Rage or T Virus - What's Worse?

Started by Darth Truculent1 pages

Rage or T Virus - What's Worse?

Which virus is worse? T virus is weaponized wheras the Rage virus has unknown origins. What is worse?

Re: Rage or T Virus - What's Worse?

Giga-AIDS; ask BackFire, he can tell you all about it.

did the rage virus infect animals? i can't recall.

the stuff from I am Legend is worse than both.

First human infected was infected by a chimp. Though I think it had something to do the the Hominid group.

i think the T-virus is worse; that stuff dried up lakes and killed plant-life.

T Virus, hands down.

T-Virus seems to be worse. It could infect any living thing and destroyed the entire world. And if I am not wrong - no one demonstrated natural immunity against it.

Rage also seems to be very dangerous. The quarantine of London failed to prevent it from spreading. However, some people developed natural immunity against it.

At first I read T-Virus or Rape.

Hm.

Originally posted by NemeBro
At first I read T-Virus or Rape.

Hm.

lulz.

I'd rather get raped than get hit with the t-virus.

Originally posted by Impediment
T Virus, hands down.

As long as it isn't prom night, the rage is the least bit of your worries.