Resident Evil 6

Originally posted by FinalAnswer
But he has moar character then HUNK

Infact, HUNK has no character =|

@Phanteros

A new director could come along and just say "**** you" and bring back Wesker

Originally posted by Phanteros
I don't want Wesker to become another Sephiroth and just bring him back to milk more money. Perhaps we get some new villain that will be as interesting as him. but knowing Capcom...

It's fine as long as the character is done well =|

Is everybody forgetting Alex Wesker? His fate after disappearing is unknown and it's possible that he's still alive. Making him the next antagonist would be a better route to take for that beats having to bring back what's already dead (in other words: beats making PIS to enrage/confuse fans).

Nobody cares about ****ing Alex Wesker.

Originally posted by FinalAnswer
Nobody cares about ****ing Alex Wesker.

And why is that? He is the last surviving Wesker after all.

Originally posted by Nemesis X
And why is that? He is the last surviving Wesker after all.

Because he's a throw away villain that's leeching off the Wesker name?

Originally posted by FinalAnswer
But he has moar character then HUNK

Still, he is not as cool as HUNK.

Nor is HUNK anywhere near as cool as TOFU

Originally posted by FinalAnswer
Nor is HUNK anywhere near as cool as TOFU

will this one have co-op as well?

Originally posted by FinalAnswer
Nor is HUNK anywhere near as cool as TOFU

Originally posted by jinXed by JaNx
will this one have co-op as well?

We don't know yet. If i had to guess, i'd say probably not. They've been speaking about rebooting the series, and considering the majority of the games have been about one player and not two, i'd say it's just going to be one...

I still have no idea why so many people are whining about how "RE5 was not RE5" and how "it sucked teh bawls" when RE4 was Game of the Year over many times, all the while RE5 stuck to the same formula as RE4.

Yes, RE5 had the lamest boss (Wesker) ever. Still, that doesn't change the fact that the Las Plagas were present for RE5, and the co-op play was only MORE enhanced with Chris and Sheva (I still maintain that the A.I. was awesome) rather than run with a partner and protect a la RE4.

Personally, RE5's only flaw was the horrible choice for a final villain and, most importantly, how the final battle with said villain was fought. Ranting dialogue included.

Originally posted by Impediment
I still have no idea why so many people are whining about how "RE5 was not RE5" and how "it sucked teh bawls" when RE4 was Game of the Year over many times, all the while RE5 stuck to the same formula as RE4.

Yes, RE5 had the lamest boss (Wesker) ever. Still, that doesn't change the fact that the Las Plagas were present for RE5, and the co-op play was only MORE enhanced with Chris and Sheva (I still maintain that the A.I. was awesome) rather than run with a partner and protect a la RE4.

Personally, RE5's only flaw was the horrible choice for a final villain and, most importantly, how the final battle with said villain was fought. Ranting dialogue included.

The AI was better than most games, I'd agree. Sheva did have her dumb moments, though...

Originally posted by Impediment
I still have no idea why so many people are whining about how "RE5 was not RE5" and how "it sucked teh bawls" when RE4 was Game of the Year over many times, all the while RE5 stuck to the same formula as RE4.

Yes, RE5 had the lamest boss (Wesker) ever. Still, that doesn't change the fact that the Las Plagas were present for RE5, and the co-op play was only MORE enhanced with Chris and Sheva (I still maintain that the A.I. was awesome) rather than run with a partner and protect a la RE4.

Personally, RE5's only flaw was the horrible choice for a final villain and, most importantly, how the final battle with said villain was fought. Ranting dialogue included.

RE5 wasn't a great game. Simple as that.

I'm not saying that it was terrible... or even bad.... But it was below par in terms of Resident Evil.

Originally posted by §P0oONY
RE4 broke the mould... RE5 looked at the broken mould and tried to make some jelly/o in it.

RE5 wasn't a great game. Simple as that.

I'm not saying that it was terrible... or even bad.... But it was below par in terms of Resident Evil.

was still better than Code Veronica, imo.

Originally posted by -Pr-
was still better than Code Veronica, imo.

I'd still say that RE5 was the worst numbered RE game though.

Originally posted by §P0oONY
Code Veronica was below par too.

I'd still say that RE5 was the worst numbered RE game though.

tbh, that to me isn't saying much, given the quality of the other four games.

Originally posted by Impediment
I still have no idea why so many people are whining about how "RE5 was not RE5" and how "it sucked teh bawls" when RE4 was Game of the Year over many times, all the while RE5 stuck to the same formula as RE4.

Yes, RE5 had the lamest boss (Wesker) ever. Still, that doesn't change the fact that the Las Plagas were present for RE5, and the co-op play was only MORE enhanced with Chris and Sheva (I still maintain that the A.I. was awesome) rather than run with a partner and protect a la RE4.

Personally, RE5's only flaw was the horrible choice for a final villain and, most importantly, how the final battle with said villain was fought. Ranting dialogue included.

And how it utterly butchered Resident Evil's storyline, namely the only well developed character in the series, and got rid of the horror aspect, something RE4 had managed to keep.

As fun as co-op mode is, it completely ruined the atmosphere that RE had. Now it's just "KILL ****ING EVERYTHINGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG"

Naw, RE5 was complete and utter shit. Non-gameplay wise, anyway.

Who gives a shit about RE's storyline? It's always been campy, lol.

You guys are just racist. ahah