Originally posted by Bardock42
lol, thanks. Well I do get that, it's extremely preachy and somewhat self-righteous what I said. It's a hard topic to put into terms that don't sound judgmental though. Like I said, I don't want to blame RJ, I know he's a great guy and he doesn't mean it that way, and by no means do I want to put a spotlight on him, he's definitely not one of the worst doing that, most of us have and still do it. If anything I bring it up with RJ because I know that he is ultimately a good guy who doesn't mean it that way and won't take particular offense when I point it out.
Live in the ghetto for a while and you'll see it.
It's not that it's sexist, it's that there are hardly any ghetto gal that can resist turning into a ghetto hoochie mama when ever they get flustered. I've even seen high powered women from where I work (that are topped out in the salary bracket...you know where I work so you know what I mean) turn, immediately, into the ghetto hoochie mama whenever they get pissed. You can take the hoochie mamma out of the ghetto...and you can even teach her how to act like a businesswoman...but you can never take the ghetto hoochie mamma out of the woman. Well, I guess the same can be said of any major subculture: it's hard to get rid of your origins and where you grew up.
My point is, I do not see it as being even remotely sexist. For me, I see it is a strong attitude that "gets sh*t done" but is unsightly when done by a man in the work environment.
Originally posted by Bardock42
That's really what my last post before this one was trying to say, celebrating our differences is great, treating each other with respect is necessary in that way though. There are ways to go about it jokingly that are not negative at all. That don't lower ones standing to raise the others. What we say does mean something though, and being mindful of that is important, and recognizing the difference can be hard.
Calling attention to some women getting "bat sh*t crazy" during their period is not sexist, is it? Some women really do. If a person said that all women get like that, yes, that's sexist. But if the person said, "Some women get bat sh*t crazy during their periods" that's not sexist, that would be true.
Same with calling attention to IQ stats: saying that Sub Saharan Africans are, on average, possessing a lower IQ than any other race demographic is not racist: it's true. The sexism and racism comes in behind the "intentions" of the statements. I guess you could call it a form of "mens rea".
Frankly, I like the "differences" and I find womanly women quite attractive. 🙂 That's sexist, right? facepalm
Originally posted by Bardock42
I did actually get that image from what he said (which I guess shows my indoctrination towards certain stereotypes, true as they may be) and you are very right that the heat of an argument is very different from something you'd say if you had time to think, but it doesn't change what I was saying.
It does change what you were saying: what you said he was saying was not what he was meaning or implied.
Originally posted by Bardock42
Well, actually this "chivalrous" mindset is in itself sexist, we can discuss that too if you'd like. But it would be good if you kept in mind that I don't think John is sexist as a person, what I think is that he (and many, many others on here including me) at times use sexist language and that we should all try to be more aware of it and change our speech where it is prejudiced or implicating harmful stereotypes.
LOL! That was my EXACT argument against it. hahahahahaha
I said that the "chivalrous" ideas were sexist in and of themselves. I asked why we shouldn't get to hit back women. He said, "beause they are weaker and smaller." Then I said this, "So if a shorter skinnier dude hits you, you can't hit him back by the same exact logic you can't hit a woman, right?"
"No. You can hit him back. He's a dude."
"No you can't, you just said that you wouldn't hit a women because she's weaker and smaller, so sex has nothing to do with it as your only reasons were the "weaker and smaller" aspects so it easily translates to any human that meets your criteria of weaker and smaller."
WEEEEEE!
Originally posted by Bardock42
I am not sure what Blax did get warned for, which is why I'd like to
know exactly, I certainly haven't taken offense to anything he said.
Using the "friendly" form of the "n-word."
Originally posted by Bardock42
I agree with DDM, you should show your boss, that guy is obviously unstable.
Indeed. He's going to get out of his car one night and get stabbed or beaten with a bat. Or worse: his tires slashed. 😆
Originally posted by Mr. Rhythmic
Most guys I know like to go home, turn on the TV, and eat some wings with no care of the outside world.
HOLY SH*T! That's soooooo true!
I don't watch TV, but I'd love to eat some wings and watch a movie and Instant Netflix stuff. (Same thing, though.)