Lady Shiva Vs Daredevil

Started by Martian_mind5 pages

Shiva.

I mean, we talk about muscle and strength and all, but it's so not a deciding factor at this level.

Connor Hawke's got 30-40lbs on Shiva, is capable of going toe-to-toe with Richard Dragon, and Shiva beat the snot out of him.

Heck, Shiva deals out so much damage, it'd be easy to accuse her of chi-amping. One of the few DC types to do chi stuff on occasion, after all, and all that force behind the leopard blow has to come from somewhere.

Id say out of all the non-enhanced MA's in DCU, Shiva defo has one of the best chances of taking DD. But not for a majority. In pure H2H, he is the TOP non physically enhanced fighter in both universes imo. As strong physically as Batman, fast as Casandra Cain, intimate knowledge of pressure points , is the most agile, add radar and senses, i think he edges Shiva 7-8/10.

Originally posted by Q99

She's faster, more skilled, and still strong enough to punch through bones. What's a little more muscle compared to that?

Batman > DD but you do talk out of your arse alot and make blantant assumptions. facepalm

Yeah Shiva's faster than DD because I like DC street levelers more.

Originally posted by PhilosophÃ_a
You better be careful there. It's one thing to continuously wank Marvel -- very few actually care about that, as you could see for a while now -- and it's another to make posts like this.

It's not a method to get attention when your fanboysh posts don't, it's one to get banned.

You are a DC version of srank anyway.

Shiva.

Daredevel ftw

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
Shiva.

Shiva

Shiva beating Connor is a good feat. But its her overall record.

Shiva has lost to Batgirl twice, Batman, Richard and got owned by Prom.

Those are really some terrible fighters she has lost to.

Originally posted by Deadline
You are a DC version of srank anyway.
😆

Originally posted by King Castle
slade? were they Ma'ers or a stupid meta similar to guys like Absorbing man or grundy?

She probably could give Slade problems...

But she did kill Cassandra Cain once, and gave her all she could handle in the rematch, and I'd give Cass decent odds against DD.

Originally posted by Q99

Heck, Shiva deals out so much damage, it'd be easy to accuse her of chi-amping. One of the few DC types to do chi stuff on occasion, after all, and all that force behind the leopard blow has to come from somewhere.

She did resurrect Cass with a chi technique, so she's not a stranger to chi.

Originally posted by Deadline
Batman > DD but you do talk out of your arse alot and make blantant assumptions. facepalm

Yeah Shiva's faster than DD because I like DC street levelers more.

You are a DC version of srank anyway.


DC doesn't have an Srank but Marvel has like ten of them. You're one of them.

Marvel Streetlevel fanboys seem to be on the warpath recently. Perhaps its some response to Battlehammer getting banned.

BH got banned?

Originally posted by Omega Vision
DC doesn't have an Srank but Marvel has like ten of them. You're one of them.

Marvel Streetlevel fanboys seem to be on the warpath recently. Perhaps its some response to Battlehammer getting banned.

I see im a marvel fanbiy eventhough I stated that Batman was superior to Daredevil and I also stated that srank was incorrect that Marvel martial arts are superior to DC?

Got it. 👆

Originally posted by Deadline
I see im a marvel fanbiy eventhough I stated that Batman was superior to Daredevil and I also stated that srank was incorrect that Marvel martial arts are superior to DC?

Got it. 👆


I didn't say you were as bad as Srank, just that with certain characters *cough*Punisher*cough* you can have Srank like bias.

You're a Marvel fanboy because you clearly prefer Marvel characters over DC characters just as I'm a DC fanboy for the opposite reason.

Originally posted by Deadline
I see im a marvel fanbiy eventhough I stated that Batman was superior to Daredevil and I also stated that srank was incorrect that Marvel martial arts are superior to DC?

Got it. 👆

👆

Originally posted by Omega Vision
I didn't say you were as bad as Srank, just that with certain characters *cough*Punisher*cough* you can have Srank like bias.

What you mean the fact that I think Punisher could take Az without flaming swords based on the fact Huntress was stalemating him? Or the fact that you think its bullshit that Punisher can do well against DD despite the fact hes actually done this?

Originally posted by Omega Vision

You're a Marvel fanboy because you clearly prefer Marvel characters over DC characters just as I'm a DC fanboy for the opposite reason.

Yes I know stating that DS has superior HF to Steve Rogers and stating that DC martial arts are not superior to Marvel clearly indicates this.

You done talking crap now?

Originally posted by Deadline
What you mean the fact that I think Punisher could take Az without flaming swords based on the fact Huntress was stalemating him? Or the fact that you think its bullshit that Punisher can do well against DD despite the fact hes actually done this?

Yes I know stating that DS has superior HF to Steve Rogers and stating that DC martial arts are not superior to Marvel clearly indicates this.

You done talking crap now?


Yes because using a low showing to underrate a character is totally not fanboyish material...oh wait. Azrael beat Bane and took on DS in a sword fight, ergo him getting stalemated by Huntress shouldn't be considered an average estimate of his power/skill.

Recognizing that DS has superior HF to Cap and not arbitrarily placing Marvel MA above DC MA isn't a sign that you're not Marvel biased, it just means you aren't a complete idiot.

Are you going to tell me you're not Marvel biased?