Originally posted by Robtard
Eli's skills come from God, it's a package deal.
Doubtful. If so, then he should be banned from the MVF.
Wait, OP did not specify that Eli was "protecting the book." He has no protection here.
Hopefully Riddick'll be wearing protection as he buries his cock balls deep in Eli's ass.
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Doubtful. If so, then he should be banned from the MVF.Wait, OP did not specify that Eli was "protecting the book." He has no protection here.
Hopefully Riddick'll be wearing protection as he buries his cock balls deep in Eli's ass.
Then he's just a blind-man, so it's a spite thread.
That or you can just accept Riddick loses here, I know it's hard for you.
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
After many conversations about movies with you, I discredit your whole "I watch a movie once and I remember every detail about it forever." I lost count how many times you forgot shit or remembered incorrectly.
A personal attack? ZOMG! That was not expected. 😆
How many times had that happened? Maybe 2...3 times?
You mean you can't count to 3?
Yeah, you bring up movies that I saw in the late 80s, early 90s, that I saw once, and expect me to remember a saying because you love the film so much.
Discredit away.
And how many times have I remembered something from a film that I saw once that you saw multiple times, but you didn't have a clue? Now, that's truly a "lost count" moment.
Here's something on topic from the very scene you are also wrong on: you remembered incorrectly from the Chronicles of Riddick: you said he got shot by a blast, and I said he used a body to block it. I've seen the movie once, you multiple times. You were wrong.
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
This is the part where you flex your E brain and sound all smart and stuff, but deep down you know I am right.
Right, cause Riddick killed 40 guys with his knife, uber fast, right?
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
If all else fails, watch the scene again, closely, even in slo mo. I counted around 30 at regular speed, 40ish in slo mo.
Watch it again count how many Riddick actually killed.
Originally posted by dadudemonPersonal attack? How so? I'm just stating facts.
A personal attack? ZOMG! That was not expected. 😆How many times had that happened? Maybe 2...3 times?
You mean you can't count to 3?
Your hair is black. Your name has seven letters. You like bewbz. See? All facts. Nothing personal about it, I just realized that your memory sucks when it comes to movies.
Yeah, you bring up movies that I saw in the late 80s, early 90s, that I saw once, and expect me to remember a saying because you love the film so much.Example.
Discredit away.OK now you're really full of shit, example.And how many times have I remembered something from a film that I saw once that you saw multiple times, but you didn't have a clue? Now, that's truly a "lost count" moment.
Thought not. You're just lashing out because I stated an observation, TwiBoy.
Khayman, "She" facepalm
Here's something on topic from the very scene you are also wrong on: you remembered incorrectly from the Chronicles of Riddick: you said he got shot by a blast, and I said he used a body to block it. I've seen the movie once, you multiple times. You were wrong.I most certainly never said Riddick was shot, Riddick used the Necro to block the direct force of the shot, he was hit by the concussion.
Douche. Don't be one.
Right, cause Riddick killed 40 guys with his knife, uber fast, right?Riddick killed 40ish guys with multiple knives, with the energy gun, with his hands. There were three where he was swinging Kyra around, if you want to discount those 3, fine, 37ish.Watch it again count how many Riddick actually killed.
Let's se, who has the worst memory....Here we go!!!
I said:
Originally posted by Rogue JediNo it's not, not if we are talking power. Khayman could kick the shit outta any twilight vampire.
.
You replied with this:
Originally posted by dadudemonNo [b]she
wouldn't. That's just more twi-hate coming from you. I've already explained to you how she couldn't do jack, even if she wanted to.[/B]
You referred to Khayman as a SHE, TWICE. This, after bragging how you read the Vampire chronicles cover to cover. A characters sex? That's not something you forget.
So I replied with this:
Originally posted by Rogue JediKhayman is a MAN facepalm I am now convinced you never read the Anne Rice books. TWICE you called Khayman "she", fail, dude, epic fail.
Example one. Result?
Example two?
This little exchange:
I said:
Originally posted by Rogue JediHow? Vampires are damned creatures. Edward even implied it, Twiboy.
You said:
Originally posted by dadudemonOnly Edward believes that. No other main-character vampire does. In fact, the main character, Bella, does not believe that.
I replied with this:
Originally posted by Rogue JediWrong. Carlisle said it in New Moon.
Your reply? Sheer arrogance:
Originally posted by dadudemonWrong. Carlisle did not say it in New Moon. Carlisle said that Edward believed that. You need to either
a) Re-watch New Moon.
or even better
b) Read New Moon.
My reply to that? Epic pwnage. Ass rape:
Originally posted by Rogue Jedihttp://www.twilight-quotes.com/characters/cullen-carlisle
I’m sure all this sounds a little bizarre, coming from a vampire. But I’m hoping that there is still a point to this life, even for us. It’s a long shot, I’ll admit. By all accounts, we’re damned regardless. But I hope, maybe foolishly, that we’ll get some measure of credit for trying.
Carlisle Cullen, New Moon, Chapter 2, p.36BONG. Feel stupid yet? It's as he is tending to Bella's arm.
Your memory is shit.
Result?
Well.......What say you now? Hmm? Hmm? Hmmmmmmmmmmmm?
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Personal attack? How so? I'm just stating facts.Your hair is black. Your name has seven letters. You like bewbz. See? All facts. Nothing personal about it, I just realized that your memory sucks when it comes to movies.
Actually, it's the exact opposite. You know this as fact. But, instead, you pretend it's not true because your ego was hurt when I called our your b.s. 40 number...a number that was already called into question in another thread over a year ago.
If you actually had a good enough memory, you would have recognized that argument and dropped it.
But, keep in mind, I'm the one with a bad memory. 😐
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Example.OK now you're really full of shit, example.
Thought not. You're just lashing out because I stated an observation, TwiBoy.
Khayman, "She" facepalm
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Let's se, who has the worst memory....Here we go!!!I said:
You replied with this:
You referred to Khayman as a SHE, TWICE. This, after bragging how you read the Vampire chronicles cover to cover. A characters sex? That's not something you forget.
So I replied with this:
I'm glad you decided to go down this path.
Are you prepared for this humaliation:
Example:
Laugh it up fuzzball.
You said it was furball.
It was not.
It occurred near the top of a page in a thread, in the OTF, around 2 years ago, and it included, just a bout, a three way conversation between you, Billie, and I.
Han Solo, one of your favorite characters, giving a memorable quote, and you got it wrong and I got it right. How many times have I seen ESB? Twice. How many times have you seen it? I have nooooo idea....but it is definitely more than a dozen times.
Another example: I had to almost beat it into your head clip in the Big Lewbowski, I was referring to, when I said the "fat-man skip." You had no clue what I was talking about and I had to replay the scene, verbally, several times until you finally "remembered." You didn't actually remember, though, you just said you did, watched the movie later on that week, and when we spoke of the movie again, your remembrance of the scene improved greatly.
The second time we spoke about that film, which is after you had watched it again, you misquoted back the scene Walter is beating the shit out of the Vette. You said, "watch what happens, Larry, when you **** a stranger in the ass." I corrected you, and you quickly played it off.
How many times had you watched The Big Lewbowski at the point? A dozen?
There are dozens of situations and scenarios from the Star Wars Prequel Trilogy of numerous occasions I had to remind you of conversations and events that occurred.
To actually answer your question, I didn't even read your entire post. You see, I am so arrogant that I know what someone is going to say without having to read their entire post. It works 99/100 times. I didn't even bother reading beyond the first few words as it was a waste of time (it really was, because the only thing off was a gender reference that I would have picked up on had I read your entire post). I could have sworn it was going to be more Akasha nut swinging, so I referenced a text message conversation that you and I had so you would stop with the BS. Forgive me for not giving a shit about your character name drops because I was being arrogant again? Also, you can call b.s. on what I just told you, but I've already said that I do that on KMC no less than twice, already.
Also, if by bragging about reading Rice's books, you mean this:
John:
"Dude you are a twif*g. Dont deny it."
Dom:
...
"I read all four books."
John:
"Aaaahahahahaaa youre a twif*g!"
Dom:
"I also read Anne Rice's books: does that make me a Rice f*g?"
"I also read the bible, multiple times: does that make me a Jesus f*g?"
John:
"Nah because jesus is epic pwnage. He is the man. Twilight is epic gayness. Anne rices vamps are better in every way.
Dom:
"You won't ever hear [me] talking about how good of a writer Stephanie Meyer is, but you will hear m state that Anne Rice is one of my favorite authors. That doesn't change the fact that I remember lots of shit and can answer questions about something I read."
It would seem you either:
a) Did not remember our conversation.
or
b) Did not understand the context.
Let me put it in simpler words for you:
If having read the books makes me a Twif*g, despite my thoughts on Stephanie Meyer as a writer, then I'm an even bigger Rice f*g because I actually enjoyed her writing style, far more than Meyer's. I read Meyer's books, so I can answer question about the books: that does not mean that I am a rabid fan.
And, it's impossible for me to "lash-out" when I haven't even "lashed-out" up to the point in my post that you quoted.
Indeed, I ignored the name dropping, didn't even read your entire post, and went straight for the paraphrase. But, of course, you, having a poor memory, did not see the reference, at all.
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
I most certainly never said Riddick was shot, Riddick used the Necro to block the direct force of the shot, he was hit by the concussion.Douche. Don't be one.
Oh really?
You do remember me rubbing it in your face, on the phone, when I showed you were Riddick did NOT take a direct hit by one of those blasts, right? Remember you had me believing that he took a direct blast whereas others, including the obviously "more-durable-than-humans" necromongers were getting their flesh destroyed by the energy guns? Then, after finding a clip, I called your bullshit and showed you that Riddick grabbed a body to stop the blast? Of course you don't remember that because it isn't convenient to your argument. Even if you did remember that, you wouldn't admit it.
Luckily, I have proof that you were using that line of reasoning, in a thread, until I "confronted" you about that feat, off KMC:
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
I was talking about the end battle up until Faako shooting him, you know that, dont be stupid, it doesnt look good on you.
This post can be found, here:
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=518736&pagenumber=4
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Riddick killed 40ish guys with multiple knives, with the energy gun, with his hands. There were three where he was swinging Kyra around, if you want to discount those 3, fine, 37ish.
There are several that he doesn't even kill, and you're counting those. He just knocks them around or throws them.
How many did he ACTUALLY kill (relative to the movie, of course)?
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Example two?This little exchange:
I said:
You said:
I replied with this:
Your reply? Sheer arrogance:
My reply to that? Epic pwnage. Ass rape:
Result?
Well.......What say you now? Hmm? Hmm? Hmmmmmmmmmmmm?
I haven't had a chance to reply to that, yet, as you have waaaaay more free time than I do.
Why didn't you post the rest of what Carlisle said in that same paragraph? Oh, I know, it puts things into perspective and it shows that you are taking things out of context.
Fact: Carlisle's father was part of the Clergy.
Fact: Most Christians believe that we all fall short of the glory. We are all damned unless we confess, believe, and live that Christ is the Savior and through him is eternal salvation, bla bla bla.
Fact: Shortly after Carlisle saying, "By all accounts, we're damned regardless. But I hope, maybe foolishly, that we'll get some measure of credit for trying."
Fact: Carlisle goes on to say that there's no way someone as good as Edward cannot have a form of heaven. Here it is:
"Edward's with me up to a point. God and heaven exist...and so does hell. But he doesn't believe there is an afterlife for our kind." Carlisle's voice was very soft; he stared out the big window over the sink, into the darkness."You see, he thinks we've lost our souls."
I immediately thought of Edward's words this afternoon: unless you want to die-or whatever it is that we do. The lightbulb flicked on over my head.
Carlisle spoke slowly. "I look at my...son. His strength, his goodness, the brightness that shines out of him-and it only fuels that hope, that faith, more than ever. How could there not be more for one such as Edward?"
I nodded in fervent agreement.
"But if I believed as he does..." He looked down at me with unfathomable eyes. "If you belied as he did. Could you take away his soul?
So, wait a minute, what was Carlisle talking about?
"By all ACCOUNTS, we're damned regardless." (emphasis added)
Is it possible that you had a minor reading comprehension problem? Is it possible that you did not understand that Carlisle was referring to the common human opinion of vampires' after-life fate, rather than his own personal belief? Oh, wait, he was. If you had read the book, you would know that his father was a vampire hunter and preached that Vampires were damned creatures, bla bla bla. Conversation is far more in context when you have the information before and after that statement.
Carlisle says, "If I believed as he does..." and that's it. The end. Lights out. You're wrong.
Nice try, wiggle boy, but you've only proven my point, further.
Carlisle believes in heaven for vampires that do good and make a real effort to be good: Edward does not. That's the end of that discussion.
You've been, I'll use the old school term, owned so horribly on this point, it's beyond absurd. You've been caught editing out portions of what you quoted, just to be right. I don't know why, but you thought that I actually would not notice? You thought that, somehow, my memory would fail me and I wouldn't remember any of the conversation that took place before and after the piece you quoted?
You really should apologize for trying to be the deceitful. That was quite dishonest.
Regardless, enough of the original context is in the quote, anyway, to prove yourself wrong.
Edit - talking about his has reminded me that I need to pwn your ass in that Riddick vs. Preston thread. I still haven't replied to your last long ass post from back in October.
I've got to post a reply to inimalist on a fitness post I made, via youtube, I've got to reply to inimalist on a global warming post. I've got to rely to inimalist on a phantom pain post, I've got to reply to Asnter on a rectangular cuboid post. I've got to explain to Bardock what fulfilling the law means. And, finally, I've got to make a youtube vid and post it of Kramer's anger. These are all the things that I need to do, said I would do, and have not forgotten about.
BTW, you're still my boy and I think you're good people, John. Remember, blue in the face. This shit stays in the threads, but not when we do real life stuff. Aight?
Originally posted by dadudemon
Actually, it's the exact opposite. You know this as fact. But, instead, you pretend it's not true because your ego was hurt when I called our your b.s. 40 number...a number that was already called into question in another thread over a year ago.If you actually had a good enough memory, you would have recognized that argument and dropped it.
But, keep in mind, I'm the one with a bad memory. 😐
I gotcha, "No, you!!!" right? 🙄
I'm glad you decided to go down this path.Wow, are you serious?Are you prepared for this humaliation:
Example:
Laugh it up fuzzball.
You said it was furball.
It was not.
It occurred near the top of a page in a thread, in the OTF, around 2 years ago, and it included, just a bout, a three way conversation between you, Billie, and I.
Han Solo, one of your favorite characters, giving a memorable quote, and you got it wrong and I got it right. How many times have I seen ESB? Twice. How many times have you seen it? I have nooooo idea....but it is definitely more than a dozen times.
Another example: I had to almost beat it into your head clip in the Big Lewbowski, I was referring to, when I said the "fat-man skip." You had no clue what I was talking about and I had to replay the scene, verbally, several times until you finally "remembered." You didn't actually remember, though, you just said you did, watched the movie later on that week, and when we spoke of the movie again, your remembrance of the scene improved greatly.So, because I appreciate the entire film, and forgot how John Goodman WALKED for half a second, your memory is better than mine? Get a grip, dude.The second time we spoke about that film, which is after you had watched it again, you misquoted back the scene Walter is beating the shit out of the Vette. You said, "watch what happens, Larry, when you **** a stranger in the ass." I corrected you, and you quickly played it off.
How many times had you watched The Big Lewbowski at the point? A dozen?
There are dozens of situations and scenarios from the Star Wars Prequel Trilogy of numerous occasions I had to remind you of conversations and events that occurred.Complete and utter bullshit. Quit making shit up to make yourself look better.
To actually answer your question, I didn't even read your entire post. You see, I am so arrogant that I know what someone is going to say without having to read their entire post. It works 99/100 times. I didn't even bother reading beyond the first few words as it was a waste of time (it really was, because the only thing off was a gender reference that I would have picked up on had I read your entire post). I could have sworn it was going to be more Akasha nut swinging, so I referenced a text message conversation that you and I had so you would stop with the BS. Forgive me for not giving a shit about your character name drops because I was being arrogant again? Also, you can call b.s. on what I just told you, but I've already said that I do that on KMC no less than twice, already.Dodgeball!!!!
Also, if by bragging about reading Rice's books, you mean this:John:
"Dude you are a twif*g. Dont deny it."Dom:
...
"I read all four books."
You know full well I am kidding with that shit. Stop acting like I stole your lunch money.
John:TwiTwink. Gay vampire lover.
"Aaaahahahahaaa youre a twif*g!"
See?
Dom:
"I also read Anne Rice's books: does that make me a Rice f*g?"
You called Khayman a "she", TWICE. That wasn't a mistake, that was you not knowing what the hell you are talking about. Stop playing dodgeball, you're caught.
"I also read the bible, multiple times: does that make me a Jesus f*g?"Wow, epic butthurt is epic. I need a grain of salt.John:
"Nah because jesus is epic pwnage. He is the man. Twilight is epic gayness. Anne rices vamps are better in every way.Dom:
"You won't ever hear [me] talking about how good of a writer Stephanie Meyer is, but you will hear m state that Anne Rice is one of my favorite authors. That doesn't change the fact that I remember lots of shit and can answer questions about something I read."
It would seem you either:I remember fine, you just can't admit when you're wrong. I thought AC's ego was big, you got him beat by miles, hun.a) Did not remember our conversation.
or
b) Did not understand the context.
Let me put it in simpler words for you:If having read the books makes me a Twif*g, despite my thoughts on Stephanie Meyer as a writer, then I'm an even bigger Rice f*g because I actually enjoyed her writing style, far more than Meyer's. I read Meyer's books, so I can answer question about the books: that does not mean that I am a rabid fan.
[/quote[Khayman is not a she. Khayman is not a she.
See what I did there? I said it TWICE.
[quote]And, it's impossible for me to "lash-out" when I haven't even "lashed-out" up to the point in my post that you quoted.
Indeed, I ignored the name dropping, didn't even read your entire post, and went straight for the paraphrase. But, of course, you, having a poor memory, did not see the reference, at all.
No you!!!! Did I get that right?
Oh really?You do remember me rubbing it in your face, on the phone, when I showed you were Riddick did NOT take a direct hit by one of those blasts, right? Remember you had me believing that he took a direct blast whereas others, including the obviously "more-durable-than-humans" necromongers were getting their flesh destroyed by the energy guns? Then, after finding a clip, I called your bullshit and showed you that Riddick grabbed a body to stop the blast? Of course you don't remember that because it isn't convenient to your argument. Even if you did remember that, you wouldn't admit it.
Luckily, I have proof that you were using that line of reasoning, in a thread, until I "confronted" you about that feat, off KMC:
This post can be found, here:
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=518736&pagenumber=4
There are several that he doesn't even kill, and you're counting those. He just knocks them around or throws them.
How many did he ACTUALLY kill (relative to the movie, of course)?
He did shoot him. He shot both of them. Riddick was not hit full force by the energy blast, he was hit by the concussive wave. That's what I meant, I explained it to you thoroughly. Guess you forgot that, didncha?
Originally posted by dadudemonNot for much longer, I got word today.
I haven't had a chance to reply to that, yet, as you have waaaaay more free time than I do.
Why didn't you post the rest of what Carlisle said in that same paragraph? Oh, I know, it puts things into perspective and it shows that you are taking things out of context.Because it doesn't matter. You claimed he didn't say it. I proved it. You're wrong, I'm right. End of story.
Fact: Carlisle's father was part of the Clergy.Neat.
Fact: Most Christians believe that we all fall short of the glory. We are all damned unless we confess, believe, and live that Christ is the Savior and through him is eternal salvation, bla bla bla.
Fact: Shortly after Carlisle saying, "By all accounts, we're damned regardless. But I hope, maybe foolishly, that we'll get some measure of credit for trying."
Fact: Carlisle goes on to say that there's no way someone as good as Edward cannot have a form of heaven. Here it is:So, wait a minute, what was Carlisle talking about?
"By all ACCOUNTS, we're damned regardless." (emphasis added)
Is it possible that you had a minor reading comprehension problem? Is it possible that you did not understand that Carlisle was referring to the common human opinion of vampires' after-life fate, rather than his own personal belief? Oh, wait, he was. If you had read the book, you would know that his father was a vampire hunter and preached that Vampires were damned creatures, bla bla bla. Conversation is far more in context when you have the information before and after that statement.
Carlisle says, "If I believed as he does..." and that's it. The end. Lights out. You're wrong.
Nice try, wiggle boy, but you've only proven my point, further.
Wriggle boy, now THAT'S funny.
Carlisle believes in heaven for vampires that do good and make a real effort to be good: Edward does not. That's the end of that discussion.Carslile is wrong, dude. Vampires are dead, dead things have no souls. Next question.
You've been, I'll use the old school term, owned so horribly on this point, it's beyond absurd. You've been caught editing out portions of what you quoted, just to be right.Aaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahaaa look at you, were you touching yourself as you typed that?
I don't know why, but you thought that I actually would not notice? You thought that, somehow, my memory would fail me and I wouldn't remember any of the conversation that took place before and after the piece you quoted?
You really should apologize for trying to be the deceitful. That was quite dishonest.Regardless, enough of the original context is in the quote, anyway, to prove yourself wrong.
Everyone paying attention? This is DDM's usual last line of defense. Finger pointing and shifting of blame, false accusations. And he's GOOD at it.
Edit - talking about his has reminded me that I need to pwn your ass in that Riddick vs. Preston thread. I still haven't replied to your last long ass post from back in October.Pwned me how? You pwned shit, that thread is WAY over.
I've got to post a reply to inimalist on a fitness post I made, via youtube, I've got to reply to inimalist on a global warming post. I've got to rely to inimalist on a phantom pain post, I've got to reply to Asnter on a rectangular cuboid post. I've got to explain to Bardock what fulfilling the law means. And, finally, I've got to make a youtube vid and post it of Kramer's anger. These are all the things that I need to do, said I would do, and have not forgotten about.Then go do them, *****.
BTW, you're still my boy and I think you're good people, John. Remember, blue in the face. This shit stays in the threads, but not when we do real life stuff. Aight?
You think I forgot that?
Now go fap to Ed Cullen, twifag.