^ I'd say the backpedaling is coming from you since you've switched terms all over the place. But let's say it's not. Ok. Granted that you've been absolutely consistent with your position, you're switching from Thanos "rocked" Galactus to Thanos "harmed" Galactus to Thanos "effected" Galactus does not mean you've changed what you said or backpedalled at all. Accordingly, I understand that your propensity to switch terms inexplicably must mean that you equate "rocked" to "harmed" to "effected." Here in this thread at least as it pertains to Thanos.
Therefore, it doesn't matter what terms you use, I know what you think Thanos did to Galactus. It's obvious from your very first choice of terminology, "rocked Galactus." I deny what you think happened to Galactus happened. However you choose to describe it. Unilaterally.
Since well... there's no way you haven't backpedalled all over the place by switching your terms. I mean... that would otherwise underscore the complete lack of faith you have in your own position.
Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
^ I'd say the backpedaling is coming from you since you've switched terms all over the place. But let's say it's not. Ok. Granted that you've been absolutely consistent with your position, you're switching from Thanos "rocked" Galactus to Thanos "harmed" Galactus to Thanos "effected" Galactus does not mean you've changed what you said or backpedalled at all. Accordingly, I understand that your propensity to switch terms inexplicably must mean that you equate "rocked" to "harmed" to "effected." Here in this thread at least as it pertains to Thanos.Therefore, it doesn't matter what terms you use, I know what you think Thanos did to Galactus. It's obvious from your very first choice of terminology, "rocked Galactus." I deny what you think happened to Galactus happened. However you choose to describe it. Unilaterally.
Since well... there's no way you haven't backpedalled all over the place by switching your terms. I mean... that would otherwise underscore the complete lack of faith you have in your own position.
Are you honestly talking to me? I think you're talking to Quanchi... If not then I'll ask you to point to ANY post in the other thread (where this argument is) where I said he rocked Galactus. Once you don't find such a thing.. then I'll ask you to concede I never did any such thing. I never switch my terminology at all.
Originally posted by Colossus-Big CI've never switched my terms ever. I see rocking someone as having an affect on someone. You might not but that's just silly.
^ I'd say the backpedaling is coming from you since you've switched terms all over the place. But let's say it's not. Ok. Granted that you've been absolutely consistent with your position, you're switching from Thanos "rocked" Galactus to Thanos "harmed" Galactus to Thanos "effected" Galactus does not mean you've changed what you said or backpedalled at all. Accordingly, I understand that your propensity to switch terms inexplicably must mean that you equate "rocked" to "harmed" to "effected." Here in this thread at least as it pertains to Thanos.Therefore, it doesn't matter what terms you use, I know what you think Thanos did to Galactus. It's obvious from your very first choice of terminology, "rocked Galactus." I deny what you think happened to Galactus happened. However you choose to describe it. Unilaterally.
Since well... there's no way you haven't backpedalled all over the place by switching your terms. I mean... that would otherwise underscore the complete lack of faith you have in your own position.
Originally posted by BobbyDBased on what ?
I gotta go with the gruesome twosome here. Granted it will only be a KO, but a loss is a loss.