Storm versus Squirrel Girl

Started by Tha C-Master4 pages

Originally posted by Silent Master
Logically speaking, anyone that can beat Thanos and Doom shouldn't have a problem beating Storm.
Logically anybody with meta stats that low shouldn't be winning either. 🙂 Hell Spider-Man and Wolverine have had their crazy feats too you know.

Originally posted by Tha C-Master
True, but you can't debate without logic though. There has to be a meeting ground. No logic is a logic in of itself.

Nah, these guys are beyond understanding in a medium which is pretty much in the grey already when it comes to logic. . Just think of Squirrel Girl like a high end reality warper who is less flashy about it.

Also it is not about high end feats, it`s the plain impossible like Lobo having leverage when he plain shouldn`t (where the quote was taken from) and SG beating up Ego the living planet.

Originally posted by Mshinu
Nah, these guys are beyond understanding in a medium which is pretty much in the grey already when it comes to logic. . Just think of Squirrel Girl like a high end reality warper who is less flashy about it.
There was actually a thread about this, throughout their history their high feats have accumulated so much, that honestly it isn't inconsistent anymore. The other characters are just more "accepted" how they are.

It's cool though, I don't mind her winning in the comics, I was just raising a point.

Point well taken, you need some common ground to debate but given comics are a fantasy it is pretty hard to do this most of the time (and out of the question when it comes to certain characters).

Lobo proving he is > logic.

http://www.imagebam.com/image/b431a795891482
http://www.imagebam.com/image/7c2cc395891483

credit to guy222

That is more of a character power or logic based on that world, in the debate logic applies still. (Lobo is awesome though).

No different than just about anything really with character powers, it does prove that generally comics do base logic off of the real world though.