Originally posted by majid86
Nope.
I love women but it would be asking too much of them to risk their lives on the battlefield and i DONT hate white people.I maybe be Brown but i'll always be human first.
It may be wrong to ask anyone to risk their life. But what if a woman wants to fight on the battlefield?
Originally posted by King Castle
the marines were never designed to be anything other then combat... with the introduction of various admin jobs and rear mechanic jobs.. it open the door for women to be allowed in due to the none combat mos's.these jobs were always there but were small and the main job of a marine is "combat". although we have always bn reinforced with this is less true each day with certain mos's..
plus the large majority of women that do make it into the fleet after passing the lowered physical exams then the men come in broken..
which is a large problem both to the women and the corps.. there are a large number of women that never go overseas due to medical reasons... from purposely getting pregnant months prior to shipping or simply not being admin sep due of fear of being accused of anything.. hell some never redo their obligated PFT every few months and run with their boot camp ones and get promoted.. any man that tried that would be kicked out the corp but women seem to get the exception BS...
http://www.eorthopod.com/content/injuries-among-female-marine-corps-recruits
as such a high number like these something should have bn done but ppl are afraid of being accused of sexism..if a female marine can do the same exact physical training and pft as men then keep them in.. but until the law changes they shouldnt have a combat mos and hopefully the marines will phase out non combat mos which would deny women the ability to enlist in the marines.
Well, I am all for equal standards for jobs.
Originally posted by Robtard
Way back in the day, I had a 11th level Chaotic Good Human Cleric that could do that.
Since when are Clerics ever chaotic good? You suck at DnD.
edit-
I don't really see the point in barring women from combat roles as long as their willing and focused. They'd probably be better, at the very least, be better at staying focused on the task at hand compared to guys, physical inferiority be damned. Besides it's not like we're fighting in trenches and the average foot soldier needs to be at the peak of physical health.
http://therealrevo.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/fat-soldier-thumb-450x401.jpg
http://www.cslacker.com/images/file/mediums/fat_soldier.jpg
Welcome to Modern Warfare. Who needs Arnold Schwarzenegger-esque soldiers when we can vaporize cities with the push of a button?
Originally posted by RE: Blaxicanis that why we are still fighting in the streets of iraq and Afghanistan?I don't really see the point in barring women from combat roles as long as their willing and focused. They'd probably be better, at the very least, be better at staying focused on the task at hand compared to guys, physical inferiority be damned. Besides it's not like we're fighting in trenches and the average foot soldier needs to be at the peak of physical health.
http://therealrevo.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/fat-soldier-thumb-450x401.jpg
http://www.cslacker.com/images/file/mediums/fat_soldier.jpg
Welcome to Modern Warfare. Who needs Arnold Schwarzenegger-esque soldiers when we can vaporize cities with the push of a button?
either way imagine the moral of a country if they get taken down by an army of fat bodies and women..
Originally posted by King Castle
no, i mean stopping a convoy b/c she needs to go pee... or men fighting over her and women charging men for sex out in the field.. or them sleeping with their command which is always a problem..
This maybe the most funniest post i've read since joining KMC forums!
Thumbs Up for that man, you rock!
