Originally posted by TheGame17Not when I am referring to offensive abilities aka full power. She was vulnerable meaning you could hurt her but she wasn't lacking in the power area at all.
I strongly disagree. the level of vulnerability is an aspect of one's power IMO.
Originally posted by Black bolt zI understand this perfectly. Vulnerability and power aren't the same thing.
👆If someone is weakened they are not at full power.Quan doesn't understand this.
Originally posted by Uriel005This is comics your real world logic doesn't apply here.
Also I'm fairly certain that powers are limited in a faux body due to them not being able to handle the strain of full power. Like charging a capacitor far beyond its rating. It will short/explode.
Originally posted by quanchi112I just applied them but anyways Agent Orange has the battery of the orange lanterns to himself. An equal to the entirety of the Oan central battery which btw powers the entire GL corps. Fairly certain that Larf directly wielding the lantern would stomp on Thanos in a heart beat if he absorbs the central battery like hal did when he went psycho.
Not when I am referring to offensive abilities aka full power. She was vulnerable meaning you could hurt her but she wasn't lacking in the power area at all.I understand this perfectly. Vulnerability and power aren't the same thing.
This is comics your real world logic doesn't apply here.
Originally posted by Uriel005I am fairly certain he wouldn't as he hasn't ever been portrayed to be the force you seem to want to describe him as.
I just applied them but anyways Agent Orange has the battery of the orange lanterns to himself. An equal to the entirety of the Oan central battery which btw powers the entire GL corps. Fairly certain that Larf directly wielding the lantern would stomp on Thanos in a heart beat if he absorbs the central battery like hal did when he went psycho.
Shields, teleportation he takes the battery off of him. If he was as powerful as you said Hal Jordan and Atrocitus should have been no problem yet both were and both pale in comparison to Thanos.
Originally posted by quanchi112Maker's durability was weakened. She was weakened. She was not at full power. And it was because she was weakened that thanos beat her.
Not when I am referring to offensive abilities aka full power. She was vulnerable meaning you could hurt her but she wasn't lacking in the power area at all.I understand this perfectly. Vulnerability and power aren't the same thing.
This is comics your real world logic doesn't apply here.
So you still have yet to answer my question.
Originally posted by Black bolt zWhich has to do with her vulnerability not over offensive power as I broke this down as you and others want to use more generalized terms not specific ones like myself.
Maker's durability was weakened. She was weakened. She was not at full power. And it was because she was weakened that thanos beat her.So you still have yet to answer my question.
Your initial question was who did Thanos beat who is more powerful than Larf. Maker. Now you answer mine.
Originally posted by quanchi112Who was weakened.
Which has to do with her vulnerability not over offensive power as I broke this down as you and others want to use more generalized terms not specific ones like myself.Your initial question was who did Thanos beat who is more powerful than Larf. Maker. Now you answer mine.
Answer the question.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Which has to do with her vulnerability not over offensive power as I broke this down as you and others want to use more generalized terms not specific ones like myself.Your initial question was who did Thanos beat who is more powerful than Larf. Maker. Now you answer mine.
Do you have any others than just Surfer and Maker (a.k.a. "not at full power" Maker)?
Originally posted by TheGame17Maker was at full power just vulnerable. You can get specific like I do you use generalized words like power when I reference and use it in a more specific manner.
Do you have any others than just Surfer and Maker (a.k.a. "not at full power" Maker)?
I won't continue to name more examples since no one else can even give me one example of someone Larfleeze easily pwned.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Maker was at full power just vulnerable. You can get specific like I do you use generalized words like power when I reference and use it in a more specific manner.I won't continue to name more examples since no one else can even give me one example of someone Larfleeze easily pwned.
I was specific: vulnerability is an aspect of power. They go together. Even IF I were being general, I'd rather have a "generalized" correct definition than a "specific" wrong one. 🙂
ANYWAYS, many ( including myself ) are reluctant to answer your question when your answer has been less than satisfactory...
Originally posted by TheGame17I was specific I was only talking about offensive power. I told you this over and over again.
I was specific: vulnerability is an aspect of power. They go together. Even IF I were being general, I'd rather have a "generalized" correct definition than a "specific" wrong one. 🙂ANYWAYS, many ( including myself ) are reluctant to answer your question when your answer has been less than satisfactory...
I answered the question over and over again. I won't keep answering only because I know Larfleeze hasn't beaten anyone nearly as impressive as either.