movie better than book?

what part of the trilogy do you think improved on what was in tbhe book if any.

Less singing.

ya less singing..no 7pg description of what a city looks like

I was about to say nothing from the film is an improvment on the books, but you reminded me of the singing. The over-description doesn't bother me, given what Tolkien went through in life I wont begrudge him describing some magical land and it's quite possible that, without the descriptiveness, the films might not look as good.

I expect more but the movie disappoint me a little bit. i don't think the movie is better from the book.

It's sad that people seem to hate poëtry.

i dont hate it i actually like it. but after reading each book 3 or 4 times i find myself skipping it now for some reason

The stuff with Tom bombadile wasn't even put the in the movie for a reason!
i like the fact that the versions are a little different this way you can get a different experience reading and watching.
but most definetly i skip the singing in the books.

That's almost like watching Star Wars and skipping the scenes without lightsaber duels. 😛

well you can do that in episodes 1,2,3 cause the acting sucked balls light saber was the only thing good about those movies

The book had a lot of parts where my eyes kind of just glazed over. Tolkien's a good writer, but, imo he's too much of a world builder. The books are good but I do prefer the movies.