Poll
60%
40%
Idk about that blade has a lot more skill than Daken IMO and thats where he kept getting punked by Castle. He got too uppity and thought he had put him down when the reality was FrankenCastle durability thought it was a tickle. Blade isn't going to make that mistake and leave himself open to shots that normally shouldn't hit him. He wouldn't stop until Franks head was removed and his heart torn out and crushed. So I think he'd do better than Daken. That said I think Frank takes this 6/10 vs Blade maybe even a 50/50 shot depending on whose writing blade.
Originally posted by Trackz
Blade has advantages that Daken didn't, such as the fact that his sword will take off a limb if he makes contact also he's not as cocky as Daken, which was one of the reason Daken was beaten so badly.Really wish these two had met in a comic though.
Good point. Daken was being careless, but there were other moments in the fight when he was going all-out and Castle was still handing it to him.
Blade is quite skilled though..
Originally posted by TheGame17Blade's sword gives him more range, but people are forgeting that Frankencastle still has his advanced weaponry
I dunno... Punisher was sliced up pretty good by Daken and Wolverine and still gave damage...
it's also been confirmed that as Frank was slower as frankencastle
So durability, strength,equipment all go to frank
while blade only has skill (but frank is no slacker himself) and speed
frank probably wins 6 out of ten
Originally posted by MrMindwolverine and daken tried to fight frank like they fight other people, they thought they could output more damage than frank could and take more damage, and they were wrong, if they had used their speed it might've been a different fight, and Blade/Wolverine was a stated stalemate in the comic and out of it by people at Marvel.
blade isn't going to stand a chance against somebody who could woop daken and wolverine asses. and wolverine already beat blade at civil war