Originally posted by King KandyYou make a good point. There is quite the dilemma. In truth we can only analyze the evidence on hand. I was wondering if anyone had any personal experiences that they could share that could be analyzed. Coincidence itself could lead to so many possibilities that defining an occurrence as miraculous would take some very serious evidence.
But why would you include it in your list of options when it's an option that never could be logically chosen?For science to be chosen as the explanation, we only need to develop an explanation.
For god to be chosen as the explanation, we need to be unable to develop a scientific explanation. But since you can't prove that an explanation won't be found in the future, you can't logically ever meet that criteria.
I myself have had one experience in particular where my brother survived a head injury at school that broke his skull. When I went to him his eyes were open and he was bleeding out of his nose. I was elated when a pulse was found and I knew he hadn't died. I had to credit God with this and still do despite the fact that it may be explained as luck or coincidence that he wasn't killed or brain damaged. A miracle such as this however is up for debate and/or immediate dismissal by others and I can appreciate why.
I was just curious as to whether other people have had experiences that they were convinced were miraculous and whether or not their documented experience was not debatable or subject to immediate dismissal. As of yet I have to assume that there are none in the KMC forum who have.