Red Hood would be a damn good story line. but if Nolan decided to do redhood they should put Jason todd in the next film and have him die.
and 4th film start a whole new story different villains like maybe Deadshot or Deathstroke.
And have Redhood appear in the 5th film. reason why it would be cooler for him to appear 2 movies later so its more of a surprise opponent and him not appearing again so soon after his death.
Originally posted by chomperx9
it was on twitter my bad. someone posted a link on another message board i go on.i stay off of myspace twitter facebook. ive seen to many stuff on the news already from criminals and hackers getting others information
thats very understandable
Originally posted by chomperx9
Red Hood would be a damn good story line. but if Nolan decided to do redhood they should put Jason todd in the next film and have him die.and 4th film start a whole new story different villains like maybe Deadshot or Deathstroke.
And have Redhood appear in the 5th film. reason why it would be cooler for him to appear 2 movies later so its more of a surprise opponent and him not appearing again so soon after his death.
the problem with red hood is that jason todd has to be established first quite possibly as robin , besides dick grayson would be first as robin, besides i'm not sure nolan will ever have robin in any of his batman films
Originally posted by BruceSkywalkerThats what i meant when i said Jason Todd needs to be appear 1st. I meant as robin
thats very understandablethe problem with red hood is that jason todd has to be established first quite possibly as robin , besides dick grayson would be first as robin, besides i'm not sure nolan will ever have robin in any of his batman films
But i agree there with Dick Grayson he was the 1st Robin. I dont think there will ever be a batman movie where they put Jason todd or Tim Drake to appear 1st before Grayson.
I guess thats one thing Batman and Robin didnt screw up is that they used the 1st robin.
come to think of it though it would have matched the description of the movie better if they used Tim Drake 😱
Originally posted by BruceSkywalker
thats very understandablethe problem with red hood is that jason todd has to be established first quite possibly as robin , besides dick grayson would be first as robin, besides i'm not sure nolan will ever have robin in any of his batman films
Originally posted by Omega Vision
Nolan is taking a Year One type approach with his films. He says Robin will probably never appear in any Batman movie in his series since he's portraying a young Batman.
i think Nolan might follow Batman : Dark Victory or aspects of it..
Originally posted by chomperx9
Thats what i meant when i said Jason Todd needs to be appear 1st. I meant as robinBut i agree there with Dick Grayson he was the 1st Robin. I dont think there will ever be a batman movie where they put Jason todd or Tim Drake to appear 1st before Grayson.
I guess thats one thing Batman and Robin didnt screw up is that they used the 1st robin.
come to think of it though it would have matched the description of the movie better if they used Tim Drake 😱
Robin was just old enough to be Bruce's brother 🙁
Originally posted by chomperx9
They should focus on making the movie 1st and after its done then have a matching movie title for the film
I'm sure Nolan will explain the title at some point during the movie
Please for the love of god, no Robin he is a douche.
as for the villian this time around, I would of loved to of seen the riddler sort of protrayed like the one from The Batman (cartoon)
i think Nolan has said he won't do a villian that would take away from the movie being serious and realistic.
maybe Mr. Freeze?
"hello, mr nolan, i'd like to talk to you about the less-than-great title for the third (and your final) batman movie!
IT'S NOT THAT GOOD
first of all, not wanting to do something that's "been done before" is somewhat ironic don't you think
second ..... THE CAPED CRUSADER
third ..... MANBAT
that is all"
*click*
mr nolan: who the hell was that???
Originally posted by -Pr-
what's wrong with Robin?
I don't really want Robin either. But I would like to see Nolan's realistic approach to him.
The most logical reason to have Robin is not because Batman wants a partner - but because he wants an heir to his mantle, in case something happens; age, injury, death etc. So he finds someone and takes him under his wing, brings him out for occasional missions, but makes sure he has the normal life he doesn't make time for. They established in TDK the problem with Batman copycats out there. Maybe Batman finally finds one he thinks he can mold.
Plus, Nolan would totally armour 'his Robin' up like Batman, as opposed to the flighty costume of the comics.