Originally posted by truejedi
I think it is made pretty clearly by both the movie AND the novelization that Yoda owned Dooku. It is further confirmed in Dark Rendovous that Yoda owned Dooku.
You completely missed the point by including anything other than the scene.
Originally posted by Slash_KMC
The novel gives the advantage to Yoda, but from seeing the scene alone (as in the case of Grievous and Fisto) you can't say that Dooku was beaten.
Originally posted by Slash_KMC
Really, from this scene alone you decided that Yoda outclassed Dooku, plain and simple?Where exactly did Yoda gain any kind of advantage? Please tell me.
Again, where exactly did Yoda seem to have the upper hand here. Just disregard anything other than this scene.
Originally posted by Jinsoku Takai
Right on! And it's apparent - to a far lesser degree - that Fisto was all over Grievous.
Fisto didn't beat Grievous, I still stand by that.
I was comparing the two scenes, just like you can't say that Yoda had beaten Dooku by just seeing the scene, you can't say that Fisto is automatically better than Grievous by just seeing the scene.
Grievous may have lost a lightsaber in the fight, but that doesn't mean he was beaten. Darth Maul had his double lightsaber cut in half by Obi-Wan, does that mean Obi-Wan is better? Vader got his shoulder hit by Luke, does that mean Luke is better?