Originally posted by BruceSkywalker
when dc wants a pregnant lois we will have her..
At the moment all reasons against it are speculation since AFAIK such a thing has never happened in mainstream continuity so we don't know if its possible.
As for the whole baby killing Lois from the womb theory while it does have weight comics have shown time and time again that powers are selective in their application, particularly strength. Hence why Superman doesn't destroy his entire city block if he tosses and turns at night.
Originally posted by Omega Vision
This.At the moment all reasons against it are speculation since AFAIK such a thing has never happened in mainstream continuity so we don't know if its possible.
As for the whole baby killing Lois from the womb theory while it does have weight comics have shown time and time again that powers are selective in their application, particularly strength. Hence why Superman doesn't destroy his entire city block if he tosses and turns at night.
exactly.
so:
Originally posted by Bentley
Second this. So sad that Pr didn't think about it before posting nonesense 😖hifty:
i did think of it, though. 😛
clark is usually the exception when it comes to kryptonians, not the rule.
it should be near impossible for lois and clark to have a baby although i am sure if anyone was to break the rule it be superman.
the triple Kryptonian helix should be as different as a Horse to a fish.
I personally think that if Lois were to get pregnant she might be able to carry the child to term.
the fetus shouldnt get sufficient sunlight to manifest any powers it took clark years and only fully developed after his 18th birthday.
prior to that he was just an exceptionally robust teen easily explained by farm livin.
although, i also think her Lois should have a high rate of miscarriage this is just my opinions.
if i recall there have bn what if stories and alternate realities where lois dies due to certain complications.