Originally posted by Galan007
^ Huh? Matchups in the versus forum have to be based mainly on feats. Otherwise we would only have personal opinion to dictate the outcome of a given battle -- and I'm sure you can see why that is a horribly flawed way to go about things.
noneAnyhow, from a feat standpoint Magus doesn't even compare to Mordru. That much is unquestionable.
Originally posted by quanchi112If character A has better feats, and based on those feats, has more power than character B, then character A is going to win a versus battle every single time. Why? Because on panel feats can be used to prove character A is superior -- whereas baseless personal opinion is all character B has going for him/her.
Not feats alone but how they stack up against other characters. I don't say character a wins because they have more impressive feats than character b I factor in powers, feats, how they match up, etc.Magus seems more clever than Mordru as well.
Feats trump opinion. Flash Fact.
It's a bit unfair that while Thanos is immortal to a point I don't think that hes on Mordru's level of immortal. Destined to survive past the end of the universe is Galactus wtf pwn levels. Anyways Doomsday is weak link here but between Mordru and Prime they gonna take in 7-8/10 less if Mordru takes too much time on Magus.
Originally posted by Galan007
If character A has better feats, and based on those feats, has more power than character B, then character A is going to win a versus battle every single time. Why? Because on panel feats can be used to prove character A is superior -- whereas baseless personal opinion is all character B has going for him/her.Feats trump opinion. Flash Fact.
Galan i have a serious question for you. I understand what you are talking about. But lets takes the example of supes and thanos. Who is stronger?.
Thanos dont have the lifting feats thats supes does due to the fact hes a villain they dont lift stuff much. Yet thanos has backhanded and mulled multiple bricks at the same time. he has showed physical strength in manhandeling flocks of characters at the same time but just dont have the lifting feats. Who is stronger?
Dr. manhatten and Zuras are good examples of featless characters with the potential to dominate other characters that have tons of feats. Where i think its important to acknowledge on panel feats, I really think its important to address powersets too. Just becasue someone has more feats in one area dont meant he or she is going to win the fight. The more popular characters tend to have more feats due to the fact the are in comics more often. I guess this is just my opinion though.
anyhow mordrus team for the win prolly.
Originally posted by Galan007It isn't justbaseless opinion I argue based on the whole picture not just feats which you seem hell bent on doing.
If character A has better feats, and based on those feats, has more power than character B, then character A is going to win a versus battle every single time. Why? Because on panel feats can be used to prove character A is superior -- whereas baseless personal opinion is all character B has going for him/her.Feats trump opinion. Flash Fact.
By your reasoning Superman>>>>>Magus if we just go by feats, right ?
Originally posted by iceman24567He's been shown his future he's destined to lose every single time. He's the biggest loser of all whereas Magus was only defeated while he was depowered due to a cc Kang gave just to stop the Magus.
Magus more clever than Mordru surely he's joking? How many times did Mordru escape imprisonment from very powerful mages? He also escaped from the Spectre unharmed whereas ALL magic users in his weightclass were killed 😐. Quan is full of shit
Originally posted by kevdudeWho beats Thanos ?
Quan you are grasping at straws here... Superboy Prime team.
And feat for feat I still think Magus takes it against Mordru because of this bad boy which I forgot about due to reading it so long ago.
So I definitely think Magus can defeat Mordru even on his own.
http://i201.photobucket.com/albums/aa41/quanchi112/gotg_17_16.jpg
Originally posted by iceman24567
^I think you completely misunderstood what Galan was trying to explain 😬
While he may have missed the point in some ways, but also brings up a valid point still the same. In general, the pont Galan makes is of course correct, we go by feats, and said feats help to establish power levels for characters in a vs. fight. However, comics also have themes or people just don't have many appearances and thus feats. The point he brought up about Thanos vs. Superman (strength wise) is an obvious one that shows how you can't just look at feats all the time. I think that much should be universally agreed upon.
