Superman 4

Started by K.Diddy2 pages

Superman 4

๐Ÿ˜ฎโ€๐Ÿ’จ After seeing the third last week,it was hard to imagine this franchise getting much worse,damn was I wrong ๐Ÿ˜ฌ This is about as lame as it gets,what a disappointing way to end a franchise,It really did just feel like a cheap cash in,despite still having Christopher Reeves playing Superman.There was just no point really to this movie at all. 2.5/10

Hellish. Absolutely hellish.

My mood was great until I read this and was reminded of the horror.
Now I just dont know what to do... ๐Ÿ™

reaaaaaallllly.

-10/10

this was the absolute worst in the series..

Re: Superman 4

Originally posted by K.Diddy
๐Ÿ˜ฎโ€๐Ÿ’จ After seeing the third last week,it was hard to imagine this franchise getting much worse,damn was I wrong ๐Ÿ˜ฌ This is about as lame as it gets,what a disappointing way to end a franchise,It really did just feel like a cheap cash in,despite still having Christopher Reeves playing Superman.There was just no point really to this movie at all. 2.5/10

i tried to tell you that.everybody knows its horrible and even worse than superman 3.3 is okay,it has a few good moments in it and it was interesting seeing him go back to his hometown smallville and seeing his old crush from high school Lana Lang and things,but there is totally nothing at all likeable about superman 4 as you just now found out.well you got to learn sometime i guess.i just cant believe your just NOW finding out about these two films though. ๐Ÿ˜† ๐Ÿ˜† ๐Ÿคฃ ๐Ÿ˜‚ ๐Ÿ˜ฑ

Originally posted by BruceSkywalker
this was the absolute worst in the series..

amen to that.

Re: Re: Superman 4

Originally posted by Mr Parker
i tried to tell you that.everybody knows its horrible and even worse than superman 3.3 is okay,it has a few good moments in it and it was interesting seeing him go back to his hometown smallville and seeing his old crush from high school Lana Lang and things,but there is totally nothing at all likeable about superman 4 as you just now found out.well you got to learn sometime i guess.i just cant believe your just NOW finding out about these two films though. ๐Ÿ˜† ๐Ÿ˜† ๐Ÿคฃ ๐Ÿ˜‚ ๐Ÿ˜ฑ

๐Ÿ˜ฌ I've known about these 2 sequels for years but just never seen them,while I've been on holidays I've just been trying to pretty much watch as many movies as I can
๐Ÿ˜ Did anyone notice that a human female managed to breathe in space in this movie?

Sadly, I did notice. lol The nostalgic critic review basically sums it all up perfectly. ๐Ÿ˜‚ A shame this had to be the last movie of Reeves's Superman career. Should've stopped for awhile after the 3rd or 2nd one.

I wonder if anyone even proof read the script

Originally posted by steverules_2
I wonder if anyone even proof read the script

๐Ÿ˜‚ Going by letting humans breathe in space with no explanation whatsoever I doubt it.

I never saw the entire movie. I love watching bad movies, but I sort of fear this one...

Originally posted by K.Diddy
๐Ÿ˜‚ Going by letting humans breathe in space with no explanation whatsoever I doubt it.

Has anyone ever tried breathing in space? Who knows, maybe it's all good.

I loathe the third and fourth Superman films. Even Richard Pryor couldn't save 3, and Nuclear Man was just an atrocious choice for 4.

The entire Superman film franchise is just too subpar. As good as the first two films are, they just don't do justice to the extensive rogue gallery that Superman has.

Even the plot of Superman Returns was just another rehash of the real estate scheme from the first film.

If Zack Snyder is truly going to direct the next Superman film, slow motion and all, I really hope to see a villain other than Luthor. Darkseid, Despero, Doomsday, Brainiac, Metallo, Parasite, Mr. Mxyzptlk, Lobo. Hell, even Starro would be a better villain pick than Luthor.

Agreed, Superman is only as good as his villain(s). While Luther is great, it's been done and re-done.

Lobo would be a fail though, imo.

Darksied wouldn't do well over one film.

And why would that be?

Originally posted by Robtard
Agreed, Superman is only as good as his villain(s). While Luther is great, it's been done and re-done.

Lobo would be a fail though, imo.

Darksied wouldn't do well over one film.

Superman's arch nemesis is not a black soul singer. Lex LUTHOR is a bald, white, megalomaniacal billionaire.

Cretin.

Darksied would look kinda silly in a live-action movie imo.

They should do Superboy-Prime. โœ…

Depends on how well they make him look through CGI and stuff, but having SBP over Darkseid? Hell to the no.

I want to see Metallo or Brainiac. Those two villains seem the most plausible for a single film.

Originally posted by Impediment
I loathe the third and fourth Superman films. Even Richard Pryor couldn't save 3, and Nuclear Man was just an atrocious choice for 4.

The entire Superman film franchise is just too subpar. As good as the first two films are, they just don't do justice to the extensive rogue gallery that Superman has.

Even the plot of Superman Returns was just another rehash of the real estate scheme from the first film.

If Zack Snyder is truly going to direct the next Superman film, slow motion and all, I really hope to see a villain other than Luthor. Darkseid, Despero, Doomsday, Brainiac, Metallo, Parasite, Mr. Mxyzptlk, Lobo. Hell, even Starro would be a better villain pick than Luthor.

๐Ÿ˜ฎโ€๐Ÿ’จ Completely Agree,Luthor has been used way too many times,that by the time Superman Returns came out we had all seen it before,I think it would of been a lot more successful if they had of introduced a new villain,The audience is tired of Luthor