Originally posted by Nihilist
Galactus wins, all this % talk is pointless imho as we never really know what Galactus's limits are when at these power lvls.
Yeah, actually I agree since you won't see % in the comics. I was just bored.
G's power seems to increase geometrically anyway since his high end feats are orders of magnitude greater than what he does in more hungry states. He should destroy Thanos, end of story.
The Thanos and galactus tussle was more akin to Me fighting a baby but then I find out the baby has a strength of a 5 yr old but shock does not equal "he will give me a fight if I was weaker" it's more like shock = "Wow that baby it stronger than I thought I better use two fingers to kill it rather then just my pinky toe"
Originally posted by Lord Feron
The Thanos and galactus tussle was more akin to Me fighting a baby but then I find out the baby has a strength of a 5 yr old but shock does not equal "he will give me a fight if I was weaker" it's more like shock = "Wow that baby it stronger than I thought I better use two fingers to kill it rather then just my pinky toe"
lol this is basically the truth
Originally posted by Lord Feronquoted for truth!
The Thanos and galactus tussle was more akin to Me fighting a baby but then I find out the baby has a strength of a 5 yr old but shock does not equal "he will give me a fight if I was weaker" it's more like shock = "Wow that baby it stronger than I thought I better use two fingers to kill it rather then just my pinky toe"
Originally posted by Power Cosmic IIA well fed Galactus failed to kill him shooting directly on top of him yet you bring that weak blast which killed who again? The point is even a well fed Galactus depleted vital energies and Thor himself ran off Galactus while weakened so please try to use some rationale thought based on their showings not a biased answer because you like Galactus more.
Dodge? I already stated that Thanos is no threat to him. What is there to dodge?And no he cannot beat 30%. Annihilation Galactus was less than 30%. If we're going to play situational circumstances then Galactus can just ring off the same 3+ star system omni-directional blast, except this time just concentrating it all on thanos.
finished. no threat.
Originally posted by Lord_TalronI am simply going over the facts here.
when you interpret showings of thanos in the direct opposite way that every other single person on this forum does....
Originally posted by basiliskWell fed to me means around 80-90 percent full. Thanos showed sufficient power to throttle him and 50 percent lower Thanos beats him. Thanos, 10/10 in all scenarios. Thor can chase him off scared when he's really weakened so Thanos is annihilating him.
Thanos described his might as 'lilliputian' compared to Galactus. The Lilliputians were about 6 inches tall. So they were considered about 1/12 scale compared to a 6 foot tall man, or about 8.333%. Even taking Thanos' remark literally and not figuratively it still means that Galactus wins at 90%, 50%, 30% or 10% of full power.Taking it further, Thanos made that remark about a Galactus who was not even at full power. Allowing for Galactus being at a middle range estimate of 50% at the time then Thanos actually comes in at less than 4.2% of a full power Galactus, and therefore loses even to a Galactus at only 5% of full power.
Therefore Thanos loses in all scenarios.
Originally posted by quanchi112Failed to kill him? Thanos begged Galactus not to kill him and Galactus relented. And please confirm you're not suggesting that the Galactus Event was somehow weaker than the handblast he exerted on Thanos...
A well fed Galactus failed to kill him shooting directly on top of him yet you bring that weak blast which killed who again? The point is even a well fed Galactus depleted vital energies and Thor himself ran off Galactus while weakened so please try to use some rationale thought based on their showings not a biased answer because you like Galactus more.
Originally posted by quanchi112Try remembering the fact that Thanos admits he's done nothing but piss Galactus off with that shot. Try remembering the fact that Thanos also admitted his power is miniscule compared to Galactus'.
I am simply going over the facts here.
Originally posted by quanchi112Just because Galactus was surprised by how much he had to exert himself to destroy Thanos' personal shields doesn't mean he's never exerted more power than that before. Galactus takes on In-Betweener, Mephisto in his own realm, Ego, Tenebrous & Aegis. Thanos is a mite in comparison.
Well fed to me means around 80-90 percent full. Thanos showed sufficient power to throttle him and 50 percent lower Thanos beats him. Thanos, 10/10 in all scenarios. Thor can chase him off scared when he's really weakened so Thanos is annihilating him.
He'd drive off a completely famished Galactus and that's about it.
Originally posted by quanchi112
A well fed Galactus failed to kill him shooting directly on top of him yet you bring that weak blast which killed who again? The point is even a well fed Galactus depleted vital energies and Thor himself ran off Galactus while weakened so please try to use some rationale thought based on their showings not a biased answer because you like Galactus more.
Thanos begged Galactus not to kill him. You have no rebuttal.
A blast that vaporized a watcher and ran through 3+ star systems. Until you prove that Thanos tanks star system (which contains 2 solar systems) blasts, you have no rebuttal.
Thor ran off Galactus IN THE SILVER AGE. When the most powerful foe Galactus stated he had ever faced was Ego the Living Planet. This is current Galactus. Pay attention to the rules about current characters being used by default...you're getting a free pass here on Silver Age. Since you use that to ground your "rationale."
I am simply going over the facts here.That was a bunch of text and subjective content. You still have to post facts.
Well fed to me means around 80-90 percent full. Thanos showed sufficient power to throttle him and 50 percent lower Thanos beats him. Thanos, 10/10 in all scenarios. Thor can chase him off scared when he's really weakened so Thanos is annihilating him.
Thanos has never beaten anyone anywhere near Galactus' level with his own power. Grasping for optimisitic conditions with no evidence just reiterates a non-argument. Thanos showed sufficient power to make Galactus angry. Where in the entire encounter was Galactus in any danger at all? When? You mean when Thanos admitted his blast did nothing at all? I think Thanos was talking specifically to you. He foreshadowed your false statements and gave you his own words to save you the trouble. **Yawn** at bringing up a silver aged feat against a Galactus that is clearly weaker than his modern (i.e., in the past 15 years) incarnation.
Originally posted by OneDumbG0
Failed to kill him? Thanos begged Galactus not to kill him and Galactus relented. And please confirm you're not suggesting that the Galactus Event was somehow weaker than the handblast he exerted on Thanos... Try remembering the fact that Thanos admits he's done nothing but piss Galactus off with that shot. Try remembering the fact that Thanos also admitted his power is miniscule compared to Galactus'. Just because Galactus was surprised by how much he had to exert himself to destroy Thanos' personal shields doesn't mean he's never exerted more power than that before. Galactus takes on In-Betweener, Mephisto in his own realm, Ego, Tenebrous & Aegis. Thanos is a mite in comparison.He'd drive off a completely famished Galactus and that's about it.
I should have read your post before posting. It would have saved me the trouble of a response.
Originally posted by basiliskNice logic.I appluade but I don't think thats quite how it would work
Thanos described his might as 'lilliputian' compared to Galactus. The Lilliputians were about 6 inches tall. So they were considered about 1/12 scale compared to a 6 foot tall man, or about 8.333%. Even taking Thanos' remark literally and not figuratively it still means that Galactus wins at 90%, 50%, 30% or 10% of full power.Taking it further, Thanos made that remark about a Galactus who was not even at full power. Allowing for Galactus being at a middle range estimate of 50% at the time then Thanos actually comes in at less than 4.2% of a full power Galactus, and therefore loses even to a Galactus at only 5% of full power.
Therefore Thanos loses in all scenarios.
Originally posted by quanchi112😂
A well fed Galactus failed to kill him shooting directly on top of him yet you bring that weak blast which killed who again? The point is even a well fed Galactus depleted vital energies and Thor himself ran off Galactus while weakened so please try to use some rationale thought based on their showings not a biased answer because you like Galactus more.
I am simply going over the facts here.Well fed to me means around 80-90 percent full. Thanos showed sufficient power to throttle him and 50 percent lower Thanos beats him. Thanos, 10/10 in all scenarios. Thor can chase him off scared when he's really weakened so Thanos is annihilating him.
😐
Throttle him?You mean blast him back which thanos said did nothing then at the end of the fight beg for his life...
Personally I think thanos can take the 5% and mabye 10 but not any higher
Originally posted by King CastleMore or less how I feel.
if galactus is smart he could beat thanos but i dont know the power consumption of his attacks..at 5% i'll give it to thanos..
at 10% thanos is going to have to hit and run to deplete galactus power.. not sure 50/50
20% thanos gets easily smoked
Originally posted by King Kandy
No... just because he was < a well fed galactus doesn't mean that he can't beat a Galactus that is 20 times weaker.