Animal cruelty
Just saw this on the news
http://www.wpix.com/wpix-girl-puppies-river,0,283891.story
unbelievable...
Now hundreds of people are trying to find out who that is.
Animal cruelty
Just saw this on the news
http://www.wpix.com/wpix-girl-puppies-river,0,283891.story
unbelievable...
Now hundreds of people are trying to find out who that is.
Originally posted by Quiero MotaShe was laughing in the vid and enjoying throwing the poor things, just look HOW she throws them. She could just gave them away or anything and even if she had to kill them there would definately better ways doing so.
Not really. Maybe she felt she had no where to turn them. And turning puppies loose in the woods is as good as a death sentence anyways.
Originally posted by Bardock42
What were you trying to say about endangered species, blax?
6 puppies being thrown into a river really doesn't mean anything in the grand scheme of things. It's not like dogs are so rare that any fatalities threatens their population on the Earth. So, I don't really understand why people make a big deal about things like this. Sure, if I was walking down the street and saw some punk kids messing with a stray or something, I might tell them to **** off, or I might call the police, but I'm not going to go home afterwards and start crying manly tears or silently wish for all of the punk kids to be killed. "omg that girl should have her legs chopped off and thrown into a river! Ha!" Why? Did she really do anything of paramount importance?
Knee jerking of any kind is a pet peeve to me.
Originally posted by RE: Blaxican
6 puppies being thrown into a river really doesn't mean anything in the grand scheme of things. It's not like dogs are so rare that any fatalities threatens their population on the Earth. So, I don't really understand why people make a big deal about things like this. Sure, if I was walking down the street and saw some punk kids messing with a stray or something, I might tell them to **** off, or I might call the police, but I'm not going to go home afterwards and start crying manly tears or silently wish for all of the punk kids to be killed. "omg that girl should have her legs chopped off and thrown into a river! Ha!" Why? Did she really do anything of paramount importance?Knee jerking of any kind is a pet peeve to me.
Extraordinarily poor reasoning there. You could say the same thing about a murderer. The scope isn't what's important, but the act itself. It shows cruelty and malice and probable insanity and so the girl must be found or else it stands to reason that she may hurt/kill more animals or eventually people.
Originally posted by BackFire
[B]Extraordinarily poor reasoning there. You could say the same thing about a murderer.
In fact I do. I don't care when people die, unless I know them personally. There's almost 7 billion of us. I don't feel sadness or anger when some joe blow gets run over by a street car and it's shown on the news. Do you?
And, by the way, you're discussing morality with me right now. You know as well as I do that that's not a topic that "should" and "reasoning" have any place in.
The scope isn't what's important, but the act itself. It shows cruelty and malice and probable insanity and so the girl must be found or else it stands to reason that she may hurt/kill more animals or eventually people.
That's poor reasoning. No one has any idea why she did it or what circumstances were behind her doing it. Throwing puppies in a river, in and of itself, is hardly a diagnostic of one's personality. Certainly not something that by itself is worthy of being killed or thrown off a cliff or some shit.