Who could lift more?

Originally posted by King Castle
i could see that....mhmm he is magic afterall and powered by zues, atlas and hercules...

But even 1% of infinity is still infinity... No actually, there IS no such thing as 1,2 or 5% of infinity.

I'm referring to lifting NOT pulling. What is supes or xman best LIFTING feat?

Originally posted by SamZED
But even 1% of infinity is still infinity... No actually, there IS no such thing as 1,2 or 5% of infinity.

Indeed.

Let's just chalk it up as a wacky outlier and be done with it.

Or, simply acknowledge it as 'incalculable weight' as opposed to 'infinite', and then be done with it.

Originally posted by carver9
I'm referring to lifting NOT pulling. What is supes or xman best LIFTING feat?

Originally posted by Parmaniac
What does this have to do with anything?

A lot... it would help me with my judgement. Magneto lifted a city sized meteor with ease... what has xman or supes lifted under their own power?

Originally posted by carver9
A lot... it would help me with my judgement. Magneto lifted a city sized meteor with ease... what has xman or supes lifted under their own power?

Originally posted by Starscream M
They have in front of them a metal ball that can be made denser to increase its weight.

Who could lift the heaviest?

Magneto (Magnetism)

Superman (Physical Strength)

X-Man (Telekinesis)

We can use the Moon feat and split it into 3 if you want (Superman, WW, MM). that's still more than a city.

once you get into space pulling and lifting are very hard to separate as well

Originally posted by carver9
A lot... it would help me with my judgement. Magneto lifted a city sized meteor with ease... what has xman or supes lifted under their own power?

strength is strength.

and superman's feats STILL outclass it a "city sized meteor" by a fair way.

Carver logically pulling>lifting.

Now in space that might differ but i'm not a physicist...yet excellent

Originally posted by Black bolt z
Carver logically pulling>lifting.

Originally posted by -Pr-

and superman's feats STILL outclass it a "city sized meteor" by a fair way.

Originally posted by Starscream M
I'd beg to differ

then you'd be wrong. even byrne superman was lifting objects that were stated to be able to "crush metropolis with one step".

Originally posted by -Pr-
then you'd be wrong. even byrne superman was lifting objects that were stated to be able to "crush metropolis with one step".

Originally posted by Black bolt z
Carver logically pulling>lifting.

What?

Originally posted by Starscream M
so you could benchpress more than you could pull? I doubt it

Originally posted by Starscream M
and doesn't comics often show him with a hint of struggling even when lifting a large airplane

no. not often. not in the slightest.

would you like to see scans of him struggling?

Originally posted by King Castle
would you like to see scans of him struggling?

you're going to cherry pick scans just to prove a point, even though his average puts him in the millions if not billions of tons? go right ahead.

please, try to show me something i haven't seen before. ermm

Originally posted by Parmaniac
It seems you nitpick on the rules to give Mags the win here. You want a "non-pulling" feat while for Mags pulling/lifting is the same.

We can use the Moon feat and split it into 3 if you want (Superman, WW, MM). that's still more than a city.

The op said "LIFT" not pull. They are two different things. I can pull far more weight than what I can lift. I can pull a couch but I sure as hell can't lift it over my head.

Space... weight is completely gone... there really isn't a such thing as weight "in space". Everything basically float with free will. That is why I am asking you for a lifting feat. This isn't hard... show me one because magneto lifted the city with his magnetic powers.

I know of some of supes "lifting" feats but it is a far cry away frm lifting a city.