Which hero would be most dangerous in their universe if they became evil?

Started by Slaanesh5 pages

Reed or Surfer

Originally posted by chomperx9
is Lex anywhere near the most dangerous villain in DC ? NO

facepalm

Reed and friends kill the Surfer just like they did in Marvel Zombies.
Celestial kill gun will come in handy.
This Reed would also stay and learn as much as he could from the collective Reeds from other dimensions.
He'll be a tech nightmare.

Supes and Thor etc will be taken down after heavy loses.
Batman just doesn't cut it.

Reed. Surfer. Supes. Thor. GL. Bats.

Dr. Strange would be a nasty guy, if he went over to the dark side.

Well I guess we're ignoring the obvious answer: Squirrel Girl.

Surfer, he could end the universe with the number of powerful artefacts and sources of boundless energy he get... also, if he became a villain, he would likely do some plotting (he's got a decent brain and should have far more knowledger than Reed, about universal tech, magic, power) ...

Surfer, then Reed, then Strange

Reed you big dummies.

Reed by far, this isn't a contest. They might have a minor head start. Reed pulls stuff out of his ass and stomps.

Reed followed by the heralds. It hsould be boted however that someone like the SS could just kill the FF and steal all their crap to analyze with CA and figure out how to employ. Besides, his powers work over things he doesn't even understand.

Reed, I mean, if Doom is as good as he is, just imagine an evil Reed who wouldn't have his family to hold him back. Heck, even if Reed was just evil as Ozzymandias he would turn the planet's head.

Originally posted by Bentley
Reed, I mean, if Doom is as good as he is, just imagine an evil Reed who wouldn't have his family to hold him back. Heck, even if Reed was just evil as Ozzymandias he would turn the planet's head.

I don't think Ozymandias was evil, I think he was a well-intentioned person with a skewed sense of morals who believed the only way to save the world was with a huge lie and the deaths of millions. After his plan was a success he seemed rather haunted by what he had done and probably never got a full night's sleep again.

Ozzie saved the world.

Originally posted by 753
Ozzie saved the world.

Do you see him as morally superior or inferior to someone like R'as Al Ghul?

Originally posted by Omega Vision
I don't think Ozymandias was evil, I think he was a well-intentioned person with a skewed sense of morals who believed the only way to save the world was with a huge lie and the deaths of millions. After his plan was a success he seemed rather haunted by what he had done and probably never got a full night's sleep again.
All depends on your view of the Watchmen.Who i good and who is evil?

Originally posted by Omega Vision
Do you see him as morally superior or inferior to someone like R'as Al Ghul?

Yes morally superior because there was a clear and present threat actively threatening the world. The problem in the Watchmen somewhat revolves around Dr. Manhattan influencing events that made America seem much more of a threat to the Soviet Union. Winning Vietnam in a week was probably a very bad thing because could you imagine if the US had sent Manhattan after Russia? The place would be stomped flat in like a month. The fear is what made nuclear war so much more likely and Ghul just can't say that he stopped threats like that as far as I am aware.

Ozzy has moral highground on Ghul by far.

ice man would be a big threat

Reed makes a device that he combines Franklin and Doom instead of him.

Kinda like Reeds version of Onslaught.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
Do you see him as morally superior or inferior to someone like R'as Al Ghul?
Well, they are both extreme utilitarianists who find it legitimate to sacrifice a lot of innocent people to serve the greater good and save the world. I would view them as morally equivalent in this sense (of course, Ozymandias seemed primarily concerned with human welfare or, at least, was far more moderate in his environmentalism. To R'as, on the other hand, saving the world means saving the planetary ecosystem from the civilizations eating through it by destroying them)

However, R'as has been given a number of petty villanous traits over the years, specially regarding his relationship with his family and servants, that make him a much worse man than Ozzie. I think this may be a deliberate atempt by writers to reduce the simpathy his cause might garner from readers. Likewise, Poison Ivy is portrayed as both a violent green avenger and as a crazy serial killer that murders random people no comprehensible reason whatsoever.

Reed by far. No contest.

Reed is already a dick, would becoming evil really be that much of a stretch?
http://bp0.blogger.com/_LK8SXB4fIuU/RzUY0E3hPJI/AAAAAAAAADc/6Ky05iYBEG0/s1600-h/ff281.jpg