Mario vs Dante

Which Mario now has. Just like Luigi had the Chaos Heart, and I already told you it's done things that do not involve the Chaos Heart.

The only thing ive seen is it countering the Chaos Hearts giant destruction thing of doom.

And how is Mario going to show an act of true love to use the Purity Heart?

if Dante is in no powers form than Dante will run from him

Originally posted by BloodRain
The only thing ive seen is it countering the Chaos Hearts giant destruction thing of doom.

And how is Mario going to show an act of true love to use the Purity Heart?

Originally posted by XMr. WinterX
if Dante is in no powers form than Dante will run from him

ok Mario cant just start with the star he has everything in his pockets...can he get it out and activate it before Dante just shoots in to death with a jack-pot shot?

No.

He doesn't have to, it's still touching his body and will activate.

And has not repelled power the likes of which Dante can bring to bear.

But BT, the function IS the feat!

In the case of protection in which case the function is to protect Mario. The no limit fallacy without a feat would be to claim the invulnerability it appears as in the game. If in truth its not got a canon feat (likely) then Mario having a star is useless. Dante still just shoots him in the head before he reacts.

Quit trolling and keep your daft fanon out of here.

facepalm2 noone is trolling dude

Originally posted by Burning thought
In the case of protection in which case the function is to protect Mario. The no limit fallacy without a feat would be to claim the invulnerability it appears as in the game. If in truth its not got a canon feat (likely) then Mario having a star is useless. Dante still just shoots him in the head before he reacts.

What? The Starman's got plenty of feats. Hell, the power of stars has been a part of Mario continuity since the beginning, and it's always been the same thing: unstoppable ownage to all who gets in Mario's way. The only way Mario ever dies during the Starman's invincibility is he falls down a pit, and let's face, that's gonna be a kill because Starman can't keep Mario invincible when he's falling thousands of feet into darkness a la 300.

Originally posted by MooCowofJustice
Quit trolling and keep your daft fanon out of here.

Stop whining, claiming "troll" is not a replacement for an argument.

Originally posted by XMr. WinterX
facepalm2 noone is trolling dude

And this

Originally posted by XanatosForever
What? The Starman's got plenty of feats. Hell, the power of stars has been a part of Mario continuity since the beginning, and it's always been the same thing: unstoppable ownage to all who gets in Mario's way. The only way Mario ever dies during the Starman's invincibility is he falls down a pit, and let's face, that's gonna be a kill because Starman can't keep Mario invincible when he's falling thousands of feet into darkness a la 300.

So tell me, whats its actual feat? show me the cinematic where the Starman powers Mario and he takes a big hit with gaugable power, from there we can then see how much damage Dante can do.

SMB1, Mario runs through Bowser with a star. >Dante.

Originally posted by Burning thought
Stop whining, claiming "troll" is not a replacement for an argument.

But your daft fanon is? 🙄

fanfiction? I think now you are the one trolling as I mentioned no fanfiction at all. Simply a mechanic in an argument. At the moment I dont think I even pointed out a fanfiction of yours so where your getting "fanon" from I dont know.

Originally posted by Burning thought
Stop whining, claiming "troll" is not a replacement for an argument.

And this

So tell me, whats its actual feat? show me the cinematic where the Starman powers Mario and he takes a big hit with gaugable power, from there we can then see how much damage Dante can do.

Just because it doeesn't have a cinematic feat doesn't mean it's not quantifiable. The fact that its ability has been carried through multiple games through the entirety of Mario's career is enough to justify it's power.

No, sorry but if all its been is a gameplay powerup then thats not a quantifiable canon gauge of its usefulness. Claiming its invincible just because Mario can survive fireballs or mushrooms hitting him while using it is a no limit fallacy.

Does it even have canon storyline text based around it? e.g. do the main characters mension it and its power? its deeds?

Originally posted by Burning thought
No, sorry but if all its been is a gameplay powerup then thats not a quantifiable canon gauge of its usefulness. Claiming its invincible just because Mario can survive fireballs or mushrooms hitting him while using it is a no limit fallacy.

Does it even have canon storyline text based around it? e.g. do the main characters mension it and its power? its deeds?

So according to what you're saying, nothing Mario's ever done is useable because practically his entire franchise is gameplay, yes?