official Marvel comics, and his form stretches across all creation.

Eternity/Kismet was part of a single Multiverse in the JLA/Avengers arc.

Marvel has its own Omniverse.

I, and many others here, have proven this time and time again.

(with On Panel and Handbook unshakable proof)

Originally posted by Omega Vision
The reason I don't believe there should be an Omniverse is the inability of any company to lay claim to it.

Originally posted by Black bolt z
You mean no specific company controls it?I'm missing your point.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
To be a true Omniverse it would have to include everything (even the real world).

2 different companies,2 different TOAA's,2 different omniverses.

Originally posted by Black bolt z
No because it is still in a comic.Still just a piece of paper.Also there probably is a relfection of the real world but it's still in the comic.

2 different companies,2 different TOAA's,2 different omniverses.