Originally posted by King Kandy
I think plenty of those characters could be debatable if people took a more level headed approach. But for instance, in any thread w/ Mandrakk, suggestions that he lose are usually met with "you obviously just didn't read/understand final crisis" which is a pretty blatant fallacy.
Originally posted by King KandyDebatable to an extent. But if you have two omnipotent characters fighting one another, then you will never get anything more than a stalemate in the end (which is why those types of threads tend to annoy me.)
I think plenty of those characters could be debatable if people took a more level headed approach. But for instance, in any thread w/ Mandrakk, suggestions that he lose are usually met with "you obviously just didn't read/understand final crisis" which is a pretty blatant fallacy.
As for the Mandrakk stuff: I do think you need to have a thorough understanding of the Superman Beyond books, if you are to understand exactly what he is/was, and debate intelligently in a thread he is involved in. After all, a mini as complex as SB needs to be read quite a few times before you begin to grasp everything that is going on in it (something not everyone has done)... But I do understand what you're saying.
Originally posted by Galan007
There are a lot of characters who have no place in versus threads.Beyonder
Mxy
CA Supeman
Mandrakk
Thanos /w/ HOTI
Etc.Any threads with the above characters almost always get closed. 👇
I will add to Your List :
Presence and all its manifestations/aspects ( could be far better for DC to never created such Judeo-Christian corelated Cosmology)
Mother Of Existence
The Endless