Blade vs. Selene

Started by byrdgang213 pages

Blade vs. Selene

This is Blade vs Selene as she was at the end of Underworld Evolution so she has her amped powers from drinking Corvinus' Blood.

They Both have there standard weapons. Fight takes place NYC rooftops.

Who wins?

i'll pick selene.

I'd say Selene cause she drank the Elderest (lol) of all the immortal's blood.

I think Blade has the Better hand to hand skills tho

Standard gear means both of their weapons are irrelevant because Blade shrugs off bullets and his weapons are made of silver... Underworld vamps are effected by the sun, not silver. That said, i think Selene would overpower him via strength and speed.

Selene pays her taxes.. she wins lol

Originally posted by marwash22
Standard gear means both of their weapons are irrelevant because Blade shrugs off bullets and his weapons are made of silver... Underworld vamps are effected by the sun, not silver. That said, i think Selene would overpower him via strength and speed.

Blade could do damage with his sword still. That would be his best chance because I agree that Selene probably has the edge in raw speed and power.

Originally posted by marwash22
Standard gear means both of their weapons are irrelevant because Blade shrugs off bullets and his weapons are made of silver... Underworld vamps are effected by the sun, not silver. That said, i think Selene would overpower him via strength and speed.

Selene is not affected by the Sun either after drinking old pa's blood.

Also I don't remember Blade shrugging off bullets, but it has been a long time since I've watched the films.

I'd say Selene takes this.

Mmm................I say Selene.

Originally posted by Placidity
Also I don't remember Blade shrugging off bullets, but it has been a long time since I've watched the films.
He tanked like 6 bullets in the back in the first sequence of 'Blade'. It's in part due to his armor, but that's still apart of his standard gear so I'd say its valid. He also got impaled multiple times in 'Blade' and 'Blade 2' and did nothing more than wince for moment.

But yeah, physical stats are the difference makers in this match.

Placidity is right, he doesn't shrug off bullets, his armor takes them.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Placidity is right, he doesn't shrug off bullets, his armor takes them.
So, we're playing the semantics game? If you shoot me in the back and it doesn't effect me at all, whether I'm wearing a vest or not... I still "shrugged it off"

I never once said, "Blade is bulletproof".

That's not tanking bullets, taking them in the armor, that's his armor tanking them. Nomak, he tanked bullets. ALOT of them.

Yeah not really.

Originally posted by marwash22

I'm all for this type of stuff is someone is douching up the forums. It just doesn't apply in this case.

RJ was replying on topic and being serious.

Serious or not, replying to post with semantics being the basis of your rebuttal and creating a debate where there doesn't need to be one, is trolling, or bating... you pick.

No it's not, it's me having a different definition of "tanking bullets."

Let's let the public decide. Hey, Public, what is "tanking bullets?"

A: Having them bounce off your armor.

B. Like Nomak, absorbing them and shrugging them off?

Duh, it's B.

Nomak tanked bullets. Zombies tank bullets unless it's the head. Big Daddy did not tank bullets: his body armor did.

It's rather simple.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Duh, it's B.

Nomak tanked bullets. Zombies tank bullets unless it's the head. Big Daddy did not tank bullets: his body armor did.

It's rather simple.

now if others can get it