Street Fighter X Tekken

Originally posted by Nephthys
Angry Joe works for Blistered Thumbs and likely is given assignments on which game he's going to buy and review rather than picking them himself. I don't know what you have against him, but you should probably stop talking because you're kind of making yourself look silly.

Originally posted by No End N Site
Just so ya'know, all the DLC MK9 characters were on disc, save for Freddy. So were the fatalities and a bunch of other shit.

Only Skarlet was on the disc but she clearly wasn't complete. Also, weren't the Fatalities unlockable?

I think Joe's problem is, he's popular, thus a default face for his base. And he's not leading by example. He's not telling his audience to tell Capcom to take a hike and stop buying the games.

And FYI, what Joe did with SFxT wasn't a "review", it was rant.

Originally posted by Bro SMASH
Only Skarlet was on the disc but she clearly wasn't complete. Also, weren't the Fatalities unlockable?

None of the characters on SFxT's disc are complete, except MM and PM, and they are free DLC. Some fatalities are unlockable, some were DLC, all of which were on disc. MK9 also had alternate DLC costumes that were on disc DLC.

Originally posted by Ridley_Prime

What makes you think we or I believe that disc locked DLC is only a Capcom thing? It's the biggest sin of this generation no matter who does it, though Capcom is one of the first and most obvious companies to do it, which I guess is why they get the finger pointed at them the most when it comes to it. The DLC of those other games have been complained about too though, as pointed out.

Whether a DLC is disc locked or not, I don't mind it personally if it prolongs the life of a game awhile after it's been out and provides a worthwhile experience, but if they have DLC on day 1 of a game's release like with SFxT here or ME3, then that's usually where I draw the line.

And the thing with Capcom having YouTube accounts and Facebook comments deleted and using that "architectural difference" excuse to not have cooperative tagteams on the 360 version of SFxT (when they have that on both versions of Mortal Kombat) speaks for itself...

No one seems to complain about the DLC until Capcom does it, this just doesn't apply to KMC, it's this terrible everywhere.

I personally don't care either about this DLC nonsense. I just find it annoying that people will complain, but have logged over 1000hrs in games they claim to hate.

Yeah, that much is pure BS and it should be illegal to do such things. They're stomping all over the 1st Amendment. I'm just glad I'm not cuaght up in the shit storm, since I had no intent of ever purchasing this game, from the very outset.

Originally posted by No End N Site
If he doesn't even review, even a small percentage of well known fightin games, why would he take the time to review a game he hates?

YouTube video

YouTube video

YouTube video

YouTube video

I could've just made the list simple by saying the names of the games he reviewed but then you probably would've asked me for evidence seeing as how you can't seem to do it yourself even when searching for these kind of things are easy.

Dude's prolly playin SFxT, right now and havin the time of his life.

Well he did admit the game is good so I'm pretty sure he's enjoying it but you seem to be missing the point of what he's talking about. Content on disc locked, no online tagteams...is any of this ringing any bells?

The kid doesn't have to review anything.

Congratulations, you discovered that people can have a choice. Well he wants to review and that's what he's doing. So...

^lol maybe he wanted to do a review he knew would actually get views...

@Nemesis X

Your post missed the enitire point of what's being talked about. You don't rage against a company that you feel gypt by, and then turn around and cotinue to purchase their products.

It's really that simple and that's what he's doing, and it's a problem for those who tune in to him.

Like stated before, you can't complain about a game, then support it to the point of a top 3 seller and expect things to change. The outrage is not corellating with the profit returns. If you are really serious about change, you have to make it happen. They're a buisness, when their pockets hurt, they will change.

-edit-
Is that all the reviews you can find? None of which you have posted are actually the games asked about in the post.

You guys are ****ing stupid.

Originally posted by Frisky Dingo
None of the characters on SFxT's disc are complete, except MM and PM, and they are free DLC. Some fatalities are unlockable, some were DLC, all of which were on disc. MK9 also had alternate DLC costumes that were on disc DLC.

From what I heard, the characters in SFxT were complete. They looked more complete compared to Skarlet. Also, DLC costumes aren't really as bad as DLC characters (at least to me it's not, but I'm sure I'm not the only one).

Originally posted by Bro SMASH
From what I heard, the characters in SFxT were complete. They looked more complete compared to Skarlet. Also, DLC costumes aren't really as bad as DLC characters (at least to me it's not, but I'm sure I'm not the only one).

Well.........they are not. They have very patchy voice and sound work. Some of the characters have missing moves and they also have lots of bugs and glitches that make the game freeze. There're vids on youtube, I'll see if they all haven't been taken down yet. How that compares to Skarlet? Well, LOL that's "your" opinion. It really shouldn't matter, if the content isn't complete and stable, it simply isn't complete and stable.

Originally posted by Frisky Dingo
@Nemesis X

Your post missed the enitire point of what's being talked about. You don't rage against a company that you feel gypt by, and then turn around and cotinue to purchase their products.

It's really that simple and that's what he's doing, and it's a problem for those who tune in to him.

Like stated before, you can't complain about a game, then support it to the point of a top 3 seller and expect things to change. The outrage is not corellating with the profit returns. If you are really serious about change, you have to make it happen. They're a buisness, when their pockets hurt, they will change.

-edit-
Is that all the reviews you can find? None of which you have posted are actually the games asked about in the post.

Joe has to buy them so he can review them! That's what a reviewer does.

Exactly what's wrong about tuning in to him? I'm lost here.

You're telling me this like I bought it which I didn't.

Apparently I forgot to post this review also:
YouTube video

Anyways, you're missing the point. No End says the dude hasn't reviewed a small percentage of well known fighting games and I call bullcrap on that. The videos prove how wrong he is. KoF, MK, SC, FF, and MvC are well known so bite me.

Originally posted by Frisky Dingo
Well.........they are not. They lack voices and a lot of sound work. They also have lots of bugs and glitches that make the game freeze. There're vids on youtube, I'll see if they all haven't been taken down yet. How that compares to Skarlet?

None of that happened in the videos I have seen already. Maybe some newer ones got posted but in the ones I saw, the game didn't freeze or have any sound problems (except for in the Character Select screen).

Though on the contrary, that's what I saw with Skarlet (though it more lagged than "freeze"😉.

Originally posted by Frisky Dingo
Well, LOL that's "your" opinion.

Yeah, about the costumes.

Originally posted by Bro SMASH
None of that happened in the videos I have seen already. Maybe some newer ones got posted but in the ones I saw, the game didn't freeze or have any sound problems (except for in the Character Select screen).

Though on the contrary, that's what I saw with Skarlet (though it more lagged than "freeze"😉.

Yeah, about the costumes.

Well then clearly we aren't seeing the same videos.......In the vids I seen, Alisa was the only character with supers and cross-whatever-attacks. That's not complete enough to be a viable charater.

Okay....

Frisky Dingo is a brave man, to criticise Mortal Kombat in an argument with Smashbro.

Originally posted by NemeBro
Frisky Dingo is a brave man, to criticise Mortal Kombat in an argument with Smashbro.

I'm not criticizing MK9. I'm just pointing out some similarities. Every fighter has on disc locked DLC nowadays, even Blazblue and KOFXIII.

Originally posted by Nemesis X
Joe has to buy them so he can review them! That's what a reviewer does.

Exactly what's wrong about tuning in to him? I'm lost here.

You're telling me this like I bought it which I didn't.

Apparently I forgot to post this review also:
YouTube video

Anyways, you're missing the point. No End says the dude hasn't reviewed a small percentage of well known fighting games and I call bullcrap on that. The videos prove how wrong he is. KoF, MK, SC, FF, and MvC are well known so bite me.

Why review games you hate? As stated, he doesn't have to review SFxT, a lot of publcations didn't. Why would HE have too? And the review in quistion IS NOT a review at all. It's a rant, there is especially no reason to have bought a game just to rant about something you could have found out about by looking at the front page of SRK.

In this regard, he's demonstrating that he actually likes the game more than he hates the DLC, thus he'll "put up with". But that isn't what's being said. I think that's a serious issue if you want comapnies to stop taking advantage of you.

The reviews you posted WERE a small bit. He pretty much missed out on every fighter that wasn't made by Capcom, save for 3S😮E which he skipped, but reviewed FF😄I. Which is insane. The games No End listed, are probably the most poular fighters that aren't Capcom creations, save SCV and MK9. How can he not review T6?

Originally posted by NemeBro
Frisky Dingo is a brave man, to criticise Mortal Kombat in an argument with Smashbro.

Nemebro...quit trying to instigate.

Originally posted by Frisky Dingo
Why review games you hate?

You don't watch many reviews, do you?

Originally posted by Frisky Dingo
Why review games you hate?

facepalm

If reviewers only reviewed games they liked, then all games would have either great scores or no scores, which kind of defeats the purpose of reviewing. Bad reviews are needed to, to show that a bad game is bad, and even to point out legitimate faults of a good game so that a gamer who is thinking of picking it up would know what they are getting into.

blankaconfused

So.....are you guys addressing the 1st excerpt from my post-taking it out of context and ignoring the rest because you know, I'm right? Clearly publications review games they hate, that's the point of a review. But Joe is brought to the brink of insanity over something that is not part of the gameplay. If you are absolutely livid with a company, and you're not IGN, Gamespot, Famitsu, etc. You don't HAVE TO REVIEW EVERY GAME. The Angry Joe Show, clearly does not. If you can not understand why someone would raise the questions,

"So you hate what Capcom's doing, yet you buy, play (clearly he wants you to believe he's a consumer) and review Capcom fighters? Even though you're not obligated too, and you HAVE NOT reviewed SSFIV or T6?"

You skipped over two of the biggest fighters in the last decade, you can skip over SFxT, especially since you feel assaulted by the company that makes the game. If you're going to rant, don't do it with the damn disc in your hand and don't end the rant without telling people to NOT to buy the game. In fact, he only started to review Capcom fighters, or fighters period, when the controversies started. So excuse some of the more "aware" individuals when they question his integrity on these "issues". I'm sorry.

Then, IT WASN'T EVEN A REVIEW. HE DID NOT REVIEW STREET FIGHTER X TEKKEN. There was no need to have that disc in his hand, if he hated what Capcom was doing. HE DID NOT REVIEW THE GAME. What message is he trying to hammer home, here?

BnUx5BtTEfg&feature=related