Originally posted by skekUng
I'm glad we agree on something.I've only been calling for a civil conversation since you first decided to attack 'the new guy' for daring to address an established member. You do not want a civil conversation, though. You want me to do your research for you. That is not a civil conversation. See, when you provide no information that establishes your position (other than vague statements of support for a concept you refuse to define yourself) it makes it that much easier for you to claim that you're being trolled and that you're never wrong. The very first thing you said to me was that I was too new to have my points addressed, now you want me to have a conversation with you in PM for the sake of what? So you can hurl even more obtuse and hateful accusations with the benefit of none of the moderators seeing them? The PM button works both ways. If you have something civil to say to me for the first time since you decided to address me, then feel free to send them on their way. Otherwise, tell us which of Mr. Romney's social and economic policies would have made him a better President than Mrs Palin and President Obama.
If you want to know, PM me.
If you want to troll, post about it here and never get the response that you obviously desperately need.
I will not PM you as I am not bursting to tell you my opinions. But, even if you are a sock troll, I will still humor you and give you my responses via PM IF you want them. (Taking it to PMs is the very thing most trolls do NOT want because they cannot fulfill their jollies when only one person sees their trolling.)
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
There you go raising the bar too high. 😂
😆
I think this is Lord Sorgo...and he's not even trying to hide the fact that he's a troll, anymore.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Unrelated and unneeded.You missed the point entirely.
Can you stop trolling for 2 seconds to have a civil conversation?
Originally posted by Robtard
The guy is hardly trolling, he's asking others to solidify their stance.No idea about the socking though.
I offered to give it to him in PMs but he is not interested in any sort of civil discussion. Still no PM. Lord Sorgo wants to try and make a fool out of me because of our past encounters so he wants it here, on the board.
Originally posted by King Kandy
Um, he is. He's asked you, straightforward, for your position on issues related to the thread (several times). You're the one who keeps calling him a troll and for the life of me I can't figure out why you think that, because he's been trying to continue the topic the whole time he's been here.
Please don't legitimize an obvious sock troll. Next time, please PM me if you disagree. You have no idea how much "lulz" that just gave Lord Sorgo.
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Are you an official troll now?
I'm just assuming it's not to be harassed and blamed for the behavior of others. If you participate to have a discussion, then we're here for the same reasons. If you are only participating in this discussion to stir the turd, then trolling becomes as subjective accusation.
Originally posted by dadudemon
I offered to give it to him in PMs but he is not interested in any sort of civil discussion. Still no PM. Lord Sorgo wants to try and make a fool out of me because of our past encounters so he wants it here, on the board.Please don't legitimize an obvious sock troll. Next time, please PM me if you disagree. You have no idea how much "lulz" that just gave Lord Sorgo.
You have very deep issues with this sock troll you keep addressing. If you need me to be him, that's fine. But if that's all you have to offer any discussion in which we both find ourselves, then that makes you the problem. Not being something that you constantly accuse me of being irritates me, but you're the one who seems to dwell on it to the point of paranoia. All I've asked for, repeatedly, is that you offer ANY personal insight into the statements you've made regarding Romney v. Obama/Palin. If not wanting to have a hidden conversation where you aren't held accountable for your insults doesn't explain itself after the barrage of accusations you've made against me in public, then I can't make it any more clear for you. Again, perhaps your aggressive approach to any new member is why this site suffers from trolling and why you personally feel so insecure.
Originally posted by Zeal Ex Nihilo
Nobody cares, you dramaqueen. Please start contributing to the discussion or stop posting.
Legitimate contribution has been my point from the beginning. You might just have issues with me because I illustrated how your support for moderately progressive conservatives is exactly what you're getting from the current President. Don't act like I'm taking anything said in this forum more or less personally than you are.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Read Robtard's post in the other thread. Obama has disappointed me, again. He failed to deliver on a major campaign promise.
So, again, you're unwilling to do your own work. I have to read a third party's post to understand what you should be more than capable of explaining yourself?
Originally posted by Zeal Ex Nihilo
Armchair psychology at its finest. You are fat.
Maybe I am. But one's physical appearance, other than that of Mitt Romney looking presidential, isn't the point. You have tyo admit that if, even for a second, you didn't think I was a troll, that his behavior comes across as paranoid.
Originally posted by Zeal Ex Nihilo
Please go away. You have contributed nothing to this thread except derailment.
Why don't we all leave together and make this a better site?
I've asked for specifics to further the conversation. Defending myself is an unintentional detrailing of the coversation made necessary by the paranoia entertained by some members.
Originally posted by Zampanó
I would like to hear this, and I am sad that no one else does.
Finally, someone wants to know.
I thought no one would ask. (Dead serious: I was dying to tell...yes, I'm that pathetic.)
So this is how I did it: I saw one of Mitt Romney's campaign people (like, one of the leads or something), during the republican nominations in 2008, call him for some sort of "cute" speaker-phone update for the news cameras (one of those publicity things where the campaign manager calls to check in with the candidate to see how things went in *insert generic town/city name here*). The camera was in front of the desk and they had setup the angle so that there was stuff in the way so we couldn't see what the campaign dude dialed. Smart, right?: if no one can see what the campaign dude dials, they won't get the candidate's cell #? You follow so far? If not, it won't matter for this next part...
Despite the news station and the campaign person taking precautions to ensure that no one could see what was dialed, they left out one very crucial piece: most modern phones make "beeps" in different "two-tone" sounds when pressed and that tone is the same on almost of these so-called "touch-tone" phones. The Lead hit speaker button and then dialed so I heard everything he dialed. All I had to do was replicate the tones and I got his number. Since the campaign office was not local to were Romney got his cell, the Lead had to dial the area code, as well...making my job even easier. (If not, I could have quickly figured out his area code based on both his campaign office's location or his home location using getzips.com.)
Badda-boom, badda-bang: I got his number. I waited until the evening the next day because I wasn't going to be a stalker douche and call him in the late evening (7 or 8-ish, CST, but I think it was 8 or 9 EST, where Romney was). All I planned to do was call him and wish him luck (at the time, I only supported Obama, so I wasn't going to say something douchy). Like I said, the first time, he was at a diner with his family, eating. Second time, he said he was busy. I felt bad for figuring his shit out and then bugging him...but it was still a fun challenge, none-the-less.
I hope I didn't just give some kids out there, reading KMC, bad ideas. 🙁
Originally posted by skekUng
You have very deep issues with this sock troll you keep addressing. If you need me to be him, that's fine. But if that's all you have to offer any discussion in which we both find ourselves, then that makes you the problem. Not being something that you constantly accuse me of being irritates me, but you're the one who seems to dwell on it to the point of paranoia. All I've asked for, repeatedly, is that you offer ANY personal insight into the statements you've made regarding Romney v. Obama/Palin. If not wanting to have a hidden conversation where you aren't held accountable for your insults doesn't explain itself after the barrage of accusations you've made against me in public, then I can't make it any more clear for you. Again, perhaps your aggressive approach to any new member is why this site suffers from trolling and why you personally feel so insecure.
Please stop trolling. I told you I would not address this type of dialogue, anymore.
I have asked you nicely and I am trying to be civil with you.
If you want to know, PM me. If you do not, do not bring it up.
Originally posted by skekUng
So, again, you're unwilling to do your own work. I have to read a third party's post to understand what you should be more than capable of explaining yourself?
Please stop trolling.
I clearly explained what Robtard was talking about in the other thread. I even looked it up and posted a news article on it to prove his post as accurate. If having to click one thread down to figure out a conversation, frustrates you, ask, politely, in this thread or via PM, in what context the post is being presented. Had either of those been done, I would have gladly linked you to the relevant post of mine.
Kind Kandy, do you see the difference, now, between a normal poster and a troll?
Originally posted by skekUng
Why don't we all leave together and make this a better site?I've asked for specifics to further the conversation. Defending myself is an unintentional detrailing of the coversation made necessary by the paranoia entertained by some members.
"If you want to know, PM me. If you do not, do not bring it up."
Originally posted by dadudemon
Please stop trolling. I told you I would not address this type of dialogue, anymore.I have asked you nicely and I am trying to be civil with you.
If you want to know, PM me. If you do not, do not bring it up.
Please stop trolling.
I clearly explained what Robtard was talking about in the other thread. I even looked it up and posted a news article on it to prove his post as accurate. If having to click one thread down to figure out a conversation, frustrates you, ask, politely, in this thread or via PM, in what context the post is being presented. Had either of those been done, I would have gladly linked you to the relevant post of mine.
Kind Kandy, do you see the difference, now, between a normal poster and a troll?
"If you want to know, PM me. If you do not, do not bring it up."
You can go into three paragraphs about stalking Mitt Romney, but putting that much effort into explaining why he would make a better president than Obama and Palin is too much effort? It's amazing that you trying to have a conversation about the topic of this thread in PM is more important than having a conversation about the direction in which you took the thread, in the thread. Don't play the happy, civil member with me. Both members who have accused me of newb butthurt, being a drama queen and a sock troll too new to actually address, are participating in this thread. Both of those members have repeatedly insulted me for no valid reason, other than participating in the conversation and expecting others to actually validate their own statements. On every other forum I've ever been on, you take private conversations to PM. I don't have anything to say to you in private because the only thing I've asked is for you to back up what you've asserted to be a valid statement.