Originally posted by WhiteWitchKing
If you want to go by words, Thanos claimed Galactus was well nourished by looking at him. Thanos' claimed that, not Galactus. And there's no other indication to prove that it was more than just Thanos' opinion. In fact, Galactus says later that he would not have to consume any planets that day because he was going to end the thundering demands of his hunger.
I don't get how slow some people can be. Come on WWK you know better than this..... There was ZERO indication that Thanos readings weren't correct. Thanos is usually a very reliable source on such matters. To say nothing of the fact that it wasn't THANOS saying that.. in fact if we go deeper we know it was THE writer who had Thanos say that. It wasn't an accident or throw in there by mistake. The writer made Thanos say that for a reason, and that reason is to make it clear that Galactus was well-nourished. If something came up later that confirmed he wasn't and in fact hungry.. that would be something. However, there was nothing that indicated otherwise.
More stupid questions from Master. You see this is how comics work... The writer has people talk and give us information about a variety of things. Powerlevels, how they are feeling, their mission etc etc. That is how we get an idea of what is going on. THE WRITER had Thanos (reliable source with his tech) comment that he was well-nourished. This wasn't an accident or a mistake. If it was THE WRITER would've had it come up later that in fact Thanos was wrong. There was NOTHING ZERO NADA like that at all. So... then.. what do we conclude.. since the burden would be on you to prove that statement wrong (with no evidence so that is going to be hard eh?) So unless proven otherwise or stated otherwise by the writer later.. Thanos statement stands as this was the writers intent
Please point me to ANYWHERE that is used the term ALL statements. In fact, I made it clear something a writer has someone say something.. yet later have that same person or another say the other person was actually wrong. Are we slow today Master or are your stupid questions making you talk stupid in general.
STOP AVOIDING THE QUESTION...
When reading comics do we more of then not take what characters say as the truth or do we more often than not say whatever comes out of their mouth is a lie? Very simple question. We aren't talking about extremes we are talking about most of the time who are we suppose to read comics. Answer the question.
Really.. which stance of mine was stupid. May stance is we are suppose to take what people say at face value the majority of time. Unless circumstances change or something is later said to disprove said statement.
YOUR STANCE IS: The majority of time we assume the characters are lying and not telling us the truth. The writer in fact is having characters say a whole bunch of bs and we need to interpret it our own way and speculate. That is YOUR STANCE. My stance is stupid lol.. that must mean your stance is down right horrific.
Originally posted by KuRuPT ThanosiWhy are you bothering with Snake Eyes and LordofMurder ? when you know they are sad trolls who dont contribute anything to a thread ever, all they do is repeat the same thing over and over again.
Really.. which stance of mine was stupid. May stance is we are suppose to take what people say at face value the majority of time. Unless circumstances change or something is later said to disprove said statement.YOUR STANCE IS: The majority of time we assume the characters are lying and not telling us the truth. The writer in fact is having characters say a whole bunch of bs and we need to interpret it our own way and speculate. That is YOUR STANCE. My stance is stupid lol.. that must mean your stance is down right horrific.
Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Really.. which stance of mine was stupid. May stance is we are suppose to take what people say at face value the majority of time. Unless circumstances change or something is later said to disprove said statement.YOUR STANCE IS: The majority of time we assume the characters are lying and not telling us the truth. The writer in fact is having characters say a whole bunch of bs and we need to interpret it our own way and speculate. That is YOUR STANCE. My stance is stupid lol.. that must mean your stance is down right horrific.
If that were truly my stance; you'd have no trouble posting the quote where I stated it.
So by all means, provide the quote.
Originally posted by Silent Master
If that were truly my stance; you'd have no trouble posting the quote where I stated it.So by all means, provide the quote.
I ask you to provide the quote where I said ALL statements are true. You dodged providing that because I never stated that.
You asked for proof that Thanos claim was correct. So then, I'm guessing all statements made in comics or movies need to later be verified in order for them to be true? Is that your stance? You dug yourself a hole Master and you just can't get out of it. You know as well as I do.. statement don't have to be verified all the time. You know as well as I do that in movies or comics or many genres writer make people say stuff to give us an idea about what is going on. The majority of the time we take those as the truth. We don't need verification of each statement made. I just like seeing you squirm like you are now. Knowing you dug yourself a hole with another stupid master question and yet again you get called on it by me.
There is a difference between 1st and 2nd party statements, Galactus commenting in his power level would be an example of 1st party statement, I have no trouble giving such a statement the benefit of the doubt, until it was proven otherwise
You however are trying to take a 2nd party statement as true without any sort of evidence to back it up.
