Which is the better villain performance

Originally posted by ADarksideJedi
the only one that can play Joker the right away will always be Jack N in the batman movie

😆 Are you serious?

Lecter
Chigurh
Joker
Landa.

i'd have to say Javier Bardem as Anton Chigurh

Originally posted by §P0oONY
There are a lot of good villains not on the list... However, he asked to rank the ones listed.

Oh I know, I'm just saying that Bill the Butcher is such a great villain that he should be on the list. Thus the "crucial omission."

Joker

Javier Bardem as Anton Chigurh is a better villain performance.

Originally posted by K.Diddy
😆 Are you serious?

Yep! 🙂

Originally posted by ADarksideJedi
Yep! 🙂

Why so serious?

Originally posted by Placidity
Why so serious?

😂

I found Jack quite cheesy compared.

Anton Chigurh narrowly over Lector and I haven't seen the other two...

Chigurh was a really creepy character, could be incredibly manic and frenzied but also calm and considered... and just plain weird too. Also providing Lector wasn't peckish or you weren't about to turn him in he might just leave you be but Chigurh would probably kill you without blinking.

The latest legendary villainous performance was the late Heath Ledger's, contender to become another villainous legend in hollywood.

Originally posted by KurtRussellCrow
i'd have to say Javier Bardem as Anton Chigurh

Me too, exceptional and out of the bad asses mentioned he´s the one I´d least like to meet in a dark alley.

Javier Bardem as Anton Chigurh

Originally posted by Lord Shadow Z
Anton Chigurh narrowly over Lector and I haven't seen the other two...

You're a member of a *film* forum and you haven't seen The Dark Knight or Inglourious Basterds?!

What the hell are you waiting for?

Originally posted by MildPossession
I found Jack quite cheesy compared.

I think he was perfect! 🙂

Originally posted by SnakeEyes
You're a member of a *film* forum and you haven't seen The Dark Knight or Inglourious Basterds?!

What the hell are you waiting for?

I have no desire to see either and like you've indicated KMC is much more than a film forum.

I see films I want to see and not just films some people seem to carry around like a badge of honour.

The Dark Knight and Inglourious Basterds are both modern masterpieces.

TDK was the best film of 2008, as was IB of 2009. Highly recommend you view them. I slept on IB and didn't catch it in the cinema as I should have, caught it on dvd as a rental. Totally worth it.

Originally posted by Darth Martin
The Dark Knight and Inglourious Basterds are both modern masterpieces.

TDK was the best film of 2008, as was IB of 2009. Highly recommend you view them. I slept on IB and didn't catch it in the cinema as I should have, caught it on dvd as a rental. Totally worth it.

Originally I was going to watch The Dark Knight but not at the cinema as I didn't want the experience to ruin my perceptions of the film. I was going to wait and watch it on DVD but I just grew disinterested about it. What I'm saying is I shouldn't 'have' to watch it as the other poster suggested.

I just don't get how some people are touchy with posters who haven't seen/or like The Dark Knight. Its like a cult or something...

As for IB I've never been in interested in Tarantino stuff after Pulp Fiction.

I'm not going to hate or dislike you if you choose not to view The Dark Knight. You are missing out though. It's neck-and-neck with Watchmen: Director's Cut as the best superhero film ever.

Inglorious Basterds>Pulp Fiction. Pulp Fiction outside of SLJ just isn't as great as everyone like to make it out to be.