Superskrull vs Black Adam

Started by darthgoober5 pages

Also, I thought I'd point out that "No CIS" isn't actually a stipulation in this thread, that's just something that batdude and I got sidetracked on. That's why I said that I could see the trick working a couple of times out of 10 rather than something like batdudes counter pitch of "Black Adam wins 10/10 via magic-drenched fists before SS can react.".

BA flies at SS and he dies

Originally posted by Sr J-Bieb
BA flies at SS and he dies

Thor's had too tough a time with the guy in melee for me to buy BA winning that easily.

Originally posted by Sr J-Bieb
BA flies at SS and he dies
BA dies?

Originally posted by darthgoober
But we're not talking about something without a precedent because it's something SS's done before.

how many times? how consistently?

Originally posted by -Pr-
how many times? how consistently?

Once for sure in combat that I know of, and homeboy said he knew of once during an interrogation. Nowhere near enough to justify him using it for the majority against anyone in a thread featuring CIS, but enough to justify him using it occasionally in a normal thread and often in a CIS free thread.

Originally posted by darthgoober
Once for sure in combat that I know of, and homeboy said he knew of once during an interrogation. Nowhere near enough to justify him using it for the majority against anyone in a thread featuring CIS, but enough to justify him using it occasionally in a normal thread and often in a CIS free thread.

so nothing that's going to sway the majority, then?

Originally posted by -Pr-
so nothing that's going to sway the majority, then?

In this thread, Hell no. I made that pretty clear even at the start...

Originally posted by darthgoober
BA would win, but if SS fought smart he could make Adam work for it and could probably take a couple.

Originally posted by batdude123
He may make him earn his victories, but SS isn't beating Adam.

Originally posted by darthgoober
IDK, I could see the force field in the brain trick working at least a couple of times out of 10.

He's done it once on panel in how many appearances?

Originally posted by batdude123
He's done it once on panel in how many appearances?

Does it matter when we're talking about an infrequent use in a thread featuring CIS or in a thread that's completely CIS free?

Think about it like this, how many times has Supes used his "aura vision" in his far greater number of appearances? If it's only two or three times, do you refuse to recognize his ability to do so in a thread where it's actually relevant?

But just so we're clear, what are you actually arguing here? That SS lacks the ability to create force fields inside of someone, that he lacks the inclination, or that he simply shouldn't be allowed to do so?

Originally posted by darthgoober
Does it matter when we're talking about an infrequent use in a thread featuring CIS or in a thread that's completely CIS free?

Think about it like this, how many times has Supes used his "aura vision" in his far greater number of appearances? If it's only two or three times, do you refuse to recognize his ability to do so in a thread where it's actually relevant?

But just so we're clear, what are you actually arguing here? That SS lacks the ability to create force fields inside of someone, that he lacks the inclination, or that he simply shouldn't be allowed to do so?

Think about it like this, you don't see anybody in a CIS-free thread argue that Superman is going to vibrate his opponent out of existence, or T-Vo him into oblivion (at least, not anymore). A character going all-out with no-CIS doesn't mean we cherry-pick obscure feats that are hardly, if ever duplicated.

So again, and this time you've got a mod reiterating the point, "No CIS" =/= "I control every move the character makes tourney-style."

Teth should win at least 8/10.

Originally posted by batdude123
Think about it like this, you don't see anybody in a CIS-free thread argue that Superman is going to vibrate his opponent out of existence, or T-Vo him into oblivion (at least, not anymore). A character going all-out with no-CIS doesn't mean we cherry-pick obscure feats that are hardly, if ever duplicated.

So again, and this time you've got a mod reiterating the point, "No CIS" =/= "I control every move the character makes tourney-style."


In case you haven't noticed, I posted a mods actually ruling on the matter and pr didn't seem to have a problem with what I was saying once he realized what it was...

Originally posted by darthgoober
Once for sure in combat that I know of, and homeboy said he knew of once during an interrogation. Nowhere near enough to justify him using it for the majority against anyone in a thread featuring CIS, but enough to justify him using it occasionally in a normal thread and often in a CIS free thread.

Originally posted by -Pr-
so nothing that's going to sway the majority, then?

But let's ignore what the mods seem to be saying about it and say that everything's set up the way you want, does that mean I'll never see you pitch a lightspeed blitz from Supes in a CIS free thread?

And again...

Originally posted by darthgoober
Does it matter when we're talking about an infrequent use in a thread featuring CIS or in a thread that's completely CIS free?

Think about it like this, how many times has Supes used his "aura vision" in his far greater number of appearances? If it's only two or three times, do you refuse to recognize his ability to do so in a thread where it's actually relevant?

But just so we're clear, what are you actually arguing here? That SS lacks the ability to create force fields inside of someone, that he lacks the inclination, or that he simply shouldn't be allowed to do so?

Looking back over the whole thing now, I can see that pr may have been saying that the instances I cited isn't enough for most people rather than asking if I thought SS would use the tactic frequently. pr clarify please?

Originally posted by darthgoober
Looking back over the whole thing now, I can see that pr may have been saying that the instances I cited isn't enough for most people rather than asking if I thought SS would use the tactic frequently. pr clarify please?

the "isnt enough for most people" part.

I recall two times using a bubble inside someone's body, one inside a Skrull's brain.

i often think CIS doesnt necessarily hamper a character in a forum fight.

in a comic he will not be written to the best of his ability or kill even when his mindset and personality would make it the most obvious attack.

i guess PIS would fit more then CIS.....b/c SS can and would use such a tactic to kill regularly if he were allowed to.

Originally posted by batdude123
He may make him earn his victories, but SS isn't beating Adam.

Originally posted by -Pr-
the "isnt enough for most people" part.

So how many times do you feel that someone has to preform a specific tactic in order for it to be a valid tactic in a forum fight without CIS? Also, does this mean that you're overturning Bada's ruling on the matter?

fight, fight, fight...

Mom and Dad fight!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4aMD4uy-QGc