Division of Inheritance According to Noble Quran

Started by Ronma141 pages

Division of Inheritance According to Noble Quran

NO ERROR
IN QUR’AN!

ACCORDÝNG TO QUR’AN

Division of Inheritance

assoc. prof. dr. eng. halis aydemir

No matter in which language you write the words of 'Qu'ran' and 'error'; when you search in the internet, first examples you see in the sites will be about the ones concerning the claim of error related with the inheritance verses in Qur'an. You will see the explanations with these verses in detail and the criticism of how these verses cannot be applied mathematically with some practical examples as well!

Whether such approach directed to Qu'ran is evil-minded or querier is not related with the essence of the issue; in conclusion there is a challenge pointed out mathematically in such critiques and this condition cannot be ignored.

It is out of question that the inheritance division by God is not appropriate mathematically. God is the creator of humankind and the science of mathematics. Now then, it is impossible that God proposes an imperfect division mathematically. It is possible to find similar expressions in corresponding sites.

Therefore, each so-called error to be found in Qu'ran has been transformed into an argument directing to weaken or confute the truth of its being apocalyptic. The claim concerning the inheritance divisions is one of the the most discussed examples and comes to minds first.

While we're discussing about inheritance divisions during Qu'ran Courses that we carried out in the public meetings in Qu'ran Research Foundation (KURAV) auditoriums, we also evaluated this subject mathematically with contributions of my dear friends. Visual and audial records of this activity is available on the website: kurandersleri.net. Thanks to inspirations from some of our friends saying that the results we acquired are a little bit different, remarkable and original, we find it acceptable to broadcast by publishing a book.

This study has been prepared as a result of such collective approach. Contrary to popular belief, it is not established on the base of interpretation. It has been carried out on the platform where source text has been considered literally and the differences encountered in formal plan have not been ignored.

I believe that the ones considering the inheritance divisions verses subjected to several speculations until now, one more time from the perspective of this book will realize in a little while that they face with a real mathematical miracle rather than a problematic challenge in number.

I've been curious about the teachings of the Quran but admittedly not not curious enough to read it. You seem to believe in it so I'll ask you do you think that it promotes peace? I wouldn't know because most of the people I hear talking about islam aren't saying anything that doesn't sound biased. Honestly in reference to the above post I don't know what to think of it. Seems like you want me to download a book. I'd rather just take your word for it.

Edited out the website plug. Discussion is encouraged, advertisements are not.

Originally posted by The MISTER
I've been curious about the teachings of the Quran but admittedly not not curious enough to read it. You seem to believe in it so I'll ask you do you think that it promotes peace? I wouldn't know because most of the people I hear talking about islam aren't saying anything that doesn't sound biased. Honestly in reference to the above post I don't know what to think of it. Seems like you want me to download a book. I'd rather just take your word for it.

That's a kind of dumb question when you think about it. Why would he promote it if he didn't think it was peaceful. Its like me asking a christian if he thinks Jesus taught good ethics.

Originally posted by The MISTER
I've been curious about the teachings of the Quran but admittedly not not curious enough to read it. You seem to believe in it so I'll ask you do you think that it promotes peace? I wouldn't know because most of the people I hear talking about islam aren't saying anything that doesn't sound biased. Honestly in reference to the above post I don't know what to think of it. Seems like you want me to download a book. I'd rather just take your word for it.

Well, the obvious response to that is that you should probably read it for yourself. You can get a cheap Koran for like 5 or 6 bucks at Barnes-&-Noble.

To answer your question in a nutshell: It promotes peace during peacetime (redundancy?) and for 90% of the time. It encourages wars of retaliation or in defense of other Muslims, but discourages pre-emptive strikes. So when you see Koranic quotes on Bible Thumper websites like "Slay the unbelievers where ever ye find them", they've deliberatley omitted either the sentence immediately before or after in order to make it appear to endorse mindless violence. But sentences like that are only found in paragraphs with detailed preconditions and strict regulations concerning the conduct of warfare. People like Jerry Falwell would have you believe that "Kill everyone!" appears randomly throughout the Koran, but that's actually not the case.

Originally posted by Quiero Mota
Well, the obvious response to that is that you should probably read it for yourself. You can get a cheap Koran for like 5 or 6 bucks at Barnes-&-Noble.

To answer your question in a nutshell: It promotes peace during peacetime (redundancy?) and for 90% of the time. It encourages wars of retaliation or in defense of other Muslims, but discourages pre-emptive strikes. So when you see Koranic quotes on Bible Thumper websites like "Slay the unbelievers where ever ye find them", they've deliberatley omitted either the sentence immediately before or after in order to make it appear to endorse mindless violence. But sentences like that are only found in paragraphs with detailed preconditions and strict regulations concerning the conduct of warfare. People like Jerry Falwell would have you believe that "Kill everyone!" appears randomly throughout the Koran, but that's actually not the case.

Thanks.

Originally posted by King Kandy
That's a kind of dumb question when you think about it. Why would he promote it if he didn't think it was peaceful. Its like me asking a christian if he thinks Jesus taught good ethics.
It's not dumb because I was asking him what he thought. You shouldn't assume that a person calling themselves a christian even knows who Jesus is. Answers can give you insight on how serious you can take someone. If I ask you whether you thought Martin Luthor King was peaceful and you said no I wouldn't feel like you were a good person to take seriously. I might even want you to elaborate so I could see whether or not you have some realistic reason for your stance, but the initial question seeks a sincere personal opinion. It's dumber to assume answers than to ask questions. 😮‍💨

Originally posted by The MISTER
It's dumber to assume answers than to ask questions. 😮‍💨

👆 No doubt. That mistake is also a cause of false convictions (aka- confirmatory bias).

{edited}

So, 6 months on, you think it will be ok to post an ad for another site, after I edited out the first one?