HP/DD Gauntlet

Started by quanchi11234 pages

Originally posted by Lord_Talron
scans of thanos killing someone whom he has already killed once in the same way he killed them before, despite them having evolved past being able to be killed in that way. im waiting
There's no proof he can't be killed in the same way therefore the burden is on you.

Originally posted by Black bolt z
I asked bada about it.He said that for BFR and coming back from the dead there was no official rule but he said it would/should be a 10 count.

But he can't make it back in that "reasonable amount of time"

There's no official rule so he does come back in a reasonable amount of time though he's not weakened or dying here so it's a moot point.

Originally posted by Black bolt z
Galactus and inbetweener were being hurt by physcial force(or at least what appeared to be physical force as they were just duking it out) by each other.

Rulk anyone?

Originally posted by quanchi112
There's no proof he can't be killed in the same way therefore the burden is on you.
nope. scans please

Originally posted by quanchi112
There's no proof he can't be killed in the same way therefore the burden is on you.

Negative proof fallacy alert.

Originally posted by Prep-Man
Rulk anyone?
Was this in his leobforce state?

Originally posted by Omega Vision
Negative proof fallacy alert.
i wear my glasses every day to keep zebra out of my front yard. it works, as i wear my glasses every day and theres no zebra in my yard.

see also: donald rumsfeld, " the absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence"

Originally posted by Omega Vision
Negative proof fallacy alert.

I really don't see why. I can claim that Hobgoblin can't be killed the same way twice, and i'd be expected to post a scan supporting it. So, why not for DD?

Originally posted by King Kandy
I really don't see why. I can claim that Hobgoblin can't be killed the same way twice, and i'd be expected to post a scan supporting it. So, why not for DD?

You miss the point of contention.

The claim made was that there's no proof that Thanos can't kill someone who can evolve past being killed in that way and someone has to shell out proof that he can't.

That's demanding negative proof.

As for Doomsday, I don't think its so much a matter that he becomes totally impervious to the means with which he was killed as much as it is that he adapts a countermeasure to defeat the threat after rezzing.

Say for instance Thanos kills him with an energy blast, Doomsday might return with the ability to absorb massive amounts of energy with his bone spurs acting like solar panels.

That was the point Hunter Prey made when he defeated the Radiant in round two.

Originally posted by Lord_Talron
nope. scans please
You are asking me to prove you wrong when you never proved he can't be killed in the same way.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
Negative proof fallacy alert.
I'm glad you spotted him trying to use this on me too.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You are asking me to prove you wrong when you never proved he can't be killed in the same way.

I'm glad you spotted him trying to use this on me too.


Phail.

Originally posted by Omega Vision

That was the point Hunter Prey made when he defeated the Radiant in round two.
round one and round two of DD vs Radiant were years apart

Originally posted by Omega Vision
Phail.
So you believe if he gets blasted by energy blasts energy blasts can never kill him again ?

Originally posted by Starscream M
round one and round two of DD vs Radiant were years apart

What's your point?
Originally posted by quanchi112
So you believe if he gets blasted by energy blasts energy blasts can never kill him again ?

No. It obviously depends on the energy blast. Imperiex put him down for good. But Thanos isn't close to Imperiex.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
What's your point?
ummm...that he doesn't get years to evolve in this battle against thanos?

Originally posted by Starscream M
ummm...that he doesn't get years to evolve in this battle against thanos?

He doesn't need years to adapt. H/P made that clear.

Besides read the OP:

Originally posted by Black bolt z
Every time Doomsday dies he gets to come back.

How many times does he when fighting these people until he can beat them?

1: Vulcan
2: Superman
3: Void
4: Thanos
5: Darkseid
6: Zues
7: Odin
8: RKT
9: Mephisto
10: Shaper of Worlds
11: Kubik
12: Magus w/ a CCU
13: No name Celestial
14: Exitar
15: Galactus at full power
16: Death
17: Thanos w/ IG
18: LT

No mention of any kind of time limit.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
He doesn't need years to adapt. H/P made that clear.

Besides read the OP:

No mention of any kind of time limit.

ok, my bad, didn't read OP...it's kinda a retarded scenario as it will be pure speculation

Originally posted by Omega Vision
What's your point?

No. It obviously depends on the energy blast. Imperiex put him down for good. But Thanos isn't close to Imperiex.

So there's no proof he can resist attacks just the force of the attacks. I just destroyed the hilarious theory he can't die the same way twice. I'm on a roll.

Originally posted by quanchi112
So there's no proof he can resist attacks just the force of the attacks. I just destroyed the hilarious theory he can't die the same way twice. I'm on a roll.

On a roll? Like a sheep on a slaughterhouse conveyor belt?

But I suppose that's a crude comparison that insults the intelligence of the average sheep.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
On a roll? Like a sheep on a slaughterhouse conveyor belt?

But I suppose that's a crude comparison that insults the intelligence of the average sheep.

So do you believe the same method cannot work twice on DD ?